POS 8C: Post-effective amendment filed under the 1933 Act only or under both the 1933 and 1940 Acts pursuant to Section 8(c) of the 1933 Act by closed-end investment companies
Published on April 4, 2008
As
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April
4, 2008
Securities
Act Registration No. 333-138996
Investment
Company Act File Number 814-176
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
N-2
Registration
Statement Under
The Securities Act Of 1933:
o | ||
Post-Effective
Amendment No. 3
|
x
|
HARRIS
& HARRIS GROUP, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
111
West 57th
Street
Suite
1100
New
York, New York 10019
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
(212)
582-0900
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, including Area Code)
Charles
E. Harris, Chairman, CEO
111
West 57th
Street
Suite
1100
New
York, New York 10019
(Name
and
Address of Agent for Service)
Copies
to:
Sandra
M. Forman, Esq.
|
Richard
T. Prins, Esq.
|
General
Counsel
|
Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
|
Harris
& Harris Group, Inc.
|
Four
Times Square
|
111
West 57th
Street, Suite 1100
|
New
York, New York 10036
|
New
York, NY 10019
|
(212)
735-3000
|
(212)
582-0900
|
Approximate
Date of Proposed Public Offering:
From
time
to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement
If
any
securities being registered on this form will be offered on a delayed or
continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933,
other
than securities offered in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan, check
the following box. x
It
is
proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate
box)
x
when
declared effective pursuant to Section 8(c)
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Title of Securities Being Registered
|
Amount Being
Registered |
Proposed
Maximum Offering Price Per Share(1) |
Proposed
Maximum Aggregate Offering Price |
Amount of
Registration Fee |
|||||||||
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value
|
4,000,000
|
$
|
7.35
|
$
|
29,400,000
|
$
|
1,155.42
|
(2)
|
(1)
|
Estimated
solely for the purpose of determining the registration fee pursuant
to
Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933 and based on the average
of
the high and low prices as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market
of the
registrant’s Common Stock on April
1, 2008.
|
(2)
|
$1,186.43
previously paid in connection with this Registration Statement
filed on
November 27, 2006.
|
1
HARRIS
& HARRIS GROUP, INC.
CROSS-REFERENCE
SHEET
PART
A-THE PROSPECTUS
Items
in Part A of Form N-2
|
|
Location
in Prospectus
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
|
Outside
Front Cover
|
|
Front
Cover Page
|
Item
2.
|
|
Cover
Pages; Other Offering Information
|
|
Front
Cover Page; Inside Front Cover Page; Available
Information
|
Item
3.
|
|
Fee
Table and Synopsis
|
|
Prospectus
Summary; Table of Fees and Expenses
|
Item
4.
|
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
Selected
Condensed Consolidated Financial Data; Incorporation by
Reference
|
Item
5.
|
|
Plan
of Distribution
|
|
Prospectus
Summary; Plan of Distribution
|
Item
6.
|
|
Selling
Shareholders
|
|
Not
Applicable
|
Item
7.
|
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
Item
8.
|
|
General
Description of the Registrant
|
|
Outside
Front Cover; Business; Risk Factors; Investment Policies; Price
Range of
Common Stock; General Description of our Portfolio
Companies
|
Item
9.
|
|
Management
|
|
Management
of the Company
|
Item
10.
|
|
Capital
Stock, Long-Term Debt and Other Securities
|
|
Prospectus
Summary; Capitalization; Dividends and Distributions; Taxation;
Risk
Factors
|
Item
11.
|
|
Defaults
and Arrears on Senior Securities
|
|
Not
Applicable
|
Item
12.
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
Management
of the Company
|
Item
13.
|
|
Table
of Contents of the Statement of Additional Information
|
|
Not
Applicable
|
Items
in Part B of Form N-2(1)
|
|
Location
in Prospectus
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Item
14.
|
|
Cover
Page
|
|
Not
Applicable
|
Item
15.
|
|
Table
of Contents
|
|
Not
Applicable
|
Item
16.
|
|
General
Information and History
|
|
Not
Applicable
|
Item
17.
|
|
Investment
Objective and Policies
|
|
Business;
Investment Policies
|
Item
18.
|
|
Management
of the Company
|
|
Management
of the Company; Certain Government Regulations
|
Item
19.
|
|
Control
Persons and Principal Shareholders
|
|
Management
of the Company
|
Item
20.
|
|
Investment
Advisory and Other Services
|
|
Management
of the Company; Experts
|
Item
21.
|
|
Portfolio
Managers
|
|
Management
of the Company
|
Item
22.
|
|
Brokerage,
Allocation and Other Practices
|
|
Brokerage
|
Item
23.
|
|
Tax
Status
|
|
Taxation
|
Item
24.
|
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
Incorporation
by Reference
|
PART
C-OTHER INFORMATION
Items
25-34 have been answered in Part C of this Registration Statement.
2
The
information in this Prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may
not
sell securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities
and
Exchange Commission is effective. This Prospectus is not an offer to sell
these
securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any
state
where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Subject
to Completion
Preliminary
Prospectus, Dated April 4, 2008
4,000,000
Shares
Common
Stock
Harris
& Harris Group, Inc.®,
is a
venture capital company specializing in tiny technology that operates as
a
business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. We
may
offer, from time to time, shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value per
share
("Common Stock"), in one or more delayed offerings. The Common Stock may
be
offered at prices and on terms to be set forth in one or more supplements
to
this Prospectus (each a "Prospectus Supplement"). The offering price per
share
of our Common Stock will not be less than the net asset value per share of
our
Common Stock at the time we make the offering exclusive of any underwriting
commissions or discounts. You should read this Prospectus and the applicable
Prospectus Supplement carefully before you invest in our Common Stock.
Our
Common Stock may be offered directly to one or more purchasers through agents
designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers.
The Prospectus Supplement relating to the offering will identify any agents
or
underwriters involved in the sale of our Common Stock, and will set forth
any
applicable purchase price, fee, commission or discount arrangement between
us
and our agents or underwriters, or among our underwriters, or the basis upon
which such amount may be calculated. We may not sell any of our Common Stock
through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of a Prospectus
Supplement describing the method and terms of the particular offering of
our
Common Stock. Our Common Stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under
the
symbol "TINY." On April 1, 2008, the last reported sale price of our Common
Stock was $7.34.
An
Investment in the Securities Offered in this Prospectus Involves a High Degree
of Risk. You Should Consider Investing in Us Only if You Are Capable of
Sustaining the Loss of Your Entire Investment.
See
"Risk Factors" beginning on page 11.
This
Prospectus sets forth concisely the information about us that a prospective
investor should know before investing. You should read this Prospectus, before
deciding whether to invest in our Common Stock, and retain it for future
reference. You may obtain our annual reports, request other information about
us
and make shareholder inquiries by calling toll free 1-877-TINY TECH. Additional
information about us has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC") and is available upon written or oral request and without charge.
We
also make available our annual reports, free of charge, on our website at
www.TinyTechVC.com. Information on our website is not part of this Prospectus
and should not be considered as such when making your investment decision.
Material incorporated by reference and other information about us can be
obtained from the SEC's website (http://www.sec.gov).
Neither
the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these
securities or determined if this Prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The
date of the Prospectus is ,
2008.
[This
Page Intentionally Left Blank]
You
should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference
in
this Prospectus. We have not authorized any other person to provide you with
different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent
information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell
these
securities in any jurisdiction in which the offer or sale is not
permitted.
In
this
Prospectus, unless otherwise indicated, "Harris & Harris," "Company," "us,"
"our" and "we" refer to Harris & Harris Group, Inc.®
"Harris
& Harris Group, Inc." is a registered service mark. This Prospectus also
includes trademarks owned by other persons.
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
Page
|
||||
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
|
1
|
|||
TABLE
OF FEES AND EXPENSES
|
7
|
|||
SELECTED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
8
|
|||
SELECTED
QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
9
|
|||
INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE
|
10
|
|||
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
|
10
|
|||
RISK
FACTORS
|
11
|
|||
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
|
21
|
|||
USE
OF PROCEEDS
|
21
|
|||
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
|
21
|
|||
BUSINESS
|
23
|
|||
GENERAL
DESCRIPTION OF OUR PORTFOLIO COMPANIES
|
30
|
|||
DETERMINATION
OF NET ASSET VALUE
|
37
|
|||
INVESTMENT
POLICIES
|
40
|
|||
MANAGEMENT
OF THE COMPANY
|
45
|
|||
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
45
|
|||
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
53
|
|||
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
70
|
|||
BROKERAGE
|
70
|
|||
DIVIDENDS
AND DISTRIBUTIONS
|
71
|
|||
TAXATION
|
71
|
|||
CERTAIN
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
|
74
|
|||
CAPITALIZATION
|
76
|
|||
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
|
76
|
|||
LEGAL
MATTERS
|
77
|
|||
EXPERTS
|
77
|
|||
FURTHER
INFORMATION
|
77
|
|||
PRIVACY
POLICY
|
78
|
[This
Page Intentionally Left Blank]
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This
summary highlights information that is described more fully elsewhere in this
Prospectus and in the documents to which we have referred. It may not contain
all of the information that is important to you. To understand the offering
fully, you should read the entire document carefully, including the risk factors
beginning on page 11.
Our
Business
Harris
& Harris Group, Inc., is a venture capital company, specializing in tiny
technology, that operates as a business development company under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, which we refer to as the 1940 Act. For tax purposes, we
operate as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, which we refer to as the Code. We are an internally
managed investment company; that is, our officers and employees, rather than
an
investment adviser, manage our operations under the general supervision of
our
Board of Directors. Our investment objective is to achieve long-term capital
appreciation, rather than current income, by making venture capital investments
in early-stage companies. Our approach includes patient examination of available
early stage opportunities, thorough due diligence and close involvement with
management.
We
make
initial venture capital investments exclusively in "tiny technology," which
we
define as nanotechnology, microsystems and microelectromechanical systems
(which
we refer to as MEMS). Nanotechnology is measured in nanometers, which are
units
of measurement in billionths of a meter. Microsystems and microelectromechanical
systems are measured in micrometers, which are units of measurement in
millionths of a meter. We consider a company to be a tiny technology company
if
a product or products, or intellectual property covering a product or products,
that we consider to be at the microscale or smaller is material to its business
plan. At December 31, 2007, 54.7 percent of our total assets and 99.9 percent
of
our venture capital portfolio were invested in tiny technology investments.
The
remaining 0.1 percent of our venture capital portfolio represents one non-tiny
technology investment made prior to 2001. We may make follow-on investments
in
any of our portfolio companies. By making these investments, we seek to provide
our shareholders with a specific focus on tiny technology through a portfolio
of
venture capital investments that addresses a variety of markets and products.
We
believe that we are the only publicly traded business development company
making
initial venture capital investments exclusively in tiny
technology.
Tiny
technology is multidisciplinary and widely applicable, and it incorporates
technology that was not previously in widespread use. Products enabled by
tiny
technology are applicable to a large number of industries including
pharmaceuticals, medical devices, electronics and alternative (clean) energy.
The use of nanotechnology-enabled advanced materials for clean energy in
particular is an area of increasing global interest, and these types of
materials are the cornerstones of new generations of photovoltaics, batteries,
solid-state lighting, fuel cells, bio-fuels and other energy-related
applications that are the focus of a number of recently funded early-stage
companies. Although we have not specifically targeted investments in alternative
energy companies, as of December 31, 2007, eight of our 30 active portfolio
companies were focused on the commercialization of alternative energy-related
products. We define active portfolio companies as those companies that are
currently operating and are not in the process of unwinding the business.
These
companies represented 33.4 percent of our venture capital portfolio based
on
value as of December 31, 2007.
As
a
venture capital company, we make it possible for our investors to participate
at
an early stage in this emerging field, while our portfolio companies are
still
private. By making investments in companies that control intellectual property
relevant to tiny technology, we are building a portfolio that we believe
will be
difficult to replicate in the future, as we believe it will likely become
increasingly difficult to create new foundational intellectual property in
nanotechnology. Because we typically invest as part of a syndicate of venture
capital firms, the syndicate's time horizon often determines ours, though
we may
provide seed capital before forming a syndicate with other investors, or
maintain our investment in an investee company after it goes public, even
after
our co-investors sell or distribute their shares. To the investor, we
offer:
·
|
a
portfolio consisting of investments that are generally available
only to a
small, highly specialized group of professional venture capital firms
as
investors;
|
1
·
|
a
team of professionals, including six full-time members of management,
five
of whom are designated as Managing Directors: Charles E. Harris,
Douglas
W. Jamison, Alexei A. Andreev, Michael A. Janse and Daniel B. Wolfe,
and a
Vice President, Misti Ushio, to evaluate and monitor investments.
One of
our directors is also a consultant to us, Lori D. Pressman. These
seven
professionals collectively have expertise in venture capital investing,
intellectual property and tiny technology;
|
·
|
the
opportunity to benefit from our experience in a new field expected
to
permeate a variety of industries; and
|
·
|
through
the ownership of our publicly traded shares, a measure of liquidity
not
typically available in underlying venture capital portfolio
investments.
|
The
number of tiny technology investment opportunities available to us has increased
over the past five years, through both new opportunities and opportunities
for
follow-on investments in our existing portfolio companies. We believe that
our
expertise and record of prior investments in tiny technology are likely to
lead
us to additional tiny technology investment opportunities in the future. We
intend to use the net proceeds of this offering to:
·
|
increase
our capital in order to take advantage of these investment
opportunities;
|
·
|
lower
our expenses as a percentage of assets and otherwise achieve certain
economies and advantages of scale in our operations, as our costs
are
primarily fixed. As our assets increase by the net proceeds of this
offering, our fixed costs will represent a smaller percentage of
our
assets; and
|
·
|
pay
operating expenses, including due diligence expenses on potential
investments.
|
We
identify investment opportunities primarily through four channels:
·
|
our
involvement in the field of tiny technology;
|
·
|
research
universities that seek to transfer their scientific discoveries to
the
private sector;
|
·
|
other
venture capital companies seeking co-investors or referring deals
to us;
and
|
·
|
direct
calls and business plan submissions by companies, business incubators
and
individuals seeking venture
capital.
|
Since
registering as an investment company in 1992, we have invested in a variety
of
industries. In 1994, we invested in our first tiny technology company, Nanophase
Technologies Corporation. In 1995, we elected to be regulated as a business
development company. Recognizing the potential of tiny technology, we continued
to monitor developments in the field, and since 2001, we have made tiny
technology our exclusive focus for initial investments. From August 2001
through
December 31, 2007, all 38 of our initial investments have been in companies
involved in the development of products and technologies based on tiny
technology. At December 31, 2007, our portfolio included investments in a
total
of 35 companies, 30 of which we consider to be active tiny technology companies.
As
is
usual in the venture capital industry, our venture capital investments are
generally in convertible preferred stock, which is usually the most senior
security in a portfolio company’s equity capital structure until the company has
substantial revenues, and which gives us seniority over the holders of common
stock (usually including the founders) while preserving fully our participation
in the upside potential of the portfolio company through the conversion feature.
Our portfolio investments in some instances include a dividend right payable
in
kind (which increases our participation in the portfolio company) or potentially
in cash. In-kind distributions are primarily made in additional shares of
convertible preferred stock. We expect to continue to invest in convertible
securities.
2
Tiny
Technology
In
our
view, tiny technology is neither an industry nor a single technology, but
a
variety of enabling technologies with critical dimensions below 100 micrometers.
Tiny technology manifests itself in tools, materials, systems and devices
that
address broad markets, including instrumentation, alternative energy,
electronics, photonics, computing, medical devices, pharmaceutical
manufacturing, drug delivery and drug discovery. The development and
commercialization of tiny technology often require the integration of multiple
disciplines, including biology, physics, chemistry, materials science, computer
science and the engineering sciences.
Examples
of tiny technology-enabled products currently on the market are quite diverse.
They include sensors, accelerometers used in automobiles to sense impact and
deploy airbags, cosmetics with ingredients that block ultraviolet light but
are
invisible to the human eye, nanoclays used for strength in the running boards
of
minivans, textiles with liquid-stain repellant surfaces, fast acting painkillers
and certain pharmaceutical therapeutics.
We
currently have 15 companies in our tiny technology portfolio that generate
commercial revenue from the sale of products or services. These companies
offer
a range of products including components for optical networking, high-brightness
LEDs, carbon nanotube-based sensors, optical switches, silicon carbide brake
rotors, chiral columns for the pharmaceutical industry, metabolomic profiling
services and decorative tiles.
Within
tiny technology, microsystems and MEMS both refer to materials, devices and
processes that are on a micrometer size scale. A micrometer, which is also
referred to as a micron, is 0.000001 meter, or one millionth of a meter. In
practice, any device, or device enabled by components, in a size range from
100
microns down to 0.1 micron may be considered "micro." Nanotechnology refers
to
materials, devices and processes with critical dimensions below 0.1 micron,
equal to 100 nanometers. A nanometer is 0.000000001 meter, or one billionth
of a
meter. It is at the scale below 100 nanometers, the nanoscale, that quantum
effects begin to dominate classical macroscale physics. At the nanoscale, size-
and shape-dependent properties of materials allow previously unattainable
material and device performance.
Although
the practical application of tiny technology requires great expertise to
implement in manufacturing processes, we believe that tiny technology’s broad
applicability presents significant and diverse market opportunities.
Risk
Factors
Set
forth
below is a summary of certain risks that you should carefully consider before
investing in our Common Stock. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 11 for
a
more detailed discussion of the risks of investing in our Common
Stock.
Risks
related to the companies in our portfolio.
·
|
A
continuing lack of initial public offering opportunities may cause
companies to stay in our portfolio longer, leading to lower returns,
write-downs and write-offs.
|
·
|
Investing
in small, private companies involves a high degree of risk and is
highly
speculative.
|
·
|
We
may invest in companies working with technologies or intellectual
property
that currently have few or no proven commercial
applications.
|
·
|
Our
portfolio companies may not successfully develop, manufacture or
market
their products.
|
·
|
Our
portfolio companies working with tiny technology may be particularly
susceptible to intellectual property
litigation.
|
·
|
Unfavorable
general economic conditions, as well as unfavorable conditions
specific to
the venture capital industry or a segment of portfolio companies,
could
result in the inability of our portfolio companies to access additional
capital, leading to financial losses in our
portfolio.
|
3
·
|
Unstable
credit markets could adversely affect our portfolio
companies.
|
·
|
The
value of our portfolio could be adversely affected if the technologies
utilized by our portfolio companies are found or even rumored or
feared,
to cause health or environmental risks, or if legislation is passed
that
limits the commercialization of any of these technologies.
|
·
|
Our
portfolio companies may generate revenues from the sale of non-tiny
technology-enabled products.
|
Risks
related to the illiquidity of our investments.
·
|
We
invest in illiquid securities and may not be able to dispose of them
when
it is advantageous to do so, or ever.
|
·
|
Unfavorable
economic conditions and regulatory changes could impair our ability
to
engage in liquidity events.
|
·
|
Even
if some of our portfolio companies complete initial public offerings,
the
returns on our investments in those companies would be
uncertain.
|
Risks
related to our Company.
·
|
Because
there is generally no established market in which to value our
investments, our Valuation Committee’s value determinations may differ
materially from the values that a ready market or third party would
attribute to these investments.
|
·
|
Changes
in valuations of our privately held, early stage companies tend
to be more
volatile than changes in prices of publicly traded
securities.
|
·
|
We
expect to continue to experience material write-downs of securities
of
portfolio companies.
|
·
|
Because
we do not choose investments based on a strategy of diversification,
the
value of our business is subject to greater volatility than the
value of
companies with more broadly diversified investments.
|
·
|
We
are dependent upon key management personnel for future success and
may not
be able to retain them.
|
·
|
We
will need to hire additional employees as the size of our portfolio
increases.
|
·
|
The
market for venture capital investments, including tiny technology
investments, is highly competitive.
|
·
|
In
addition to the difficulty of finding attractive investment opportunities,
our status as a regulated business development company may hinder
our
ability to participate in investment opportunities or to protect
the value
of existing investments.
|
·
|
Our
failure to make follow-on investments in our portfolio companies
could
impair the value of our portfolio.
|
·
|
Bank
borrowing or the issuance of debt securities or preferred stock
by us, to
fund investments in portfolio companies or to fund our operating
expenses,
would make our total return to common shareholders more volatile.
The use
of debt would leverage our available common equity capital, magnifying
the
impact of changes in the value of our investment portfolio on our
net
asset value. In addition, the cost of debt or preferred stock financing
could exceed the return on the assets the proceeds are used to
acquire, in
which case the use of leverage would have an adverse impact on
the holders
of our Common Stock.
|
·
|
We
are authorized to issue preferred stock, which would convey special
rights
and privileges to its owners senior to those of Common Stock
shareholders.
|
·
|
Loss
of status as a RIC would reduce our net asset value and distributable
income.
|
·
|
We
operate in a heavily regulated environment, and changes to, or
non-compliance with, regulations and laws could harm our
business.
|
4
·
|
Market
prices of our Common Stock will continue to be
volatile.
|
·
|
Quarterly
results fluctuate and are not indicative of future quarterly
performance.
|
·
|
To
the extent that we do not realize income or choose not to retain
after-tax
realized capital gains, we will have a greater need for additional
capital
to fund our investments and operating
expenses.
|
·
|
Investment
in foreign securities could result in additional
risks.
|
Risks
related to this offering.
·
|
Investing
in our stock is highly speculative and an investor could lose some
or all
of the amount invested.
|
·
|
We
will have discretion over the use of proceeds of this
offering.
|
·
|
Our
shares might trade at discounts from net asset value or at premiums
that
are unsustainable over the long
term.
|
·
|
The
Board of Directors intends to grant stock options to our employees
pursuant to the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan. When exercised, these
options may have a dilutive effect on existing
shareholders.
|
·
|
You
have no right to require us to repurchase your
shares.
|
Other
Information
Our
website is www.TinyTechVC.com and is not incorporated by reference into this
Prospectus. We make available free of charge through our website the following
materials (which are not incorporated by reference unless specifically stated
in
this Prospectus) as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing
them to the SEC:
·
|
our
annual report on Form 10-K;
|
·
|
our
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q;
|
·
|
our
current reports on Form 8-K; and
|
·
|
amendments
to those reports.
|
5
The
Offering
Common
Stock offered
|
We
may offer, from time to time, up to a total of 4,000,000 shares
of our
Common Stock available under this Prospectus on terms to be determined
at
the time of the offering. Our Common Stock may be offered at prices
and on
terms to be set forth in one or more Prospectus Supplements. The
offering
price per share of our Common Stock net of underwriting commissions
or
discounts will not be less than the net asset value per share of
our
Common Stock.
|
|
Use
of proceeds
|
Although
we will make initial investments exclusively in tiny technology,
we can
make follow-on investments in non-tiny technology companies currently
in
our portfolio. Further, while considering venture capital investments,
we
may invest the proceeds in U.S. government and agency securities,
which
may yield less than our operating expense ratio. We expect to invest
or
reserve for potential follow-on investment the net proceeds of
any sale of
shares under this Prospectus within two years from the completion
of such
sale. We may also use the proceeds of this offering for operating
expenses, including due diligence expenses on potential investments.
Our
portfolio companies rarely pay us dividends or interest, and we
do not
generate enough income from fixed income investments to meet all
of our
operating expenses. For this purpose, we do not expect to reserve
for
follow-on investments in any particular portfolio holding more
than the
greater of twice the investment to date in that portfolio holding
or five
times the initial investment in the case of seed-stage
investments,
though we may invest more than the amount reserved for this purpose
in any
particular portfolio holding.
|
|
Dividends
and Distributions
|
To
the extent that we retain any net capital gain, we may make deemed
capital
gain dividends. If we do make a deemed capital gain dividend, you
will not
receive a cash distribution, but instead you will receive a tax
credit and
increase in basis equal to your proportionate share of the tax
paid by us
on your behalf. We currently intend to retain our net capital gains
for
investment and pay the associated federal corporate income tax.
We may
change this policy in the future. See "Taxation."
|
|
Nasdaq
Global Market symbol
|
TINY
|
6
TABLE
OF FEES AND EXPENSES
The
following tables are intended to assist you in understanding the various
costs
and expenses directly or indirectly associated with investing in our Common
Stock. Amounts are for the current fiscal year after giving effect to
anticipated net proceeds of the offering for the 4,000,000 shares registered
pursuant to this Prospectus, assuming that we incur the estimated offering
expenses. The price per share used in this calculation was the closing price
of
our Common Stock on April 1, 2008 of $7.34.
Shareholder
Transaction Expenses
|
||||
Sales
Load(1)
(as a percentage of offering price)
|
N/A
|
|||
Offering
Expenses (as a percentage of offering price)
|
0.85
|
%
|
||
Annual
Expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to Common
Stock)
|
||||
Management
Fees(2)
|
N/A
|
|||
Other
Expenses(3)
|
||||
Salaries
and Benefits(4)
|
6.90
|
%
|
||
Administration
and Operations(5)
|
1.32
|
%
|
||
Professional
Fees
|
.54
|
%
|
||
Total
Annual Expenses(6)
|
8.76
|
%
|
_______________________________
Example
The
following examples illustrate the dollar amount of cumulative expenses that
would be incurred over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment
in our Common Stock. These amounts are based upon payment by us of expenses
at
levels set forth in the above table, including the non-cash, stock-based
compensation expenses.
On
the
basis of the foregoing, including the non-cash, stock-based compensation
expense, you would pay the following expenses on a $10,000 investment, assuming
a five percent annual return:*
1
Year
|
3
Years
|
5
Years
|
10
Years
|
|||||||
$ 938
|
$
|
2,549
|
$
|
4,041
|
$
|
7,305
|
*
|
This
example includes non-cash, stock-based compensation. Excluding
the
non-cash, stock-based compensation, you would pay expenses of $475
in 1
year, $1,268 in 3 years, $2,078 in 5 years and $4,181 in 10 years,
on a
$10,000 investment, assuming a five percent
return.
|
The
foregoing table is to assist you in understanding the various costs and expenses
that an investor in our Common Stock will bear directly or indirectly. The
assumed five percent annual return is not a prediction of, and does not
represent, the projected or actual performance of our Common Stock. The
above example should not be considered a representation of future expenses,
and
actual expenses and annual rates of return may be more or less than those
assumed for purposes of the example.
(1) |
In
the event that the shares of Common Stock to which this Prospectus
relates
are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding Prospectus Supplement
will disclose the sales load.
|
(2) |
The
Company has no external management fees because it is internally
managed.
|
(3) |
"Other
Expenses" are based on amounts for the fiscal year ended December
31,
2007.
|
(4) |
"Salaries
and Benefits" includes non-cash stock-based compensation expense
of
$8,050,807. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation expense
pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R) "Share-Based Payment," which requires
that we
determine the fair value of all share-based payments to employees,
including the fair value of grants of employee stock options, and
record
these amounts as an expense in the Statement of Operations over
the
vesting period with a corresponding increase to our additional
paid-in
capital. There is no effect on net asset value from stock-based
compensation expense at the time of grant. If options are exercised,
net
asset value per share will be decreased if the net asset value
per share
at the time of exercise is higher than the exercise price and net
asset
value per share will be increased if the net asset value per share
at the
time of exercise is lower than the exercise price. Excluding the
non-cash,
stock-based compensation expense, "Salaries and benefits" totals
$3,384,522 or 2.04 percent of net assets attributable to Common
Stock.
|
7
(5) |
"Administration
and Operations" includes expenses incurred for administration, operations,
rent, directors’ fees and expenses, depreciation and custodian
fees.
|
(6) |
"Total
Annual Expenses" includes non-cash compensation expense of $8,050,807.
See
Footnote (4) above. Cash-based total annual expenses as a percentage
of
net assets attributable to Common Stock is 3.91
percent.
|
SELECTED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The
information below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data and the notes thereto. Financial information
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
has
been derived from our financial statements that were audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. These historical results are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected in the future.
BALANCE
SHEET DATA
Financial
Position as of December 31:
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
142,893,332
|
$
|
118,328,590
|
$
|
132,938,120
|
$
|
79,361,451
|
$
|
44,115,128
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
$
|
4,529,988
|
$
|
4,398,287
|
$
|
14,950,378
|
$
|
4,616,652
|
$
|
3,432,390
|
||||||
Net
assets
|
$
|
138,363,344
|
$
|
113,930,303
|
$
|
117,987,742
|
$
|
74,744,799
|
$
|
40,682,738
|
||||||
Net
asset value per outstanding share
|
$
|
5.93
|
$
|
5.42
|
$
|
5.68
|
$
|
4.33
|
$
|
2.95
|
||||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
||||||
Cash
dividends paid per outstanding share
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
||||||
Shares
outstanding, end of year
|
23,314,573
|
21,015,017
|
20,756,345
|
17,248,845
|
13,798,845
|
8
Operating
Data for Year Ended December
31:
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|||||||
Total
investment income
|
$
|
2,705,636
|
$
|
3,028,761
|
$
|
1,540,862
|
$
|
637,562
|
$
|
167,785
|
||||||
Total
expenses1
|
$
|
14,533,179
|
$
|
10,641,696
|
$
|
7,006,623
|
$
|
4,046,341
|
$
|
2,731,527
|
||||||
Net
operating (loss) income
|
$
|
(11,827,543
|
)
|
$
|
(7,612,935
|
)
|
$
|
(5,465,761
|
)
|
$
|
(3,408,779
|
)
|
$
|
(2,563,742
|
)
|
|
Total
tax expense (benefit) 2
|
$
|
87,975
|
$
|
(227,355
|
)
|
$
|
8,288,778
|
$
|
650,617
|
$
|
13,761
|
|||||
Net
realized income (loss) from investments
|
$
|
30,162
|
$
|
258,693
|
$
|
14,208,789
|
$
|
858,503
|
$
|
(984,925
|
)
|
|||||
Net
decrease (increase) in unrealized depreciation on
investments
|
$
|
5,080,936
|
$
|
(4,418,870
|
)
|
$
|
(2,026,652
|
)
|
$
|
484,162
|
$
|
343,397
|
||||
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from
operations
|
$
|
(6,716,445
|
)
|
$
|
(11,773,112
|
)
|
$
|
6,716,376
|
$
|
(2,066,114
|
)
|
$
|
(3,205,270
|
)
|
||
(Decrease)
Increase in net assets resulting from operations per average outstanding
share
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
$
|
0.36
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
1Included
in total expenses are the following profit-sharing expenses: $0 in
2007,
$50,875
in 2006; $1,796,264 in 2005; and $311,594 in 2004. Also included in total
expenses is non-cash, stock-based compensation expense of $8,050,807 in 2007
and $5,038,956
in 2006. There was no stock-based compensation expense in 2005, 2004, or
2003.
2Included
in total tax expense are the following taxes paid by the Company on behalf
of
shareholders: $0 in each of 2007 and 2006, $8,122,367 in 2005, $0 in each
of
2004 and 2003.
SELECTED
QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
2007
|
|||||||||||||
1st Quarter
|
2nd Quarter
|
3rd Quarter
|
4th Quarter
|
||||||||||
Total
investment income
|
$
|
652,498
|
$
|
637,701
|
$
|
743,414
|
$
|
672,023
|
|||||
Net
operating loss
|
$
|
(2,667,118
|
)
|
$
|
(2,891,667
|
)
|
$
|
(3,117,595
|
)
|
$
|
(3,151,163
|
)
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from
operations
|
$
|
(6,390,160
|
)
|
$
|
(4,093,644
|
)
|
$
|
604,237
|
$
|
3,163,122
|
|||
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from
operations
|
|||||||||||||
Per
average outstanding share
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
$
|
0.03
|
$
|
0.16
|
|||
2006
|
|||||||||||||
1st Quarter
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
|
4th Quarter
|
||||||
Total
investment income
|
$
|
804,862
|
$
|
785,265
|
$
|
719,619
|
$
|
719,015
|
|||||
Net
operating loss
|
$
|
(767,743
|
)
|
$
|
(693,887
|
)
|
$
|
(2,988,790
|
)
|
$
|
(3,162,515
|
)
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from
operations
|
$
|
(1,653,990
|
)
|
$
|
(1,282,997
|
)
|
$
|
(2,588,092
|
)
|
$
|
(6,248,033
|
)
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from
operations
|
|||||||||||||
Per
average outstanding share
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
$
|
(0.31
|
)
|
9
SELECTED
QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
(continued)
2005
|
|||||||||||||
1st Quarter
|
2nd Quarter
|
3rd Quarter
|
4th Quarter
|
||||||||||
Total
investment income
|
$
|
260,108
|
$
|
158,717
|
$
|
315,374
|
$
|
801,662
|
|||||
Net
operating loss
|
$
|
(745,590
|
)
|
$
|
(3,302,094
|
)
|
$
|
(3,273,797
|
)
|
$
|
1,851,274
|
||
Net
increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from
operations
|
$
|
(2,233,447
|
)
|
$
|
7,001,847
|
$
|
7,336,923
|
$
|
(5,388,947
|
)
|
|||
Net
(decrease) increase in net assets resulting from
operations
|
|||||||||||||
Per
average outstanding share
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
$
|
0.41
|
$
|
0.40
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE
The
financial statements as of December 31, 2007, and 2006, and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, have been incorporated
by
reference into the Prospectus from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K,
which either accompanies this Prospectus or has previously been provided
to the
person to whom this Prospectus is being sent.
The
information required by Item 4.2 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" as of December 31, 2007, and
2006, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007,
have been incorporated by reference into the Prospectus from the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K, which either accompanies this Prospectus or has
previously been provided to the person to whom this Prospectus is being
sent.
We
will
furnish, without charge, a copy of the financial statements upon request by
writing to 111 West 57th
Street,
Suite 1100, New York, New York 10019, Attention: Investor Relations, or by
calling 1-877-TINY-TECH.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We
file
annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information
with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can inspect any
materials we file with the SEC, without charge, at the SEC’s Public Reference
Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
202-942-8090 for further information on the Public Reference Room. The SEC
maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy statements and other
information regarding registrants, including us, that file such information
electronically with the SEC. The address of the SEC’s web site is www.sec.gov.
Information contained on the SEC’s web site about us is not incorporated into
this Prospectus and you should not consider information contained on the SEC’s
web site to be part of this Prospectus.
You
may
obtain our annual reports, request other information about us and make
shareholder inquiries by calling toll free 1-877-TINY TECH. We also make
available our annual reports, free of charge, on our website at
www.TinyTechVC.com. Information on our website is not part of this Prospectus
and should not be considered as such when making your investment decision.
10
RISK
FACTORS
Investing
in our Common Stock involves significant risks relating to our business and
investment objective. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties
described below before you purchase any of our Common Stock. These risks and
uncertainties are not the only ones we face. Unknown additional risks and
uncertainties, or ones that we currently consider immaterial, may also impair
our business. If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, our business,
financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely
affected. In this event, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline,
and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
related to the companies in our portfolio.
A
continuing lack of initial public offering opportunities may cause companies
to
stay in our portfolio longer, leading to lower returns, write-downs and
write-offs.
Beginning
in about 2001, many fewer venture capital-backed companies per annum have
been
able to complete initial public offerings (IPOs) than in the years of the
previous decade. Moreover, in 2007, according to Venture Source, the
venture capital-backed companies that completed IPOs had a median age of
about
8.3 years, which was older than the median age of venture capital-backed
IPOs in
any period since 2001-2002. Now that some of our companies are becoming
more mature, a continuing lack of IPO opportunities for venture capital-backed
companies could lead to companies staying longer in our portfolio as private
entities still requiring funding. In the best case, such stagnation would
dampen returns, and in the worst case, could lead to write-downs and write-offs
as some companies run short of cash and have to accept lower valuations in
private fundings or are not able to access additional capital at all. A
continuing lack of IPO opportunities for venture capital-backed companies
is
also causing some venture capital firms to change their strategies, which
is
causing some of them to reduce funding of their portfolio companies, making
it
more difficult for such companies to access capital and to fulfill their
potential, leading in some cases to write-downs and write-offs of such companies
by other venture capital firms, such as ourselves, who are co-investors in
such
companies.
Investing
in small, private companies involves a high degree of risk and is highly
speculative.
We
have
invested a substantial portion of our assets in privately held development
stage
or start-up companies, the securities of which are inherently illiquid. These
businesses tend to lack management depth, to have limited or no history of
operations and to have not attained profitability. Tiny technology companies
are
especially risky, involving scientific, technological and commercialization
risks. Because of the speculative nature of these investments, these securities
have a significantly greater risk of loss than traditional investment
securities. Some of our venture capital investments are likely to be complete
losses or unprofitable, and some will never realize their potential. We have
been and will continue to be risk seeking rather than risk averse in our
approach to venture capital and other investments. Neither our investments
nor
an investment in our Common Stock is intended to constitute a balanced
investment program.
We
may invest in companies working with technologies or intellectual property
that
currently have few or no proven commercial applications.
Nanotechnology,
in particular, is a developing area of technology, of which much of the future
commercial value is unknown, difficult to estimate and subject to widely
varying
interpretations. There are as of yet relatively few nanotechnology-enabled
products commercially available. The timing of additional future commercially
available nanotechnology products is highly uncertain.
11
Our
portfolio companies may not successfully develop, manufacture or market their
products.
The
technology of our portfolio companies is new and in many cases unproven.
Their
potential products require significant and lengthy product development,
manufacturing and marketing efforts. To date, many of our portfolio companies
have not developed any commercially available products. In addition, our
portfolio companies may not be able to manufacture successfully or to market
their products in order to achieve commercial success. Further, the products
may
never gain commercial acceptance. If our portfolio companies are not able
to
develop, manufacture or market successful tiny technology-enabled products,
they
will be unable to generate product revenue or build sustainable or profitable
businesses. Adverse conditions in the target markets of our portfolio companies
may limit or prevent commercial success regardless of the contribution of
tiny
technology to these products.
Our
portfolio companies working with tiny technology may be particularly susceptible
to intellectual property litigation.
Research
and commercialization efforts in tiny technology are being undertaken by a
wide
variety of government, academic and private corporate entities. As additional
commercially viable applications of tiny technology emerge, ownership of
intellectual property on which these products are based may be contested. From
time to time, our portfolio companies are or have been involved in intellectual
property disputes and litigation. Any litigation over the ownership of, or
rights to, any of our portfolio companies’ technologies or products could have a
material adverse effect on those companies’ values.
Unfavorable
general economic conditions, as well as unfavorable conditions specific to
the
venture capital industry
or a segment of portfolio companies, could result in the inability of our
portfolio companies to access additional capital, leading to financial losses
in
our portfolio.
Most
of
the companies in which we have made or will make investments are susceptible
to
economic slowdowns or recessions. An economic slowdown or adverse capital
or
credit market conditions may affect the ability of a company in our portfolio
to
raise additional capital from venture capital or other sources or to engage
in a
liquidity event such as an initial public offering or merger. Certain types
of
portfolio companies, such as those engaged in solar, solid-state lighting
and
other alternative energy (cleantech) applications, which are currently in
favor
with the media and investors generally, may have a harder time accessing
capital
in the future if their industries subsequently fall out of fashion. Adverse
economic, capital or credit market conditions may lead to financial losses
in
our portfolio.
Unstable
credit markets could adversely affect our portfolio
companies.
Although
our portfolio companies rely primarily on equity financing, some of them
borrow
funds as well. Given the current credit environment, there can be no assurance
that portfolio companies will be able to borrow money on a timely basis or
on
reasonable terms, which could have a negative impact on their operating
performance, raise their cost of capital, or even jeopardize their existence.
Furthermore, certain of our portfolio companies manage their cash positions
by
investing in money-market funds, auction-rate securities, or other short-term
securities that are vulnerable to current credit conditions. Lack of liquidity
in such investments, or even defaults by issuers of such securities, could
restrict the amount of cash available to such portfolio companies. These
events
could lead to financial losses in our portfolio.
The
value of our portfolio could be adversely affected if the technologies
utilized by our portfolio companies are found, or even rumored or feared, to
cause health or environmental risks, or if legislation is passed that limits
the
commercialization of any of these technologies.
Nanotechnology
has received both positive and negative publicity and is the subject
increasingly of public discussion and debate. For example, debate regarding
the
production of materials that could cause harm to the environment or the health
of individuals could raise concerns in the public’s perception of
nanotechnology, not all of which might be rational or scientifically based.
Tiny
technology in general and nanotechnology in particular are currently the
subject
of health and environmental impact research. If health or environmental concerns
about tiny technology or nanotechnology
were to
arise, whether or not they had any basis in fact, our portfolio companies
might
incur additional research, legal and regulatory expenses, and might have
difficulty raising capital or marketing their products. Government
authorities could, for social or other purposes, prohibit or regulate the
use of
nanotechnology. Legislation
could be passed that could circumscribe the commercialization of any of these
technologies.
12
Our
portfolio companies may generate revenues from the sale of non-tiny
technology-enabled products.
We
consider a company to be a tiny technology company if a product or products,
or
intellectual property covering a product or products, that we consider to be
at
the microscale or smaller is material to its business plan. The core business
of
some of these companies may not be tiny technology-enabled products, and
therefore their success or failure may not be dependent upon the tiny technology
aspects of their business. In addition to developing products that we consider
tiny technology, some of these companies may also develop products that we
do
not consider enabled by tiny technology. Some of these companies will generate
revenues from the sale of non-tiny technology-enabled products. Additionally,
it
is possible that a portfolio company may decide to change its business focus
after our initial investment and decide to develop and commercialize non-tiny
technology-enabled products.
Risks
related to the illiquidity of our investments.
We
invest in illiquid securities and may not be able to dispose of them when it
is
advantageous to do so, or ever.
Most
of
our investments are or will be equity or equity-linked securities acquired
directly from small companies. These equity securities are generally subject
to
restrictions on resale or otherwise have no established trading market. The
illiquidity of most of our portfolio of equity securities may adversely affect
our ability to dispose of these securities at times when it may be advantageous
for us to liquidate these investments. We may never be able to dispose of these
securities.
Unfavorable
economic conditions and regulatory changes could impair our ability to engage
in
liquidity events.
Our
business of making private equity investments and positioning our portfolio
companies for liquidity events might be adversely affected by current and future
capital markets and economic conditions. The public equity markets currently
provide less opportunity for liquidity events than at times in the past when
there was more robust demand for initial public offerings, even for more mature
technology companies than those in which we typically invest. The potential
for
public market liquidity could further decrease and could lead to an inability
to
realize potential gains or could lead to financial losses in our portfolio
and a
decrease in our revenues, net income and assets. Recent government reforms
affecting publicly traded companies, stock markets, investment banks and
securities research practices have made it more difficult for privately held
companies to complete successful initial public offerings of their equity
securities, and such reforms have increased the expense and legal exposure
of
being a public company. Slowdowns in initial public offerings may also be having
an adverse effect on the frequency and prices of acquisitions of privately
held
companies. A lack of merger and/or acquisition opportunities for privately
held
companies also may be having an adverse effect on the ability of these companies
to raise capital from private sources. Public equity market response to
companies offering nanotechnology-enabled products is uncertain. An inability
to
engage in liquidity events could negatively affect our liquidity, our
reinvestment rate in new and follow-on investments and the value of our
portfolio.
Even
if some of our portfolio companies complete initial public offerings, the
returns on our investments in those companies would be
uncertain.
When
companies in which we have invested as private entities complete initial public
offerings of their securities, these newly issued securities are by definition
unseasoned issues. Unseasoned issues tend to be highly volatile and have
uncertain liquidity, which may negatively affect their price. In addition,
we
are typically subject to lock-up provisions that prohibit us from selling our
investments into the public market for specified periods of time after initial
public offerings. The market price of securities that we hold may decline
substantially before we are able to sell these securities. Most initial public
offerings of technology companies in the United States are listed on the Nasdaq
Global Market. Government reforms of the Nasdaq Global Market have made
market-making by broker-dealers less profitable, which has caused broker-dealers
to reduce their market-making activities, thereby making the market for
unseasoned stocks less liquid than they might be otherwise.
13
Because
there is generally no established market in which to value our investments,
our
Valuation Committee’s value determinations may differ materially from the values
that a ready market or third party would attribute to these
investments.
There
is
generally no public market for the equity securities in which we invest.
Pursuant to the requirements of the 1940 Act, we value all of the private
equity
securities in our portfolio at fair value as determined in good faith by
a
committee of independent members of our Board of Directors, which we call
the
Valuation Committee, pursuant to Valuation Procedures established by the
Board
of Directors. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment
be
applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment
pursuant to specified valuation principles and processes. We are required
by the
1940 Act to value specifically each individual investment on a quarterly
basis
and record unrealized depreciation for an investment that we believe has
become
impaired. Conversely, we must record unrealized appreciation if we believe
that
our securities have appreciated in value. Our valuations, although stated
as a
precise number, are necessarily within a range of values that vary depending
on
the significance attributed to the various factors being
considered.
We
use
the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of warrants
held in our portfolio. Option pricing models, including the Black-Scholes
model,
require the use of subjective input assumptions, including expected volatility,
expected life, expected dividend rate, and expected risk-free rate of return.
In
the Black-Scholes model, variations in the expected volatility or expected
term
assumptions have a significant impact on fair value. Because the securities
underlying the warrants in our portfolio are not publicly traded, many of
the
required input assumptions are more difficult to estimate than they would
be if
a public market for the underlying securities existed.
Without
a
readily ascertainable market value and because of the inherent uncertainty
of
valuation, the fair value that we assign to our investments may differ from
the
values that would have been used had an efficient market existed for the
investments, and the difference could be material. Any changes in fair value
are
recorded in our consolidated statements of operations as a change in the "Net
(decrease) increase in unrealized appreciation on investments." See
"Determination of Net Asset Value."
In
the
venture capital industry, even when a portfolio of early-stage, high-technology
venture capital investments proves to be profitable over the portfolio's
lifetime, it is common for the portfolio's value to undergo a so-called
"J-curve" valuation pattern. This means that when reflected on a graph, the
portfolio’s valuation would appear in the shape of the letter "J," declining
from the initial valuation prior to increasing in valuation. This J-curve
valuation pattern results from write-downs and write-offs of portfolio
investments that appear to be unsuccessful, prior to write-ups for portfolio
investments that prove to be successful. Because early-stage companies typically
have negative cash flow and are by their nature inherently fragile, a valuation
process can more readily substantiate a loss of value than an increase in
value.
Even if our venture capital investments prove to be profitable in the long
run,
such J-curve valuation patterns could have a significant adverse effect on
our
net asset value per share and the value of our Common Stock in the interim.
Over
time, as we continue to make additional tiny technology investments, this
J-curve pattern may be less relevant for our portfolio as a whole, because
the
individual J-curves for each investment, or series of investments, may overlap
with previous investments at different stages of their J-curves.
Changes
in valuations of our privately held, early stage companies tend to be more
volatile than changes in prices of publicly traded
securities.
Investments
in privately held, early stage companies are inherently more volatile than
investments in more mature businesses. Such immature businesses are inherently
fragile and easily affected by both internal and external forces. Our investee
companies can lose much or all of their value suddenly in response to an
internal or external adverse event. Conversely, these immature businesses
can
gain suddenly in value in response to an internal or external positive
development. Moreover, because our ownership interests in such investments
are
valued only at quarterly intervals by our Valuation Committee, a committee
made
up of all of our independent members of our Board of Directors, changes in
valuations from one valuation point to another tend to be larger than changes
in
valuations of marketable securities which are revalued in the marketplace
much
more frequently, in some highly liquid cases, virtually
continuously.
14
We
expect to continue to experience material write-downs of securities of portfolio
companies.
Write-downs
of securities of our privately held companies have always been a by-product
and
risk of our business. We expect to continue to experience material write-downs
of securities of privately held portfolio companies. Write-downs of such
companies occur at all stages of their development. Such write-downs may
increase in dollar terms, frequency and as a percentage of our net asset value
as our dollar investment activity in privately held companies continues to
increase, and the number of such holdings in our portfolio continues to grow.
Because the average size of each of our investments in tiny technology has
increased from year to year and continues to increase, the average size of
our
write-downs will probably also increase.
Because
we do not choose investments based on a strategy of diversification, the
value
of our business is subject to greater volatility than the value of companies
with more broadly diversified investments.
We
do not
choose investments based on a strategy of diversification. Therefore, we
may be
more vulnerable to events affecting a single sector or industry and therefore
subject to greater volatility than a company that follows a diversification
strategy. Accordingly, an investment in our Common Stock may present greater
risk to you than an investment in a diversified company.
We
are dependent upon key management personnel for future success, and may not
be
able to retain them.
We
are
dependent upon the diligence and skill of our senior management and other
key
advisers for the selection, structuring, closing and monitoring of our
investments. We utilize lawyers, and we utilize outside consultants, including
one of our directors, Lori D. Pressman, to assist us in conducting due diligence
when evaluating potential investments. There is generally no publicly available
information about the companies in which we invest, and we rely significantly
on
the diligence of our employees and advisers to obtain information in connection
with our investment decisions. Our future success to a significant extent
depends on the continued service and coordination of our senior management
team,
and particularly on Charles E. Harris, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and
a Managing Director, who will be subject to mandatory retirement pursuant
to the
Company's mandatory retirement policy for senior executives on December 31,
2008; on Douglas W. Jamison, our President, Chief Operating Officer and a
Managing Director, who has been designated by our Board of Directors as the
successor to Mr. Harris in his positions of Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
as of January 1, 2009 upon his retirement; on Daniel B. Wolfe, our Chief
Financial Officer and a Managing Director; on Alexei A. Andreev and Michael
A.
Janse, each an Executive Vice President and Managing Director; and on Sandra
M.
Forman, our General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Director of Human
Resources. The departure of any of our executive officers, key employees
or
advisers could materially adversely affect our ability to implement our business
strategy. We do not maintain for our benefit any key-man life insurance on
any
of our officers or employees.
15
We
will need to hire additional employees as the size of our portfolio
increases.
We
anticipate that it will be necessary for us to add investment professionals
with
expertise in venture capital and/or tiny technology and administrative and
support staff to accommodate the increasing size of our portfolio. We may need
to provide additional scientific, business, accounting, legal or investment
training for our hires. There is competition for highly qualified personnel.
We
may not be successful in our efforts to recruit and retain highly qualified
personnel because the expenses that we incur as a heavily regulated, publicly
held company preclude our paying as high a percentage of our total expenses
in
cash compensation for employees as the private partnerships with which we
compete. Although we have the advantage of offering equity incentive
compensation, unlike those private partnerships, we cannot permit co-investment
in our investments by our employees, and we cannot give our employees 20 percent
or higher carried interests in our investments as incentive compensation taxable
as long-term capital gains.
The
market for venture capital investments, including tiny technology investments,
is highly competitive.
We
face
substantial competition in our investing activities from many competitors,
including but not limited to: private venture capital funds; investment
affiliates of large industrial, technology, service and financial companies;
small business investment companies; hedge funds; wealthy individuals; and
foreign investors. Our most significant competitors typically have significantly
greater financial resources than we do. Greater financial resources are
particularly advantageous in securing lead investor roles in venture capital
syndicates. Lead investors typically negotiate the terms and conditions of
such
financings. Many sources of funding compete for a small number of attractive
investment opportunities. Hence, we face substantial competition in sourcing
good investment opportunities on terms of investment that are commercially
attractive.
In
addition to the difficulty of finding attractive investment opportunities,
our
status as a regulated business development company may hinder our ability to
participate in investment opportunities or to protect the value of existing
investments.
We
are
required to disclose on a quarterly basis the names and business descriptions
of
our portfolio companies and the type and value of our portfolio securities.
Most
of our competitors are not subject to these disclosure requirements. Our
obligation to disclose this information could hinder our ability to invest
in
some portfolio companies. Additionally, other current and future regulations
may
make us less attractive as a potential investor than a competitor not subject
to
the same regulations.
Our
failure to make follow-on investments in our portfolio companies could impair
the value of our portfolio.
Following
an initial investment in a portfolio company, we may make additional investments
in that portfolio company as "follow-on" investments, in order to: (1) increase
or maintain in whole or in part our ownership percentage; (2) exercise warrants,
options or convertible securities that were acquired in the original or
subsequent financing; or (3) attempt to preserve or enhance the value of our
investment.
We
may
elect not to make follow-on investments or lack sufficient funds to make
such
investments. We have the discretion to make any follow-on investments, subject
to the availability of capital resources. The failure to make a follow-on
investment may, in some circumstances, jeopardize the continued viability
of a
portfolio company and our initial investment, or may result in a missed
opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation,
or
may cause us to lose some or all preferred rights pursuant to "pay-to-play"
provisions that have become common in venture capital transactions. These
provisions require proportionate investment in subsequent rounds of financing
in
order to preserve preferred rights such as anti-dilution protection, liquidation
preferences and preemptive rights to invest in future rounds of financing.
Even
if we have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we
may
elect not to make a follow-on investment because we may not want to increase
our
concentration of risk, because we prefer other opportunities or because we
are
inhibited by compliance with business development company requirements or
the
desire to maintain our tax status.
16
Bank
borrowing or the issuance of debt securities or preferred stock by us, to fund
investments in portfolio companies or to fund our operating expenses, would
make
our total return to common shareholders more volatile.
Use
of
debt or preferred stock as a source of capital entails two primary risks. The
first is the risk of leverage, which is the use of debt to increase the pool
of
capital available for investment purposes. The use of debt leverages our
available common equity capital, magnifying the impact on net asset value of
changes in the value of our investment portfolio. For example, a business
development company that uses 33 percent leverage (that is, $50 of leverage
per
$100 of common equity) will show a 1.5 percent increase or decline in net asset
value for each 1 percent increase or decline in the value of its total assets.
The second risk is that the cost of debt or preferred stock financing may exceed
the return on the assets the proceeds are used to acquire, thereby diminishing
rather than enhancing the return to common shareholders. If we issue preferred
shares or debt, the common shareholders would bear the cost of this leverage.
To
the extent that we utilize debt or preferred stock financing for any purpose,
these two risks would likely make our total return to common shareholders more
volatile. In addition, we might be required to sell investments, in order to
meet dividend, interest or principal payments, when it might be disadvantageous
for us to do so.
As
provided in the 1940 Act and subject to some exceptions, we can issue debt
or
preferred stock so long as our total assets immediately after the issuance,
less
some ordinary course liabilities, exceed 200 percent of the sum of the debt
and
any preferred stock outstanding. The debt or preferred stock may be convertible
in accordance with SEC guidelines, which might permit us to obtain leverage
at
more attractive rates. The requirement under the 1940 Act to pay, in full,
dividends on preferred shares or interest on debt before any dividends may
be
paid on our Common Stock means that dividends on our Common Stock from earnings
may be reduced or eliminated. An inability to pay dividends on our Common Stock
could conceivably result in our ceasing to qualify as a regulated investment
company, or RIC, under the Code, which would in most circumstances be materially
adverse to the holders of our Common Stock. As of the date hereof, we do not
have any debt or preferred stock outstanding.
We
are authorized to issue preferred stock, which would convey special rights
and
privileges to its owners senior to those of Common Stock
shareholders.
We
are
currently authorized to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, under
terms and conditions determined by our Board of Directors. These shares would
have a preference over our Common Stock with respect to dividends and
liquidation. The statutory class voting rights of any preferred shares we would
issue could make it more difficult for us to take some actions that might,
in
the future, be proposed by the Board and/or holders of Common Stock, such as
a
merger, exchange of securities, liquidation or alteration of the rights of
a
class of our securities, if these actions were perceived by the holders of
the
preferred shares as not in their best interests. The issuance of preferred
shares convertible into shares of Common Stock might also reduce the net income
and net asset value per share of our Common Stock upon conversion.
Loss
of status as a RIC would reduce our net asset value and distributable
income.
We
currently intend to qualify as a RIC for 2008 under the Code. As a RIC, we
do
not have to pay federal income taxes on our income (including realized gains)
that is distributed to our shareholders. Accordingly, we are not permitted
under
accounting rules to establish reserves for taxes on our unrealized capital
gains. If we failed to qualify for RIC status in 2008 or beyond, to the extent
that we had unrealized gains, we would have to establish reserves for taxes,
which would reduce our net asset value, accordingly. In addition, if we,
as a
RIC, were to decide to make a deemed distribution of net realized capital
gains
and retain the net realized capital gains, we would have to establish
appropriate reserves for taxes that we would have to pay on behalf of
shareholders. It is possible that establishing reserves for taxes could have
a
material adverse effect on the value of our Common Stock. See
"Taxation."
17
We
operate in a heavily regulated environment, and changes to, or non-compliance
with, regulations and laws could harm our business.
We
are
subject to substantive SEC regulations as a business development company.
Securities and tax laws and regulations governing our activities may change
in
ways adverse to our and our shareholders’ interests, and interpretations of
these laws and regulations may change with unpredictable consequences. Any
change in the laws or regulations that govern our business could have an
adverse
impact on us or on our operations. Changing laws, regulations and standards
relating to corporate governance, valuation and public disclosure, including
the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations, new federal accounting
standards and Nasdaq Global Market rules, are creating additional expense
and
uncertainty for publicly held companies in general, and for business development
companies in particular. These new or changed laws, regulations and standards
are subject to varying interpretations in many cases because of their lack
of
specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve over
time, which may well result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance
matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure
and
governance practices.
We
are
committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public
disclosure. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations
and standards have and will continue to result in increased general and
administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from
revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In particular, our
efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the
related regulations regarding our required assessment of our internal controls
over financial reporting and our external auditors' audit of that assessment
has
required the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources.
Moreover,
even though business development companies are not mutual funds, they must
comply with several of the regulations applicable to mutual funds, such as
the
requirement for the implementation of a comprehensive compliance program and
the
appointment of a Chief Compliance Officer. Further, our Board members, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer could face an increased risk
of
personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a
result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified board members
and executive officers, which could harm our business, and we have significantly
increased both our coverage under, and the related expense for, directors'
and
officers' liability insurance. If our efforts to comply with new or changed
laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by
regulatory or governing bodies, our reputation may be harmed. Also, as business
and financial practices continue to evolve, they may render the regulations
under which we operate less appropriate and more burdensome than they were
when
originally imposed. This increased regulatory burden is causing us to incur
significant additional expenses and is time consuming for our management, which
could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.
Market
prices of our Common Stock will continue to be volatile.
We
expect
that the market price of our Common Stock will continue to be volatile. The
price of the Common Stock may be higher or lower than the price you pay for
your
shares, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and
may
not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include
the
following:
·
|
stock
market and capital markets
conditions;
|
·
|
internal
developments in our Company with respect to our personnel, financial
condition and compliance with all applicable
regulations;
|
·
|
announcements
regarding any of our portfolio
companies;
|
·
|
announcements
regarding developments in the nanotechnology field in
general;
|
·
|
environmental
and health concerns regarding nanotechnology, whether real or
perceptual;
|
18
·
|
announcements
regarding government funding and initiatives related to the development
of nanotechnology;
|
·
|
general
economic conditions and trends;
and/or
|
·
|
departures
of key personnel.
|
We
will
not have control over many of these factors, but expect that our stock price
may
be influenced by them. As a result, our stock price may be volatile, and you
may
lose all or part of your investment.
Quarterly
results fluctuate and are not indicative of future quarterly
performance.
Our
quarterly operating results fluctuate as a result of a number of factors. These
factors include, among others, variations in and the timing of the recognition
of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we and our
portfolio companies encounter competition in our markets and general economic
and capital markets conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any
one quarter should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in
future quarters.
To
the extent that we do not realize income or choose not to retain after-tax
realized capital gains, we will have a greater need for additional capital
to
fund our investments and operating expenses.
As
a RIC,
we must annually distribute at least 90 percent of our investment company
taxable income as a dividend and may either distribute or retain our realized
net capital gains from investments. As a result, these earnings may not be
available to fund investments. If we fail to generate net realized capital
gains
or to obtain funds from outside sources, it would have a material adverse
effect
on our financial condition and results of operations as well as our ability
to
make follow-on and new investments. Because of the structure and objectives
of
our business, we generally expect to experience net operating losses and
rely on
proceeds from sales of investments, rather than on investment income, to
defray
a significant portion of our operating expenses. These sales are unpredictable
and may not occur. In addition, as a business development company, in order
to
pay dividends or repurchase shares, we are generally required to maintain
a
ratio of at least 200 percent of total assets to total borrowings and preferred
stock, which may restrict our ability to borrow to fund these requirements.
Lack
of capital could curtail our investment activities or impair our working
capital.
Investment
in foreign securities could result in additional risks.
We
may
invest in foreign securities, and we currently have one investment in a foreign
security. When we invest in securities of foreign issuers, we may be subject
to
risks not usually associated with owning securities of U.S. issuers. These
risks
can include fluctuations in foreign currencies, foreign currency exchange
controls, social, political and economic instability, differences in securities
regulation and trading, expropriation or nationalization of assets and foreign
taxation issues. In addition, changes in government administrations or economic
or monetary policies in the United States or abroad could result in appreciation
or depreciation of our securities and could favorably or unfavorably affect
our
operations. It may also be more difficult to obtain and enforce a judgment
against a foreign issuer. Any foreign investments made by us must be made in
compliance with U.S. and foreign currency restrictions and tax laws restricting
the amounts and types of foreign investments.
Although
most of our investments are denominated in U.S. dollars, our investments that
are denominated in a foreign currency are subject to the risk that the value
of
a particular currency may change in relation to the U.S. dollar, in which
currency we maintain financial statements and valuations. Among the factors
that
may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest
rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies,
long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation and political
developments.
19
Risks
related to this offering.
Investing
in our stock is highly speculative and an investor could lose some or all of
the
amount invested.
Our
investment objective and strategies result in a high degree of risk in our
investments and may result in losses in the value of our investment portfolio.
Our investments in portfolio companies are highly speculative and, therefore,
an
investor in our Common Stock may lose his or her entire investment. The value
of
our Common Stock may decline and may be affected by numerous market conditions,
which could result in the loss of some or all of the amount invested in our
Common Stock. The securities markets frequently experience extreme price and
volume fluctuations that affect market prices for securities of companies in
general, and technology and very small capitalization companies in particular.
Because of our focus on the technology and very small capitalization sectors,
and because we are a very small capitalization company ourselves, our stock
price is especially likely to be affected by these market conditions. General
economic conditions, and general conditions in tiny technology in general and
nanotechnology in particular and in the semi-conductor and information
technology, life sciences, materials science and other high technology
industries, may also affect the price of our Common Stock.
We
will have discretion over the use of proceeds of this
offering.
We
will
have flexibility in applying the proceeds of this offering. We may pay operating
expenses, including due diligence expenses on potential new investments, from
the net proceeds. Our ability to achieve our investment objective may be limited
to the extent that the net proceeds of the offering, pending full investment,
are used to pay operating expenses.
Our
shares might trade at discounts from net asset value or at premiums that are
unsustainable
over the long term.
Shares
of
business development companies like us may, during some periods, trade at
prices
higher than their net asset value and during other periods, as frequently
occurs
with closed-end investment companies, trade at prices lower than their net
asset
value. The possibility that our shares will trade at discounts from net asset
value or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term are risks
separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share will
decrease. The risk of purchasing shares of a business development company
that
might trade at a discount or unsustainable premium is more pronounced for
investors who wish to sell their shares in a relatively short period of time
because, for those investors, realization of a gain or loss on their investments
is likely to be more dependent upon changes in premium or discount levels
than
upon increases or decreases in net asset value per share. Our Common Stock
may
not trade at a price higher than or equal to net asset value per share. On
December 31, 2007, our stock closed at $8.79 per share, a premium of $2.86
over
our net asset value per share of $5.93 as of December 31,
2007.
The
Board of Directors intends to grant stock options to our
employees pursuant to the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan. When exercised, these
options may have a dilutive effect on existing
shareholders.
In
accordance with the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan, the Company’s Compensation
Committee may grant options from time to time for up to 20 percent of the
total
shares of stock issued and outstanding. When options are exercised, net asset
value per share will decrease if the net asset value per share at the time
of
exercise is higher than the exercise price. Alternatively, net asset value
per
share will increase if the net asset value per share at the time of exercise
is
lower than the exercise price. Therefore, existing shareholders will be diluted
if the net asset value per share at the time of exercise is higher than the
exercise price of the options. Even though issuance of shares pursuant to
exercises of options increases the Company's capital, and regardless of whether
such issuance results in increases or decreases in net asset value per share,
such issuance results in existing shareholders owning a smaller percentage
of
the shares outstanding.
20
You
have no right to require us to repurchase your shares.
You
do
not have the right to require us to repurchase your shares of Common
Stock.
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
This
Prospectus may contain "forward-looking statements" based on our current
expectations, assumptions and estimates about us and our industry. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as
"believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "will," "may,"
"might," "could," "continue" and other similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to
expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or
circumstances are forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ
materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result
of several factors more fully described in "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in
this
Prospectus. The forward-looking statements made in this Prospectus relate only
to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no
obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason,
even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
You
should understand that under Sections 27A(b)(2)(B) and (D) of the Securities
Act
of 1933 and Sections 21E(b)(2)(B) and (D) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995 may not as a technical matter apply to statements made in connection
with this offering.
USE
OF PROCEEDS
We
estimate the total net proceeds of the offering to be up to $27,348,400 based
on
the last reported price for our Common Stock on April 1, 2008 of
$7.34.
We
expect
to invest or reserve for potential follow-on investment the net proceeds of
any
offering within two years from the completion of such offering. The net proceeds
of this offering invested after two years will only be used for follow-on
investments. Reserves for follow-on investments in any particular initial
investment may be no more than the greater of twice the investment to date
or
five times the initial investment in the case of seed-stage investments, though
we may invest more than the amount reserved for this purpose in any particular
portfolio holding. Although we intend to make our initial investments
exclusively in companies that we believe are involved significantly in tiny
technology, we may also make follow-on investments in existing portfolio
companies involved in other technologies. Pending investment in portfolio
companies, we intend to invest the net proceeds of any offering of our Common
Stock in time deposits and/or income-producing securities that are issued or
guaranteed by the federal government or an agency of the federal government
or
a
government-owned corporation, which may well yield less than our operating
expense ratio. We
may
also use the proceeds of this offering for operating expenses, including due
diligence expenses on potential investments. Our portfolio companies rarely
pay
us dividends or interest, and we do not generate enough income from fixed income
investments to meet all of our operating expenses. If
we pay
operating expenses from the proceeds, it will reduce the net proceeds of the
offering that we will have available for investment.
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our
Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol "TINY."
The
following table sets forth for the quarters indicated, the high and low sale
prices on the Nasdaq Global Market per share of our Common Stock and the net
asset value and the premium or discount from net asset value per share at which
the shares of Common Stock were trading, expressed as a percentage of net asset
value, at each of the high and low sale prices provided.
21
Market Price
|
Net Asset Value
("NAV") Per Share
|
Premium or Discount as a
% of NAV
|
||||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended
|
High
|
Low
|
at End of Period
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||||||
March
31, 2006
|
16.10
|
12.75
|
5.60
|
187.5
|
127.7
|
|||||||||||
June
30, 2006
|
14.26
|
9.57
|
5.54
|
157.4
|
72.7
|
|||||||||||
September
30, 2006
|
12.99
|
9.38
|
5.54
|
134.5
|
69.3
|
|||||||||||
December
31, 2006
|
15.16
|
11.80
|
5.42
|
179.7
|
117.7
|
|||||||||||
March
31, 2007
|
13.58
|
11.00
|
5.27
|
157.7
|
108.7
|
|||||||||||
June
30, 2007
|
14.32
|
11.01
|
5.54
|
158.5
|
98.7
|
|||||||||||
September
30, 2007
|
11.79
|
9.51
|
5.69
|
107.2
|
67.1
|
|||||||||||
December
31, 2007
|
11.10
|
8.00
|
5.93
|
87.2
|
34.9
|
|||||||||||
March
31, 2008
|
7.25
|
7.04
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Historically,
the shares of our Common Stock have traded at times at a discount and at
other
times at a premium to net asset value. Since 2003, our shares of Common Stock
have traded at a premium to net asset value. The last reported price for
our
Common Stock on April 1, 2008 was $7.34 per share. As of April 1, 2008, we
had
approximately 134 shareholders of record.
22
BUSINESS
We
are a
venture capital company specializing in tiny technology. We were incorporated
as
a New York corporation in 1981. In 1995, we elected to be regulated as a
business development company under the 1940 Act. Our investment objective is
to
achieve long-term capital appreciation, rather than current income, by making
venture capital investments in early-stage companies. Although our portfolio
includes insignificant non-tiny technology investments made prior to 2001,
we
now make our initial investments exclusively in tiny technology companies.
By
making these investments, we seek to provide our shareholders with a specific
focus on tiny technology through a portfolio of venture capital investments
that
address a variety of markets and products. We believe that we are the only
publicly traded business development company making initial venture capital
investments exclusively in tiny technology.
Nanotechnology,
microsystems and microelectromechanical systems, (MEMS), are often referred
to
collectively as "tiny technology," or "small technology," by scientists and
others in this field. Nanotechnology in particular is multidisciplinary and
widely applicable, and it incorporates technology that is significantly smaller
than is currently in widespread commercial use. Microsystems are measured in
micrometers, which are units of measurement in millionths of a meter.
Nanotechnology is measured in nanometers, which are units of measurement in
billionths of a meter. Because it is a new field, tiny technology, and
particularly nanotechnology, has significant scientific, engineering, regulatory
and commercialization risks.
Tiny
technology, particularly nanotechnology, is distinguished by its applicability
to a wide range of industries. As a venture capital company, we make it
possible, through the ownership of our shares, for our shareholders to
participate in this emerging field at an earlier stage than would typically
be
possible for them. By making investments in companies that control intellectual
property relevant to tiny technology, we are building a portfolio that we
believe will be difficult to replicate, as we believe it will likely become
increasingly difficult to create new foundational intellectual property in
nanotechnology.
As
is
usual in the venture capital industry, our venture capital investments are
primarily in convertible preferred stock, which is usually the most senior
security in a portfolio company’s equity capital structure until the company has
substantial revenues, and which gives us seniority over the holders of Common
Stock (usually including the founders) while preserving fully our participation
in the upside potential of the portfolio company through the conversion feature
and, in many cases, a dividend right payable in kind (which increases our
participation in the portfolio company) or potentially in cash.
We
have a
long history of investing in venture capital and of business development. Our
approach is traditional, including a patient examination of available early
stage opportunities, thorough due diligence and close involvement with
management. Unlike most private equity and venture capital funds, we will not
be
subject to any requirement to return capital to investors. Such requirements
typically stipulate that these funds can only be invested once and, together
with any capital gains on such investment, must be returned to investors, net
of
fees and carried interest in profits, after a pre-agreed time period. These
provisions may cause private equity and venture capital funds to seek
investments that are likely to be able to be sold relatively quickly or to
seek
returns on their investments through mergers, public equity offerings or other
liquidity events more quickly than they otherwise might. Because we typically
invest as part of a syndicate of venture capital firms, their time horizons
often determine ours, though we may provide seed capital before forming a
syndicate with other investors, or maintain our investment in an investee
company after it goes public, even after our co-investors sell or distribute
their shares.
In
addition, to the investor, we offer:
·
|
a
portfolio consisting of investments that are generally available
only to a
small, highly specialized group of professional venture capital firms
as
investors;
|
·
|
a
qualified team of professionals, including six full-time members
of
management, five of whom are designated as Managing Directors:
Charles E.
Harris, Douglas W. Jamison, Alexei A. Andreev, Michael A. Janse
and Daniel
B. Wolfe, and a Vice President, Misti Ushio, to evaluate and monitor
investments. One of our directors is also a consultant to us, Lori
D.
Pressman. These seven professionals collectively have expertise
in venture
capital, intellectual property and tiny technology to evaluate
and monitor
investments;
|
23
·
|
the
opportunity to benefit from our experience in a new field expected
to
permeate a variety of industries; and
|
·
|
through
the ownership of our publicly traded shares, a measure of liquidity
not
available in typical underlying venture capital portfolio
investments.
|
While
we
intend to make initial investments exclusively in companies that we believe
are
involved significantly in tiny technology, we may also make follow-on
investments in existing non-tiny technology portfolio companies. The balance
of
our funds is primarily invested in short-term U.S. government and agency
securities. We are an internally managed investment company because our officers
and employees, under the general supervision of our Board of Directors, control
our operations. We have no investment adviser.
Subject
to our compliance with business development company and tax code requirements,
there are no limitations on the types of securities or other assets, foreign
or
domestic, in which we may invest. Investments may include the
following:
·
|
equity,
equity-related securities (including warrants) and debt with equity
features from either private or public issuers, whether in corporate,
partnership or other form, including development stage or start-up
entities;
|
·
|
debt
obligations of all types having varying terms with respect to security
or
credit support, subordination, purchase price, interest payments
and
maturity; and
|
·
|
to
a limited extent, intellectual property, including patents, research
and
development in technology or product development that may lead to
patents
or other marketable technology.
|
Neither
our investments nor an investment in our securities constitutes a balanced
investment program. We have been and will continue to be risk seeking rather
than risk averse in our investment approach. We reserve the fullest possible
freedom of action regarding the types of investments we make and our
relationship with our portfolio companies, subject to our certificate of
incorporation, applicable law and regulations, and policy statements described
herein. Our tiny technology investment policy is not a "fundamental policy"
under the 1940 Act and, accordingly, may be changed without shareholder
approval, although we will give shareholders at least 60 days prior written
notice of any change.
Our
business is subject to federal regulation under the 1940 Act, under which
we
have elected to operate as a business development company. As a business
development company, we are subject to regulatory requirements, the most
significant of which relate to our investments and borrowings. The 1940 Act
provides that we may not make an investment in non-qualifying assets unless
at
the time at least 70 percent of the value of our total assets (measured as
of
the date of our most recently filed financial statements) consists of qualifying
assets. We must also maintain a coverage ratio of assets to senior securities
(such as debt and preferred stock) of at least 200 percent immediately after
giving effect to the issuance of any senior securities. We are also required
to
offer managerial assistance to our portfolio companies, in addition to our
investment. For tax purposes, we are a RIC under the Code.
We
believe that increasing the size of our assets should lower our expenses as
a
proportion of average net assets because some of our costs, such as
administration and public company expenses, are fixed and can be spread over
a
larger asset base and will decline as a percentage of assets as our assets
increase. In addition, with more assets, we expect the average size of our
investments to increase. Each due diligence investigation entails expenses
whether or not we complete the transaction, and the cost of due diligence,
negotiation and documentation of our investments does not vary proportionately
with the size of the investment or intended investment.
24
Some
expenses are expected to increase as new investments are made. We plan to add
personnel to enable us to enlarge the scope of our activities and our expertise
in tiny technology, and our hiring of new employees will increase with more
assets under management. We also believe that a larger number of outstanding
shares and a larger number of beneficial owners of shares could increase the
level of our visibility and improve the trading liquidity of our shares on
the
Nasdaq Global Market. We may not realize any of these benefits.
Historical
Investment Track Record
We
incorporated under the laws of the State of New York in August 1981. In 1983,
we
invested in Otisville BioTech, Inc. Since our investment in Otisville in
1983
through December 31, 2007, we have made a total of 80 venture capital
investments, including four private placement investments in securities of
publicly traded companies (PIPES). We have sold 45 of these 80 investments,
realizing total proceeds of $143,737,906 on our invested capital of $51,229,202.
As measured from first dollar in to last dollar out, the average and median
holding periods for these 45 investments were 3.69 years and 3.11 years,
respectively. As measured by the 150 separate rounds of investment within
these
45 investments, the average and median holding periods for the 150 separate
rounds of investment were 2.87 years and 2.49 years, respectively. Nineteen
of
the 45 investments sold were profitable. The average and median holding periods,
as measured from first dollar in, of these 19 profitable investments were
3.97
years and 3.35 years, respectively. Of these 19 profitable investments, seven
were profitable sales after initial public offerings (IPOs), eight were
profitable mergers and acquisitions transactions and four were profitable
sales
of PIPES. As measured from first dollar in, the average holding period for
profitable exits after IPOs, mergers and acquisitions transactions and PIPES
were 4.26 years, 4.06 years and 1.07 years, respectively.
Twenty-six
of the 45 investments sold were unprofitable. Twenty-five of these investments
were unprofitable non-IPO disposals, and we sold one investment, Princeton
Video
Image, Inc., that had had an IPO, at a loss. As measured from the first dollar
in, the average holding period for the 25 unprofitable non-IPO exits was
3.33
years and the holding period for the unprofitable IPO exit was 7.74 years.
Below
is a list of holding periods for our eight historical IPOs. As measured from
first dollar in to IPO date, the average and median holding periods were
4.56
years and 3.88 years, respectively.
Historical
IPOs
|
Holding
Period to IPO
(yrs)
|
|
|
Alliance
Pharmaceutical Corporation
|
6.39
|
Ag
Services of America, Inc.
|
1.39
|
Molten
Metal Technology, Inc.
|
3.25
|
Nanophase
Technologies Corporation
|
3.07
|
Princeton
Video Image, Inc. (formerly Princeton Electronic
Billboard)
|
6.63
|
SciQuest,
Inc. (formerly BioSupplyNet)
|
3.09
|
Genomica
Corporation
|
4.52
|
NeuroMetrix,
Inc.
|
8.14
|
Average
|
4.56
|
Median
|
3.88
|
In
1994,
we invested in our first nanotechnology company, Nanophase Technologies
Corporation. Recognizing the potential of tiny technology, we continued to
monitor developments in the field, and since 2001 we have made tiny technology
the exclusive focus of our initial investment activity. From August 2001
through
December 2007, all 38 of our initial investments have been in companies involved
in the development of products and technologies based on tiny technology.
25
At
December 31, 2007, the remaining tiny technology venture capital investments
in
our portfolio, including one we invested in initially in 1994, were valued
at
$78,110,384, or 56.5 percent of our net assets, including net unrealized
depreciation of $4,567,144. At December 31, 2007, we had 30 active tiny
technology companies in our portfolio, and from first dollar in, the average
and
median holding periods for these 30 venture capital investments were 3.01
years
and 2.82 years, respectively.
Tiny
Technology Companies in Our Active Portfolio as of
12-31-07
|
Holding
Period (yrs)
|
|
|
Adesto
Technologies Corporation
|
0.86
|
Ancora
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
|
0.66
|
BioVex
Group, Inc.
|
0.26
|
BridgeLux,
Inc. (formerly eLite Optoelectronics, Inc.)
|
2.62
|
Cambrios,
Inc.
|
3.14
|
Crystal
IS, Inc.
|
3.28
|
CSwitch,
Inc.
|
3.60
|
D-Wave
Systems, Inc.
|
1.70
|
Ensemble
Discovery Corporation
|
0.57
|
Innovalight,
Inc.
|
1.70
|
Kereos,
Inc.
|
2.62
|
Kovio,
Inc.
|
2.15
|
Lifco,
Inc.
|
0.53
|
Mersana
Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly Nanopharma Corporation)
|
5.88
|
Metabolon,
Inc.
|
1.98
|
Molecular
Imprints, Inc.
|
3.76
|
NanoGram
Corporation
|
4.67
|
Nanomix,
Inc.
|
3.03
|
Nanosys,
Inc.
|
4.74
|
Nantero,
Inc.
|
6.40
|
NeoPhotonics
Corporation 2004
|
4.07
|
Nextreme
Thermal Solutions, Inc.
|
3.07
|
Phoenix
Molecular, Inc.
|
0.21
|
Polatis,
Inc. (formerly Continuum Photonics, Inc.)
|
5.52
|
Questech
Corporation (formerly Intaglio, Ltd.)
|
13.61
|
Siluria
Technologies, Inc.
|
0.21
|
SiOnyx,
Inc.
|
1.64
|
Solazyme,
Inc.
|
3.10
|
Starfire
Systems, Inc.
|
3.65
|
Xradia,
Inc.
|
1.00
|
Average
|
3.01
|
Median
|
2.82
|
Tiny
Technology
Tiny
technology refers to nanotechnology, microsystems and MEMS, a variety of
enabling technologies with critical dimensions below 100 micrometers. In
our
view, tiny technology is neither an industry nor a single technology. Tiny
technology manifests itself in tools, materials, systems and devices that
address broad markets, including instrumentation, alternative energy,
electronics, photonics, computing, medical devices, pharmaceutical
manufacturing, drug delivery and drug discovery. The development and
commercialization of tiny technology often require the integration of multiple
disciplines, including biology, physics, chemistry, materials science, computer
science and the engineering sciences.
26
Examples
of tiny technology-enabled products currently on the market are quite diverse.
They include sensors, accelerometers used in automobiles to sense impact
and
deploy airbags, cosmetics with ingredients that block ultraviolet light but
are
invisible to the human eye, nanoclays used for strength in the running boards
of
minivans, textiles with liquid-stain repellant surfaces, fast-acting painkillers
and pharmaceutical therapeutics.
The
following is a summary of the products currently released or under development
by our active portfolio companies:
Tiny
Technology Companies in Our Portfolio as of 12-31-07
|
Products
Released / Available for Purchase
|
|
Products
in Development
|
|
Adesto
Technologies
|
Semiconductor
products
|
|||
Ancora
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
|
Custom
carbohydrate synthesis projects
|
Synthetic
carbohydrates for
Pharmaceutical
markets
|
||
BioVex
Group, Inc.
|
Novel
biologics for treatment of cancer and infectious
disease
|
|||
BridgeLux,
Inc. (formerly eLite Optoelectronics, Inc.)
|
High
brightness LEDs
|
Additional
colors and types of HB-LEDs
|
||
Cambrios,
Inc.
|
Transparent
conductors
|
|||
Crystal
IS, Inc.
|
Aluminum
Nitride Substrates
|
High-performance
UV Devices
|
||
CSwitch,
Inc.
|
High-bandwidth
Configurable Switches
|
|||
D-Wave
Systems, Inc.
|
High-speed
analog / quantum computing
|
|||
Ensemble
Discovery Corporation
|
DNA
Programmed Chemistry for Discovery of New Therapeutics
|
|||
Innovalight,
Inc.
|
Thin-film
photovaltics modules
|
|||
Kereos,
Inc.
|
Emulsion-based
targeted therapeutics and molecular imaging agents
|
|||
Kovio,
Inc.
|
Semiconductor
products using printed electronics.
|
|||
Lifco,
Inc.
|
Primary
and rechargeable batteries
|
|||
Mersana
Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly Nanopharma Corporation)
|
Oncology-focused
therapeutic products
|
|||
Metabolon,
Inc.
|
Metabolomics
profiling services, Mselect and MProve Clinical
|
Biomarker
discovery and diagnostic tools
|
||
Molecular
Imprints, Inc.
|
Tools
for nanoimprint lithography
|
Production
scale tools for nanoimprint lithography
|
||
NanoGram
Corporation
|
Tools
and service business for discovery and production of
nanoparticles
|
Application
specific nanoparticles
|
||
Nanomix,
Inc.
|
Carbon-nanotube
based hydrogen sensors.
|
Carbon-nanotube
based sensors
|
||
27
Tiny
Technology Companies in Our Portfolio as of 12-31-07
|
Products
Released / Available for Purchase
|
|
Products
in Development
|
|
|
|
|||
Nanosys,
Inc.
|
Nanotechnology-enabled
products for optical and life science applications
|
Flexible
electronic devices, non-volatile memory, consumables for life sciences
and
fuel cells
|
||
Nantero,
Inc.
|
Carbon-nanotube
based non-volatile memory
|
|||
NeoPhotonics
Corporation
|
Active
and passive optical components for optical networking
|
Additional
products for optical networking
|
||
Nextreme
Thermal Solutions, Inc.
|
Embedded
thermoelectric cooler (eTEC) and UPF Optocooler and cooling LEDs
and laser
diodes
|
Thermoelectric
devices for thermal management of integrated circuits and for power
generation
|
||
Phoenix
Molecular, Inc.
|
Products
for the separation of chiral molecules
|
|||
Polatis,
Inc. (formerly Continuum Photonics, Inc.)
|
Microelectromechanical-enabled
optical switches
|
Additional
optical switching products
|
||
Questech
Corporation (formerly Intaglio, Ltd.)
|
Decorative
tiles made of stone and microscale-metal materials
|
|||
Siluria
Technologies, Inc.
|
Nanomaterial-enabled
products for a diverse set of markets
|
|||
SiOnyx,
Inc.
|
Optical
detectors for detection and imaging of visible and infrared
light
|
|||
Solazyme,
Inc.
|
Algae-produced
oil for biodiesel
|
Algae-produced
products including nutraceuticals, industrial chemicals and
energy
|
||
Starfire
Systems, Inc.
|
Ceramic
brake rotors and pads and silicon-carbide polymers
|
Ceramic-based
parts for applications in electronics, aerospace and automotive
industries
|
||
Xradia,
Inc.
|
3-D
x-ray transmission and x-ray fluorescence microscopes and
optics
|
Additional
x-ray imaging tools
|
||
Within
tiny technology, nanotechnology refers to devices and processes with critical
dimensions below 0.1 micron, equal to 100 nanometers. A nanometer is 0.000000001
meter, or one billionth of a meter. It is at the scale below 100 nanometers,
the
nanoscale, that quantum effects begin to dominate classical macroscale physics.
At the nanoscale, size- and shape-dependent properties of materials allow
previously unattainable material and device performance. Microsystems and MEMS
both refer to materials, devices and processes that are on a micrometer size
scale. A micrometer, which is also referred to as a micron, is 0.000001 meter,
or one millionth of a meter. In practice, any device, or device enabled by
components, in a size range from 100 microns down to 0.1 micron may be
considered "micro."
Nanotechnology
There
are
various definitions of nanotechnology. Regardless of the definition used, the
technology being defined qualifies as tiny technology. A commonly used measure
of nanotechnology includes all materials, devices and processes with critical
dimensions below 100 nanometers. Nanotechnology is defined by the U.S.
Government’s National Nanotechnology Initiative as research and technology
development at the atomic, molecular or macromolecular levels, in the length
scale of approximately 1 - 100 nanometer range, to provide a fundamental
understanding of phenomena and materials at the nanoscale and to create and
use
structures, devices and systems that have novel properties and functions because
of their small and/or intermediate size.
28
The
nanoscale is the scale at which quantum effects begin to dominate classical
macroscale physics. At the nanoscale, size- and shape-dependent properties
of
materials allow heretofore unattainable material and device performance.
Nanotechnology science and its implications are currently the subject of intense
research and development efforts in governmental, academic and corporate
sectors, in the United States and in other countries.
Government
research funding and patenting activity, prerequisites to successful
commercialization of nanotechnology, have been growing rapidly in recent years.
Currently, researchers in the field are collaborating with entrepreneurs and
venture capitalists to form companies around nanotechnology platforms. The
first
generation of nanotechnology products consists of instrumentation that permits
visualization and manipulation of matter at the nanoscale, as well as passive
nanostructures such as coatings, nanoparticles and polymers. Examples of
commercial instrumentation include nanoimprint lithography equipment, new
variations of the atomic force microscope and highly sensitive gene and protein
detecting arrays. Examples of commercial nanostructures include cosmetics with
ingredients that block ultraviolet light but that are invisible to the human
eye, nanoclays used for strength in the running boards of minivans, textiles
with liquid-stain repellant surfaces and fast-acting painkillers.
We
believe that the next generation of nanotechnology products will likely consist
of active nanostructures, including transistors, targeted drugs and chemicals,
actuators and adaptive structures. Examples of products being developed include
semiconductor nanowires that act as tiny transistors; functionalized,
drug-delivering polymers that allow the release of therapeutics to be controlled
by temperature, pH or a magnetic field at specified locations within the body;
and engineered membrane structures for filtration.
We
project that longer-term product opportunities may include integrated
nanosystems involving heterogeneous nanocomponents and various assembling
techniques. Patent applications explaining the science of these discoveries
have
recently been filed, and the first commercial entities formed to develop these
technologies are emerging from universities, federal government labs and
industrial research centers. Future product opportunities may include
exponentially denser and faster electronic devices, with individual molecules
acting as transistors; tissues and organs engineered from self-assembling
polymers that form biomimetic structures; and new forms of computing developed
by exploiting the superposition of quantum particles.
Microsystems
Microsystems
are similar to MEMS, but without mechanical parts. Microsystems are microscale
machines that sense information from the environment and provide a response
to
it. A microsystem often integrates mechanical, fluidic, optical and pneumatic
components into a single system.
Examples
of two established microsystem technologies include microarrays and
lab-on-a-chip. Microarrays can identify thousands of genes simultaneously and
usually perform one type of analysis multiple times. Lab-on-a-chip is a small
chip containing microfluidic channels that quickly separate liquids and gases
in
order to permit microsensors to analyze the properties of the liquids and gases.
The following are additional fields in which microsystems are currently being
used:
·
|
Military/Aerospace
— telemetry, communications, guidance systems, control circuitry and
avionics.
|
·
|
Geophysical
Exploration — seismic data acquisition and geophysical measurement
equipment.
|
·
|
Medical
Instrumentation — instrument motor controls and diagnostic
devices.
|
·
|
Satellite
Systems — power monitoring and control
circuits.
|
·
|
Industrial
Electronic Systems — measurement and diagnostics on rotating
machinery.
|
29
·
|
Opto-Electronics
— sub-miniature temperature controls and laser diode drivers for data
transmission.
|
MEMS
MEMS
often refers to three-dimensional devices with features between one and 100
microns that integrate electrical and mechanical structures. MEMS devices often
contain a combination of sensors, actuators, mechanical structures and
electronics that detect or respond to thermal, biological, chemical or optical
information. To date, most commercial MEMS devices are batch fabricated out
of
silicon, using techniques based on standard semiconductor processes. Examples
of
devices incorporating MEMS technology include airbag release systems, smart
pens
for digital signatures, the Sony AIBO™ entertainment robot and Texas
Instruments’ Digital Light Processing Cinema™ system.
Although
the practical application of tiny technology requires great expertise to
implement in manufacturing processes, we believe that tiny technology’s broad
applicability potentially presents significant and diverse market opportunities.
Our strategy is to invest in what we believe to be the best of these tiny
technology companies in which we have the opportunity to invest, with emphasis
on nanotechnology companies, assuming that we regard the terms of the investment
to be acceptable.
GENERAL
DESCRIPTION OF OUR PORTFOLIO COMPANIES
The
following are brief descriptions of each portfolio company in which we were
invested as of December 31, 2007. The portfolio companies are presented in
three
categories: companies where we directly or indirectly own more than 25 percent
of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company; companies
where
we directly or indirectly own five percent to 25 percent of the outstanding
voting securities of the portfolio company or where we hold one or more seats
on
the portfolio company’s Board of Directors and, therefore, are deemed to be an
affiliated person under the 1940 Act; and companies where we directly or
indirectly own less than five percent of the outstanding voting securities
of
the portfolio company and where we have no other affiliations. The value
described below for each portfolio company is its fair value as determined
by
the Valuation Committee of our Board of Directors. Each portfolio company
that
we believe is not significantly involved in tiny technology is designated
by an
asterisk (*).
Controlled
Affiliated Companies:
Evolved
Nanomaterial Sciences, Inc. (ENS),
was
located at 675 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, and
was
developing
a number of nanotechnology-enabled approaches for the resolution of chiral
molecules. As of December 31, 2007, we held 5,870,021 shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 52.10 percent of the total shares
of
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Outstanding) of ENS. On September 30,
2007,
ENS filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. As of the date above, our Valuation
Committee valued the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by us at $0.
Phoenix
Molecular, Inc.,
located
at 111 West 57th
Street,
New York, New York 10019, is developing a number of nanotechnology-enabled
approaches for the resolution of chiral molecules. As of December 31, 2007,
we
held 1,000 shares of Common Stock (representing 100 percent of the total
shares
of Common Stock outstanding) of Phoenix Molecular and $50,000 in Convertible
Bridge Notes (representing 100 percent of the total Convertible Bridge Notes
outstanding). As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued the total
amount of securities of Phoenix Molecular held by us at $50,743. Daniel B.
Wolfe
and Douglas W. Jamison serve as Directors of the company.
SiOnyx,
Inc.,
located
at 100 Cummings Center, Beverly, Massachusetts 01915, is developing
silicon-based optoelectronic products enabled by its proprietary material,
"Black Silicon." As of December 31, 2007, we held 233,499 shares of Series
A
Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 100 percent of the total shares
of
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding), 2,966,667 shares of Series
A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 42.38 percent of the total
shares
of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding), and 4,207,537 shares
of
Series A-2 Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 22.23 percent of the
total
shares of Series A-2 Convertible Preferred Stock) of SiOnyx. As
of the
date above, our Valuation Committee valued the total amount of shares of
SiOnyx
held by us at $4,304,616. The
Chief
Executive Officer of the company is Stephen D. Saylor. Charles E. Harris
serves
as a Director of the company, and Daniel B. Wolfe serves as an observer to
the
Board of Directors of the company.
30
Non-Controlled
Affiliated Companies:
Adesto
Technologies Corporation,
located
at 1225 Innsbruck Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94089, is a "fables" company
that
develops semiconductor products. As of December 31, 2007, we held 3,416,149
shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 18.37 percent
of
the total shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding) of
Adesto.
As of the above date, our Valuation Committee valued the total amount of
shares
of Adesto held by us at $1,147,826. The Chief Executive Officer of the company
is Narbeh Derhacobian. Michael A. Janse serves as a Director of the
company.
Ancora
Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
located at 200 Boston Avenue, Medford, Massachusetts 02155,
is
developing unique carbohydrate-based therapeutics
including immunomodulatory drugs such as vaccines and therapeutics to treat
cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Ancora also works with
pharmaceutical and industrial partners to provide customized
carbohydrate material. As
of
December
31,
2007,
we held 909,091 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
71.23 percent of the total shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) of Ancora, as well as warrants to purchase 754,717 shares of
Series
B Convertible Preferred Stock of the company at $1.06 per share.
As of
the above date, our Valuation Committee valued the total
amount of securities of
Ancora
held by us at $699,439. The Chief Executive Officer of the company is John
Pena.
Douglas
W. Jamison
serves
as a Director
of the
company.
BridgeLux,
Inc.,
located at 1170 Sonora Court, Sunnyvale, California 94086, is developing
high-power indium gallium nitride light emitting diodes that are used in
various
solid state lighting, mobile appliance, signage, and automotive applications.
As
of December 31, 2007, we held 1,861,504 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock (representing 11.70 percent of the total shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding) and
2,130,699 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 6.61
percent of the total shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding)
of
BridgeLux ,
as
well
as warrants to purchase 163,900 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock
of the company at $0.7136 per share.
As
of the
above date, our Valuation Committee valued of the total amount of securities
of
BridgeLux held by us at $6,219,995. The Chief Executive Officer of the company
is Mark Swoboda. Michael A. Janse serves as an observer to the Board of
Directors of the company.
Cambrios
Technology Corporation,
located
at 2450 Bayshore Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043,
is
developing methods of synthesizing nanomaterials and assembling them into
useful
structures for use in applications in electronics, solar energy and solid-state
lighting. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 1,294,025 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
10.78 percent of the total shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) and 1,300,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 6.66 percent of the total shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding) of Cambrios. As of the above date, our Valuation Committee
valued the total amount of shares of Cambrios held by us at $2,594,025. The
Chief Executive Officer of the company is Michael R. Knapp. Michael A. Janse
serves as an observer to the Board of Directors of the
company.
Chlorogen,
Inc.,
was
located at 893 North Warson Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63141, and was developing
a chloroplast transformation technology for the production of plant-based
proteins. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 4,478,038 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
13.57 percent of the total shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding), 2,077,930 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 18.21 percent of the total shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding) and $176,811 in Convertible Bridge Notes
(representing 14.76 percent of the total Convertible Bridge Notes outstanding)
of Chlorogen. On November 30, 2007, Chlorogen filed a Certificate of Dissolution
with the state of Delaware. As of the above date, our Valuation Committee
valued
the total amount of securities of Chlorogen held by us at $0.
31
Crystal
IS, Inc.,
located
at 70 Cohoes Avenue, Green Island, New York 12183, is developing methods
to
produce large, single-crystal substrates of aluminum nitride (AlN) for use
in
the gallium nitride semiconductor industry. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 391,571 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
5.66 percent of the total shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) and 1,300,376 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 9.51 percent of the total shares of Series A-1 Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding) of Crystal IS, as well as warrants to purchase
21,977 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock of the company at
$0.78
per share. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued the total
amount
of securities of Crystal IS held by us at $1,333,538. The Chief Executive
Officer of the company is Ding Day. Michael A. Janse serves as an observer
to
the Board of Directors of the company.
CSwitch,
Inc.,
located
at 3131 Jay Street, Santa Clara, California 95054, is developing the next
generation of low-power, efficient, and highly-integrated system-on-a-chip
(SOC)
solutions for a wide range of communications-based platforms. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 6,863,118 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
9.76 percent of the total shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) and $529,852 in Convertible Bridge Notes (representing 9.62
percent
of the total Convertible Bridge Notes outstanding) of CSwitch. As of the
date
above, our Valuation Committee valued the total amount of securities of CSwitch
held by us at $3,973,140. The Chief Executive Officer of the company is Doug
Laird. Alexei A. Andreev serves as a Director of the company.
D-Wave
Systems, Inc.,
located
at 100-4401 Still Creek Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6G9, Canada,
is
developing
high-performance quantum computing systems for commercial use in logistics,
bioinformatics, life and physical sciences, quantitative finance and electronic
design automation. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 2,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
13.55 percent of the total number of shares of Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding) of D-Wave. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee
valued the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of D-Wave Systems held by
us at
$2,226,488. The Chief Executive Officer of the company is Herb Martin. Alexei
A.
Andreev serves as a Director of the company. D-Wave Systems, Inc. is not
an
eligible portfolio company under the 1940 Act, because it operates primarily
outside the United States.
Ensemble
Discovery Corporation,
located
at 99 Erie Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, is developing classes
of drugs and bioassays based on its proprietary DNA-Programmed Chemistry™ (DPC™)
platform. Using DPC, Ensemble has built a product platform that will support
the
development of novel classes of therapeutics and bioassays for research and
diagnostics. As
of
December
31,
2007,
we held 1,449,275 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
13.33 percent of the total shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) of Ensemble. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued
the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock held by us at $2,000,000. The Chief
Executive Officer of the company is Michael D. Taylor. Daniel B. Wolfe serves
as
an observer to the Board of Directors of the company.
Innovalight,
Inc.,
located
at 965 East Arques, Sunnyvale, California 94085, is developing renewable
energy products based on silicon nanotechnology.
As of
December
31,
2007,
we held 16,666,666 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
33.33 percent of the total shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) and 5,810,577 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 7.12 percent of the total shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding) of Innovalight. Innovalight is focused on bringing ultra
low-cost solar power modules to the marketplace. The company uses a proprietary
silicon-ink process to print thin-film solar power modules. Leveraging the
advantages of solvent-based processing, Innovalight aims to accelerate the
promise of more affordable solar power solutions for residential and commercial
applications. The market for solar-energy solutions is estimated to be $15
billion and expected to grow to $36 billion by 2010. Innovalight is a
development company and has yet to generate significant revenues from the
commercial sale of products. The company’s main competition in this market
include companies such as First Solar, Inc., Konarka, Inc., Miasole, Inc.,
Nanosolar, Inc., and HelioVolt Corporation as these companies are also focused
on the commercialization of thin-film solar power modules. The
company
is highly dependent on its intellectual property position and its ability
to
protect this position. Revenue generated by the company may be affected
positively or negatively by government regulations that favor one form of
energy
generation over another. The Chief Executive Officer of the company is Conrad
Burke. The Chief Technical Officer and Vice President of Engineering is Homer
Antoniadis. The Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company is Alf
Bjørseth. As
of the
date above, our Valuation Committee valued the total amount of shares held
by us
at $7,711,784. Michael A. Janse serves as a Director of the
company.
32
Kereos,
Inc.,
located
at 4041 Forest Park Ave., Saint Louis, Missouri 63108, is developing molecular
imaging agents and targeted therapeutics for the detection and treatment
of
cancer and cardiovascular disease based on proprietary ligand-targeted emulsion
technologies. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 545,456 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
8.06 percent of the total shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) of Kereos. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued
the
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock held by us at $159,743. The Chief Executive
Officer of the company is Robert A. Beardsley. Daniel B. Wolfe serves as
an
observer to the Board of Directors of the company.
Kovio,
Inc.,
located
at 1145 Sonora Court, Sunnyvale, California 94086, is developing semiconductor
products using thin film technologies, printed electronics and nanoparticle
inks. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 2,500,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
20.21 percent of the total shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) and 800,000 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 4.40 percent of the total shares of Series D Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding) of Kovio. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee
valued the total amount of shares held by us at $4,125,000. The Chief Executive
Officer of the company is Amir Mashkoori. Alexei A. Andreev serves as an
observer to the Board of Directors of the company.
LifCo,
Inc.,
located
at 3943
Veselich Avenue, Los Angles, California 90039, is
developing primary
and rechargeable batteries enabled by nanotechnology. As
of
December
31,
2007,
we held 1,208,262 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
13.17 percent of the total shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) of LifCo. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued
the
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by us at $946,528. The acting
President is Rachid Yazami. On February 28, 2008, Lifco merged with CFX Battery,
Inc., to form CFX Battery, Inc. Alexei A. Andreev serves as an observer to
the
Board of Directors of the company.
Mersana
Therapeutics, Inc.,
located
at 840 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, is a pharmaceutical
company founded to develop advanced drug delivery systems based on proprietary
molecular constructs and "biological stealth" materials. As of
December
31,
2007,
we held 68,451 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
87.50 percent of the total shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) and 866,500 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 8.22 percent of the total shares of Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding) of Mersana, as well as warrants to purchase 91,625 shares
of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the company at a price of $2.00 per
share. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued the total
securities of Mersana held by us at $1,988,282. The Chief Executive
Officer of the company is Julie A. Olson. Charles E. Harris serves as a
Director of the company.
Metabolon,
Inc.,
located
at 800 Capitola Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27713, is using
a
proprietary technology platform in metabolomics to map changes in metabolic
pathways for the identification of biomarkers and the early diagnosis of
disease
states.
As of
December
31,
2007,
we held 2,173,913 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
31.25 percent of the total shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding)
of
Metabolon. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued the Series
B
Convertible Preferred Stock held by us at $2,500,000. The Chief Executive
Officer of the company is John Ryals. Douglas W. Jamison serves as an observer
to the Board of Directors of the company.
NanoGram
Corporation,
located
at 165 Topaz Street, Milpitas, California 95035, is developing a broad suite
of
intellectual property for use in fields including, nanomaterials-based films,
discovery of new nanomaterials compositions, and rapid synthesis of nanopowders
and films. As of December
31,
2007 we
held 63,210 shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
1.99
percent of the total shares of Series I Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding), 1,250,904 shares of Series II Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 12.47 percent of the total shares of Series II Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding) and 1,242,144 shares of Series III Convertible
Preferred Stock (representing 6.74 percent of the total shares of Series
III
Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding) 432,179
shares of Series IV Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 3.28 percent
of
the total shares of Series IV Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding)
of
NanoGram. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued the total
amount
of shares of NanoGram held by us at $5,887,222. The Chief Executive Officer
of
the company is Kieran F. Drain. Alexei A. Andreev serves as an observer to
the
Board of Directors of the company.
33
NanoOpto
Corporation,
was
located at 1600 Cottontail Lane, Somerset, New Jersey 08873, and was developing
and manufacturing discrete, integrated optical communications sub-components
on
a chip by utilizing nano-manufacturing technology. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 267,857 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
10.39 percent of the total shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding), 3,819,935 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 14.81 percent of the total shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding), 1,932,789 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock (representing 5.80 percent of the total Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding) and 1,397,218 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred
Stock
(representing 8.19 percent of the total Series shares of Series D Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding) of NanoOpto, as well as warrants to purchase
193,279 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the company at
a price
of $0.4359 per share and $268,654 in Convertible Bridge Notes of NanoOpto.
On
July 19, 2007, NanoOpto sold its assets to API Nanotronics, Inc. As of the
above
date, our Valuation Committee valued the total amount of securities of NanoOpto
held by us at $105,714.
Nextreme
Thermal Solutions, Inc.,
located
at 3908 Patriot Drive, Durham, North Carolina, 27703, is developing
next-generation thermoelectrics based on its unique, thin-film technology
for
applications that require high-performance solutions for thermal management
solutions. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 1,750,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
12.59 percent of the total shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) of Nextreme. As of the above date, our Valuation Committee valued
the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Nextreme held by us at $1,750,000.
The Chief Executive Officer of the company is Jesko von Windheim. Douglas
W.
Jamison serves as a Director of the Company.
Questech
Corporation,
located
at 92 Park Street, Rutland, Vermont 05701, manufactures and sells tile and
trim
products, based on its proprietary technology, with revenue generated from
stock
products. We originally invested in Questech on May 26, 1994. We did not
invest
in Questech as a tiny technology company, but Questech’s proprietary technology
is dependent on micro-scale processes. Thus, Questech may be regarded as
a tiny
technology holding. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 655,454 shares of Common Stock (representing 8.07 percent of the
total
shares of Common Stock outstanding) of Questech, as well as warrants to purchase
10,000 shares of Common Stock of the company at $1.50 per share. As of the
date
above, our Valuation Committee valued the Common Stock of Questech held by
us at
$592,254. The Chief Executive Officer of the company is Barry J.
Culkin.
Siluria
Technologies, Inc.,
located
at 2750 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, is developing
next-generation nanomaterials. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 482,218 shares of Series S-2 Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
10.72 percent of the total shares of Series S-2 Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) of Siluria. As of the above date, our Valuation Committee valued
the Series S-2 Convertible Preferred Stock of Siluria held by us at $160,723.
The General Manager of the company is Alex Tkachenko.
Michael
A. Janse serves as an observer to the Board of Directors of the
company.
34
Solazyme,
Inc.,
located
at 561 Eccles Avenues, South San Francisco, California 94080, is harnessing
the
power of the sun through the directed evolution of selected photosynthetic
microbes to provide efficient bioproduction solutions to the energy,
pharmaceutical, chemical and nutraceutical industries. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 988,204 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
12.76 percent of the total shares of outstanding of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock) and
495,246 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 5.77
percent of the total shares of outstanding of Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock) of
Solazyme. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued the total
amount
of shares of Solazyme held by us at $1,497,691. The Chief Executive Officer
of
the company is Jonathan S. Wolfson. Douglas W. Jamison serves as an observer
to
the Board of Directors of the company.
Xradia,
Inc.,
located
at 5052 Commercial Circle, Concord, California 94520, is developing and
manufacturing a suite of high-resolution x-ray microscopes and fluorescence
imaging systems for non-destructive imaging of embedded internal
structures.
As of
December 31, 2007, we held 3,121,099 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred
Stock (representing 57.14 percent of the total shares of Series D Convertible
Preferred Stock Outstanding) of Xradia. As of the date above, our Valuation
Committee fair valued the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock held by us
at
$4,000,000. The Chief Executive Officer of the company is Rod Browning. Alexei
A. Andreev serves as a Director of the company.
Zia
Laser, Inc.,
was
located at 801 University Boulevard SE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, and
was
developing quantum dot-based semiconductor laser technology for application
in
microprocessors. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 1,500,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Shares (representing
17.48 percent of the total shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Shares
outstanding) of Zia Laser. On November 30, 2006, the assets of Zia Laser
were
acquired by Innolume, Inc. As of the above date, our Valuation Committee
valued
the Series C Convertible Preferred Shares of Zia Laser held by us at $21,329.
Unaffiliated
Companies:
BioVex
Group, Inc.,
located
at 34 Commerce Way, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, is developing biological
treatments for cancer and the prevention of infectious disease. As of
December
31,
2007,
we held 2,799,552 shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
9.92 percent of the total shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) of BioVex. As of the above date, our Valuation Committee valued
the
Series E Convertible Preferred Stock of BioVex held by us at $2,500,000.
The
Chief Executive Officer of the company is Philip Astley-Sparke. Misti Ushio
serves as an observer to the Board of Directors of the
company.
*Exponential
Business Development Company,
located
at 460 Oakridge Common, South Salem, New York 10590, is a venture capital
partnership that invests in early stage manufacturing, software development
and
communication technology industries in the Albany area. As of December
31,
2007,
we held one Limited Partnership Unit (representing 0.87 percent of the total
Limited Partnership Units outstanding) of the company. As of the date above,
our
Valuation Committee valued the Limited Partnership Unit held by us at $2,026.
The manager of the portfolio of the company is Jeff Rubin, President of NewTek
Capital, Inc.
Molecular
Imprints, Inc.,
located
at 1807 West Braker Lane, Austin, Texas 78758, is developing lithography
systems
and technology for manufacturing applications in the areas of nanodevices,
microstructures, advanced packaging, bio devices, optical components and
semiconductor devices. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 1,333,333 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
6.55 percent of the total shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding)
and
1,250,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 14.75
percent of the total shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding)
of Molecular Imprints, as well as warrants to purchase 125,000 shares of
Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock of the company at a price of $2.00 per share.
As
of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued the total amount of securities
of Molecular Imprints held by us at $4,500,000. The Chief Executive Officer
of
the company is Mark Melliar-Smith. Alexei A. Andreev serves as an observer
to
the Board of Directors of the company.
35
Nanosys,
Inc.,
located
at 2625 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, California 94304, is a company with
broad-based intellectual property that is initially commercializing applications
in macroelectronics, memory, and fuel cells. These applications incorporate
zero
and one-dimensional, nanometer-scale materials, such as nanowires and nanodots
(quantum dots), as their principal active elements. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 803,428 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (representing
4.00 percent of the total shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding) and 1,016,950 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 6.28 percent of the total shares of Series D Preferred Stock
outstanding) of Nanosys. As of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued
the total amount of shares of Nanosys held by us at $5,370,116. The Chief
Executive Officer of the company is Calvin Chow.
Nantero,
Inc.,
located
at 25-E Olympia Avenue, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, is developing non-volatile
random access memory based on carbon nanotubes. As of December 31, 2007,
we held
345,070 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 8.17
percent of the total shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding), 207,051
shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 3.08 percent
of the
total shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding) and 188,315
shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (representing 3.75 percent
of the
total shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding) of Nantero.
As
of the date above, our Valuation Committee valued the total amount of shares
of
Nantero held by us at $2,246,409. The Chief Executive Officer of the company
is
Greg Schmergel.
NeoPhotonics
Corporation,
located
at 2911 Zanker Road, San Jose, California 95134, is developing functional
optical component arrays to offer integrated optical "systems on a chip"
to
component vendors. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 716,195 shares of Common Stock (representing 1.50 percent of the
total
shares of Common Stock outstanding), 1,831,256 shares of Series 1 Convertible
Preferred Stock (representing 4.05 percent of the total Series 1 Convertible
Preferred Stock), 741,898 shares of Series 2 Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 3.46 percent of the total shares of Series 2 Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding) and 2,750,000 shares of Series 3 Convertible Preferred
Stock
(representing 2.76 percent of the total shares of Series 3 Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding) of NeoPhotonics, as well as warrants to purchase 30,427
shares of Common Stock of the company at $0.15 per share. As of the date
above,
our Valuation Committee valued the total amount of securities of NeoPhotonics
held by us at $5,458,759. The Chief Executive Officer of the company is Timothy
S. Jenks. Alexei A. Andreev serves as an observer to the Board of Directors
of
the company.
Polatis,
Inc.,
located
at 5 Fortune Drive, Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, is developing a family
of
MEMS switches for optical network applications, based on Polatis’s proprietary
piezoelectric ceramic substrates. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 16,775 shares of the Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 6.17 percent of the total shares of Series A-1 Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding), 71,611 shares of Series A-2 Convertible Preferred
Stock (representing 4.65 percent of the total Series A-2 Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding), 4,774 shares of Series A-4 Convertible Preferred Stock
(representing 4.65 percent of the total shares of Series A-4 Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding) and 16,438 shares of Series A-5 Convertible
Preferred Stock (representing 1.79 percent of the total shares of Series
A-5
Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding) of Polatis. As of the date above,
our
Valuation Committee valued the total amount of shares of Polatis held by
us at
$276,526. The Chief Executive Officer of the company is David Lewis. Lori
D.
Pressman serves as an observer to the Board of Directors of the
company.
Starfire
Systems, Inc.,
located
at 10 Hermes Road, Malta, New York 12020, offers a family of patented silicon
carbide forming polymers for the manufacture of advanced ceramic materials
applications. As of December
31,
2007,
we held 375,000 shares of Common Stock (representing 4.59 percent of the
total
shares of Common Stock outstanding) and 600,000 shares of Series A-1 Convertible
Preferred Stock (representing 12.87 percent of the total shares of Series
A-1
Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding) of Starfire. As of the above date,
our
Valuation Committee valued the total
amount of shares of Starfire held by us at $750,000. The Chief Executive
Officer
of the company is Richard M. Saburro. Douglas W. Jamison serves as an observer
to the Board of Directors of the company.
36
Although
Ancora, BridgeLux, Crystal IS, Metabolon, Molecular Imprints, NanoGram, Nanomix,
Nanosys, NeoPhotonics, Nextreme, Polatis, Questech, Solazyme, Starfire Systems
and Xradia are all generating revenues ranging from nominal to significant
from
commercial sales of products and/or services, they are all still relatively
early-stage companies with the attendant risks. Additionally, with the
exceptions of BridgeLux, Exponential, Molecular Imprints, NeoPhotonics, Questech
and Xradia we consider all of the foregoing portfolio companies to be
development-stage companies. This term is used to describe a company that
devotes substantially all of its efforts to establishing a new business,
and
either has not yet commenced its planned principal operations, or it has
commenced such operations but has not realized significant revenue from them.
Any of the private companies may require additional funding that may not
be
obtainable at all or on the terms of their most recent fundings, which would
result in partial or complete write-downs in the value of our investment.
In
general, private equity is difficult to obtain, especially in the current
capital markets environment. Each company is dependent upon a single or small
number of customers and/or key operating personnel. All of the foregoing
companies rely heavily upon the technology associated with their respective
business or, in the case of Exponential, with the companies in which it invests.
Therefore, each company places great importance on its relevant patents,
trademarks, licenses, algorithms, trade secrets, franchises or concessions.
Lastly, each company is particularly vulnerable to general economic, private
equity and capital markets conditions and to changes in government regulation,
interest rates or technology.
As
a
participant in the venture capital business, we invest primarily in private
companies for which there is generally no publicly available information.
Because of the private nature of these businesses, there is a need to maintain
the confidentiality of the financial and other information that we have for
the
private companies in our portfolio. We believe that maintaining this confidence
is important, as disclosure of such information could disadvantage our portfolio
companies and could put us at a disadvantage in attracting new investments.
Therefore, we do not intend to disclose financial or other information about
our
portfolio companies, unless required, because we believe doing so may put them
at an economic or competitive disadvantage, regardless of our level of ownership
or control.
DETERMINATION
OF NET ASSET VALUE
Our
investments can be classified into five broad categories for valuation
purposes:
·
|
Equity-related
securities;
|
·
|
Investments
in intellectual property or patents or research and development in
technology or product development;
|
·
|
Long-term
fixed-income securities;
|
·
|
Short-term
fixed-income securities; and
|
·
|
All
other securities.
|
The
1940
Act requires periodic valuation of each investment in our portfolio to determine
net asset value. Under the 1940 Act, unrestricted securities with readily
available market quotations are to be valued at the current market value; all
other assets must be valued at "fair value" as determined in good faith by
or
under the direction of the Board of Directors.
Our
Board
of Directors is responsible for (1) determining overall valuation guidelines
and
(2) ensuring the valuation of investments within the prescribed
guidelines.
37
Our
Valuation Committee, comprised of three or more independent Board members,
is
responsible for reviewing and approving the valuation of our assets within
the
guidelines established by the Board of Directors.
Fair
value is generally defined as the amount that an investment could be sold
for in
an orderly disposition over a reasonable time. Generally, to increase
objectivity in valuing our assets, external measures of value, such as public
markets or third-party transactions, are utilized whenever possible. Valuation
is not based on long-term work-out value, nor immediate liquidation value,
nor
incremental value for potential changes that may take place in the future.
Effective for our fiscal year commencing on January 1, 2008, FAS 157 defines
fair value as the price at which an asset would be sold or a liability
transferred in its principal market (or more advantageous market) from the
perspective of the reporting entity.
The
values assigned to these investments are based on available information and
do
not necessarily represent amounts that might ultimately be realized, as these
amounts depend on future circumstances and cannot reasonably be determined
until
the individual investments are actually liquidated or become readily
marketable.
Our
valuation policy with respect to the five broad investment categories is as
follows:
Equity-Related
Securities
Equity-related
securities, including warrants, are valued using one or more of the following
basic methods of valuation:
Analytical
Method. The
analytical method is generally used to value an investment position when
there
is no established public market in the company’s securities. This valuation
method is inherently imprecise and ultimately the result of reconciling the
judgments of our Valuation Committee members, based on the data available
to
them. The resulting valuation, although stated as a precise number, is
necessarily within a range of values that vary depending upon the significance
attributed to the various factors being considered. Some of the factors
considered may include: the cost of our investment, transactions in a company’s
securities or unconditional firm offers by responsible parties as a factor
in
determining valuation, the financial condition and operating results of the
company, the long-term potential of the business and technology of the company,
the values of similar securities issued by companies in similar businesses,
the
proportion of the company’s securities we own and the nature of any rights to
require the company to register restricted securities under applicable
securities laws, and the rights and preferences of the class of securities
we
own as compared to other classes of securities the portfolio company has
issued.
When the analytical method is used to value warrants, the Company utilizes
the
Black-Scholes model.
Public
Market Method. The
public market method is used when there is an established public market for
the
class of the company’s securities held by us or into which our securities are
convertible. We discount market value for securities that are subject to
significant legal or contractual transfer restrictions. Securities, for which
market quotations are readily available and which are not subject to substantial
legal or contractual and transfer restrictions, are carried at market value
as
of the time of valuation. Market value for securities traded on securities
exchanges or on the Nasdaq Global Market is the last reported sales price
on the
day of valuation. For other securities traded in the over-the-counter market
and
listed securities for which no sale was reported on that day, market value
is
the mean of the closing bid price and asked price on that day. This method
is
the preferred method of valuation when there is an established public market
for
a company’s securities, as that market provides the most objective basis for
valuation. If for any reason, the Valuation Committee determines that market
quotations are not reliable, such securities shall be fair valued by the
Valuation Committee.
38
Investments
in Intellectual Property or Patents or Research and Development in Technology
or
Product Development
These
investments are carried at fair value using the following basic method of
valuation:
Analytical
Method. The
analytical method is used to value investments in intellectual property or
patents or research and development in technology or product development.
This
valuation method is inherently imprecise and ultimately the result of
reconciling the judgments of our Valuation Committee members. The resulting
valuation, although stated as a precise number, is necessarily within a range
of
values that vary depending upon the significance attributed to the various
factors being considered. Some of the factors considered may include: the
cost
of the investment; investments in the same or substantially similar intellectual
property or patents or research and development in technology or product
development or offers by responsible third parties; the results of research
and
development; product development progress; commercial prospects; term of
patent;
projected markets; and other substantive factors.
As
of
March 31, 2008, we did not have any investments in intellectual property
or
patents or research and development in technologies or
products.
Long-Term
Fixed-Income Securities
Fixed-income
securities for which market quotations are readily available are carried at
market value as of the time of valuation using the most recent bid quotations
when available. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available
are carried at fair value using one or more of the following basic methods
of
valuation:
·
|
Fixed-income
securities are valued by independent pricing services that provide
market
quotations based primarily on quotations from dealers and brokers,
market
transactions, and other sources.
|
·
|
Other
fixed-income securities that are not readily marketable are valued
at fair
value by our Valuation Committee.
|
Short-Term
Fixed-Income Securities
Short-term
fixed-income securities are valued in the same manner as long-term fixed-income
securities until the remaining maturity of 60 days or less, after which time
such securities may be valued at amortized cost if there is no concern over
payment at maturity.
All
Other Securities
All
other
securities are reported at fair value as determined in good faith by the
Valuation Committee. As of March 31, 2008, we did not have any of these
investments.
The
reported values of securities for which market quotations are not readily
available and for other assets reflect the Valuation Committee’s judgment of
fair values as of the valuation date using the outlined basic methods of
valuation. They do not necessarily represent an amount of money that would
be
realized if we had to sell the securities in an immediate liquidation. Thus,
valuations as of any particular date are not necessarily indicative of amounts
that we may ultimately realize as a result of future sales or other dispositions
of investments we hold.
Determinations
of Net Asset Value in Connection with Offerings
In
connection with each offering of our Common Stock, our Board of Directors or
a
committee thereof is required to make the determination that we are not selling
our Common Stock at a price below the
then
current net asset value of our Common Stock at the time at which the sale is
made. Our Board of Directors considers the following factors, among others,
in
making such determination:
39
|
•
|
|
the
net asset value of our Common Stock disclosed in the most recent
periodic
report we filed with the SEC;
|
|
•
|
|
our
Management’s assessment of whether any material change in the net asset
value of our Common Stock has occurred (including through the realization
of gains on the sale of our portfolio securities) from the period
beginning on the date of the most recently disclosed net asset value
of
our Common Stock to the period ending two days prior to the date
of the
sale of our Common Stock; and
|
|
•
|
|
the
magnitude of the difference between the net asset value of our Common
Stock disclosed in the most recent periodic report we filed with
the SEC
and our Management’s assessment of any material change in the net asset
value of our Common Stock since the date of the most recently disclosed
net asset value of our Common Stock, and the offering price of our
Common
Stock in the proposed offering.
|
Moreover,
to the extent that there is even a remote possibility that we may (i) issue
our Common Stock at a price below the then current net asset value of our
Common
Stock at the time at which the sale is made or (ii) trigger the undertaking
(which we provided to the SEC in our registration statements) to suspend
the
offering of our Common stock if the net asset value of our Common Stock
fluctuates by certain amounts in certain circumstances until the prospectus
is
amended, the Board of Directors will elect, in the case of clause
(i) above, either to postpone the offering until such time that there is no
longer the possibility of the occurrence of such event or to undertake to
determine the net asset value of our Common Stock within two days prior to
any
such sale to ensure that such sale will not be below our then current net
asset
value, and, in the case of clause (ii) above, to comply with such
undertaking or to undertake to determine the net asset value of our Common
Stock
to ensure that such undertaking has not been triggered.
INVESTMENT
POLICIES
Investments
and Strategies
The
following is a summary description of the types of assets in which we may
invest, the investment strategies we may utilize and the attendant risks
associated with our investments and strategies. For a full description of our
investments and strategies, please refer to our Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Equity,
Equity-Related Securities and Debt with Equity Features
We
may
invest in equity, equity-related securities and debt with equity features.
These
securities include common stock, preferred stock, debt instruments convertible
into common or preferred stock, limited partnership interests, other beneficial
ownership interests and warrants, options or other rights to acquire any of
the
foregoing.
We
may
make investments in companies with operating histories that are unprofitable
or
marginally profitable, that have negative net worth or that are involved in
bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings. These investments would involve
businesses that management believes have turn around potential through the
infusion of additional capital and management assistance. In addition, we may
make investments in connection with the acquisition or divestiture of companies
or divisions of companies. There is a significantly greater risk of loss with
these types of securities than is the case with traditional investment
securities.
We
may
also invest in publicly traded securities of whatever nature, including
relatively small, emerging growth companies that management believes have
long-term growth possibilities. Pursuant to a rule adopted by the SEC, our
investments in U.S. non-financial public companies whose securities are not
listed on a securities exchange will generally be treated as qualifying assets
for purposes of maintaining our business
development company status if we acquire such investments in private placements
or secondary market transactions.
40
Warrants,
options and convertible or exchangeable securities generally give the investor
the right to acquire specified equity securities of an issuer at a specified
price during a specified period or on a specified date. Warrants and options
fluctuate in value in relation to the value of the underlying security and
the
remaining life of the warrant or option, while convertible or exchangeable
securities fluctuate in value both in relation to the intrinsic value of the
security without the conversion or exchange feature and in relation to the
value
of the conversion or exchange feature, which is like a warrant or option. When
we invest in these securities, we incur the risk that the option feature will
expire worthless, thereby either eliminating or diminishing the value of our
investment.
Our
investments in equity securities usually involve securities of private companies
that are restricted as to sale and cannot be sold in the open market without
registration under the Securities Act of 1933 or pursuant to a specific
exemption from these registrations. Opportunities for sale are more limited
than
in the case of marketable securities, although these investments may be
purchased at more advantageous prices and may offer attractive investment
opportunities. Even if one of our portfolio companies completes an initial
public offering, we are typically subject to a lock-up agreement, and the stock
price may decline substantially before we are free to sell. Even if we have
registration rights to make our investments more marketable, a considerable
amount of time may elapse between a decision to sell or register the securities
for sale and the time when we are able to sell the securities. The prices
obtainable upon sale may be adversely affected by market conditions or negative
conditions affecting the issuer during the intervening time.
Venture
Capital Investments
We
expect
to invest in development stage or start-up businesses. Substantially all of
our
long-term investments are in thinly capitalized, unproven, small companies
focused on risky technologies. These businesses also tend to lack management
depth, to have limited or no history of operations and to have not attained
profitability. Because of the speculative nature of these investments, these
securities have a significantly greater risk of loss than traditional investment
securities. Some of our venture capital investments are likely to be complete
losses or unprofitable and some will never realize their potential.
We
may
own 100 percent of the securities of a start-up investment for a period of
time
and may control the company for a substantial period. Start-up companies are
more vulnerable than better capitalized companies to adverse business or
economic developments. Start-up businesses generally have limited product lines,
service niches, markets and/or financial resources. Start-up companies are
not
well-known to the investing public and are subject to potential bankruptcy,
general movements in markets and perceptions of potential growth.
In
connection with our venture capital investments, we may participate in providing
a variety of services to our portfolio companies, including the following:
·
|
recruiting
management;
|
·
|
formulating
operating strategies;
|
·
|
formulating
intellectual property strategies;
|
·
|
assisting
in financial planning;
|
·
|
providing
management in the initial start-up stages; and
|
·
|
establishing
corporate goals.
|
41
We
may
assist in raising additional capital for these companies from other potential
investors and may subordinate our own investment to that of other investors.
We
may also find it necessary or appropriate to provide additional capital of
our
own. We may introduce these companies to potential joint venture partners,
suppliers and customers. In addition, we may assist in establishing
relationships with investment bankers and other professionals. We may also
assist with mergers and acquisitions. We do not derive income from these
companies for the performance of any of the above services.
We
may
control, be represented on or have observer rights on the Board of Directors
of
a portfolio company by one or more of our officers or directors, who may also
serve as officers of the portfolio company. We indemnify our officers and
directors for serving on the Boards of Directors or as officers of portfolio
companies, which exposes us to additional risks. Particularly during the early
stages of an investment, we may in effect be involved in the conduct of the
operations of the portfolio company. As a venture company emerges from the
developmental stage with greater management depth and experience, we expect
that
our role in the portfolio company’s operations will diminish. Our goal is to
assist each company in establishing its own independent capitalization,
management and Board of Directors. We expect to be able to reduce our interest
in those start-up companies which become successful.
Debt
Obligations
We
may
hold debt securities for income and as a reserve pending more speculative
investments. Debt obligations may include U.S. government and agency securities,
commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, receivables or other asset-based
financing, notes, bonds, debentures, or other debt obligations of any nature
and
repurchase agreements related to these securities. These obligations may
have
varying terms with respect to security or credit support, subordination,
purchase price, interest payments and maturity from private, public or
governmental issuers of any type located anywhere in the world. We may invest
in
debt obligations of companies with operating histories that are unprofitable
or
marginally profitable, that have negative net worth or are involved in
bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings, or that are start-up or development
stage entities. In addition, we may participate in the acquisition or
divestiture of companies or divisions of companies through issuance or receipt
of debt obligations. As of March 31, 2008, the debt obligations held in our
portfolio consisted of convertible bridge notes and U.S. Treasury
securities.
It
is
likely that our investments in debt obligations will be of varying quality,
including non-rated, unsecured, highly speculative debt investments with
limited
marketability. Investments in lower-rated and non-rated securities, commonly
referred to as "junk bonds," are subject to special risks, including a greater
risk of loss of principal and non-payment of interest. Generally, lower-rated
securities offer a higher return potential than higher-rated securities but
involve greater volatility of price and greater risk of loss of income and
principal, including the possibility of default or bankruptcy of the issuers
of
these securities. Lower-rated securities and comparable non-rated securities
will likely have large uncertainties or major risk exposure to adverse
conditions and are predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s
capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms
of the
obligation. The occurrence of adverse conditions and uncertainties to issuers
of
lower-rated securities would likely reduce the value of lower-rated securities
held by us, with a commensurate effect on the value of our
shares.
The
markets in which lower-rated securities or comparable non-rated securities
are
traded generally are more limited than those in which higher-rated securities
are traded. The existence of limited markets for these securities may restrict
our ability to obtain accurate market quotations for the purposes of valuing
lower-rated or non-rated securities and calculating net asset value or to sell
securities at their fair value. Any economic downturn could adversely affect
the
ability of issuers’ lower-rated securities to repay principal and pay interest
thereon. The market values of lower-rated and non-rated securities also tend
to
be more sensitive to individual corporate developments and changes in economic
conditions than higher-rated securities. In addition, lower-rated securities
and
comparable non-rated securities generally present a higher degree of credit
risk. Issuers of lower-rated securities and comparable non-rated securities
are
often highly leveraged and may not have more traditional methods of financing
available to them, so that their ability to service their debt obligations
during an economic downturn or during sustained periods of rising interest
rates may be impaired. The risk of loss owing to default by these issuers is
significantly greater because lower-rated securities and comparable non-rated
securities generally are unsecured and frequently are subordinated to the prior
payment of senior indebtedness. We may incur additional expenses to the extent
that we are required to seek recovery upon a default in the payment of principal
or interest on our portfolio holdings.
42
The
market value of investments in debt securities that carry no equity
participation usually reflects yields generally available on securities of
similar quality and type at the time purchased. When interest rates decline,
the
market value of a debt portfolio already invested at higher yields can be
expected to rise if the securities are protected against early call. Similarly,
when interest rates increase, the market value of a debt portfolio already
invested at lower yields can be expected to decline. Deterioration in credit
quality also generally causes a decline in market value of the security,
while
an improvement in credit quality generally leads to increased
value.
Foreign
Securities
We
may
make investments in securities of issuers whose principal operations are
conducted outside the United States, and whose earnings and securities are
stated in foreign currency. In order to maintain our status as a business
development company, our investments in the stocks of companies organized
outside the U.S. would be limited to 30 percent of our assets, because we must
invest at least 70 percent of our assets in "qualifying assets" and securities
of foreign companies are not "qualifying assets."
Compared
to otherwise comparable investments in securities of U.S. issuers, currency
exchange risk of securities of foreign issuers is a significant variable. The
value of these investments to us will vary with the relation of the currency
in
which they are denominated to the U.S. dollar, as well as with intrinsic
elements of value such as credit risk, interest rates and performance of the
issuer. Investments in foreign securities also involve risks relating to
economic and political developments, including nationalization, expropriation,
currency exchange freezes and local recession. Securities of many foreign
issuers are less liquid and more volatile than those of comparable U.S. issuers.
Interest and dividend income and capital gains on our foreign securities may
be
subject to withholding and other taxes that may not be recoverable by us. We
may
seek to hedge all or part of the currency risk of our investments in foreign
securities through the use of futures, options and forward currency purchases
or
sales.
Intellectual
Property
We
believe there is a role for organizations that can assist in technology
transfer. Scientists and institutions that develop and patent intellectual
property perceive the need for and rewards of entrepreneurial commercialization
of their inventions.
Our
form
of investment may be:
·
|
funding
research and development in the development of a technology;
|
·
|
obtaining
licensing rights to intellectual property or patents;
|
·
|
acquiring
intellectual property or patents;
or
|
·
|
forming
and funding companies or joint ventures to further commercialize
intellectual property.
|
Income
from our investments in intellectual property or its development may take the
form of participation in licensing or royalty income, fee income, or some other
form of remuneration. Investment in developmental intellectual property rights
involves a high degree of risk that can result in the loss of our entire
investment as well as additional risks including uncertainties as to the
valuation of an investment and potential difficulty in liquidating an
investment. Further, investments in intellectual property generally require
investor patience as investment return may be realized only after or over a
long
period. At some point during the commercialization of a technology, our
investment may be transformed into ownership of securities of a development
stage or start-up company as discussed under "Venture Capital Investments"
above.
43
Other
Strategies
In
pursuit of our investment strategy, we may employ one or more of the following
strategies in order to enhance investment results.
Borrowing
and Margin Transactions
We
may
from time to time borrow money or obtain credit by any lawful means from banks,
lending institutions, other entities or individuals, in negotiated transactions.
We may issue, publicly or privately, bonds, debentures or notes, in series
or
otherwise, with interest rates and other terms and provisions, including
conversion rights, on a secured or unsecured basis, for any purpose, up to
the
maximum amounts and percentages permitted for closed-end investment companies
under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act currently prohibits us from borrowing any
money
or issuing any other senior securities (other than preferred stock and other
than temporary borrowings of up to five percent of our assets), if in giving
effect to the borrowing or issuance, the value of our total assets would be
less
than 200 percent of our total liabilities (other than liabilities not
constituting senior securities). We may pledge assets to secure any borrowings.
We currently have no leverage and have no current intention to issue preferred
stock.
A
primary
purpose of our borrowing power is for leverage, to increase our ability to
acquire investments both by acquiring larger positions and by acquiring more
positions. Borrowings for leverage accentuate any increase or decrease in the
market value of our investments and thus our net asset value. Since any decline
in the net asset value of our investments will be borne first by holders of
Common Stock, the effect of leverage in a declining market would be a greater
decrease in net asset value applicable to the Common Stock than if we were
not
leveraged. Any decrease would likely be reflected in a decline in the market
price of the Common Stock. To the extent the income derived from assets acquired
with borrowed funds exceeds the interest and other expenses associated with
borrowing, our total income will be greater than if borrowings were not used.
Conversely, if the income from assets is not sufficient to cover the borrowing
costs, our total income will be less than if borrowings were not used. If our
current income is not sufficient to meet our borrowing costs (repayment of
principal and interest), we might have to liquidate our investments when it
may
be disadvantageous to do so. Our borrowings for the purpose of buying most
liquid equity securities will be subject to the margin rules, which require
excess liquid collateral marked to market daily. If we are unable to post
sufficient collateral, we would be required to sell securities to remain in
compliance with the margin rules. These sales might be at disadvantageous times
or prices.
Repurchase
of Shares
Our
shareholders do not have the right to compel us to redeem our shares. We may,
however, purchase outstanding shares of our Common Stock from time to time,
subject to approval of our Board of Directors and compliance with applicable
corporate and securities laws. The Board of Directors may authorize purchases
from time to time when they are deemed to be in the best interests of our
shareholders, but could do so only after notification to shareholders. The
Board
of Directors may or may not decide to undertake any purchases of our Common
Stock.
Our
repurchases of our common shares would decrease our total assets and would
therefore likely have the effect of increasing our expense ratio. Subject
to our
investment restrictions, we may borrow money to finance the repurchase of
our
Common Stock in the open market pursuant to any tender offer. Interest on
any
borrowings to finance share repurchase transactions will reduce our net assets.
If, because of market fluctuations or other reasons, the value of our assets
falls below the required 1940 Act coverage requirements, we may have to reduce
our borrowed debt to the extent necessary to comply with the requirement.
To
achieve a reduction, it is possible that we may be required to sell portfolio
securities at inopportune times when it may be disadvantageous to do so.
Since
1998, we have repurchased a total of 1,828,740
shares of our Common Stock at a total cost of $3,405,531, or $1.86 per share.
On
July 23, 2002, because of our strategic decision to invest in tiny technology,
our Board of Directors reaffirmed its commitment not to authorize the repurchase
of additional shares of our Common Stock.
44
Portfolio
Company Turnover
Changes
with respect to portfolio companies will be made as our management considers
necessary in seeking to achieve our investment objective. The rate of portfolio
turnover will not be treated as a limiting or relevant factor when circumstances
exist which are considered by management to make portfolio changes
advisable.
Although
we expect that many of our investments will be relatively long term in nature,
we may make changes in our particular portfolio holdings whenever it is
considered that an investment no longer has substantial growth potential
or has
reached its anticipated level of performance, or (especially when cash is
not
otherwise available) that another investment appears to have a relatively
greater opportunity for capital appreciation. We may also make general portfolio
changes to increase our cash to position us in a defensive posture. We may
make
portfolio changes without regard to the length of time we have held an
investment, or whether a sale results in profit or loss, or whether a purchase
results in the reacquisition of an investment which we may have only recently
sold. Our investments in privately held companies are illiquid, which limits
portfolio turnover.
The
portfolio turnover rate may vary greatly from year to year as well as during
a
year and may also be affected by cash requirements.
MANAGEMENT
OF THE COMPANY
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set
forth
below are the names, ages, positions and principal occupations during the past
five years of our directors and executive officers. We have no advisory board.
Our business address and that of our officers and directors is 111 West
57th
Street,
Suite 1100, New York, New York 10019.
Executive
Officers
Messrs.
Harris, Jamison, Wolfe, Andreev and Janse are Managing Directors and are
primarily responsible for the day to day management of our portfolio. They
have
served in this capacity since 1984, 2002, 2008, 2005 and 2007, respectively.
Charles
E. Harris. Mr.
Harris, 65, currently serves as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
as a
Managing Director. He has served as our Chief Executive Officer since July
1984
and as a Managing Director since January 2004. He has been a member of our
Board
of Directors and served as Chairman of the Board since April 1984. He also
served as our Chief Compliance Officer from February 1997 to February 2001.
He
is Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Harris
&
Harris Enterprises, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. His wife serves
as
our Corporate Secretary. He is a director of Mersana Therapeutics, Inc.,
and of
SiOnyx, Inc., privately held nanotechnology-enabled companies in which we
have
investments. He was a member of the Advisory Panel for the Congressional
Office
of Technology Assessment. Prior to joining us, he was Chairman of Wood,
Struthers and Winthrop Management Corporation, the investment advisory
subsidiary of Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette. He is currently a member of
the
New York Society of Security Analysts. He was, until 2004, a Trustee and
head of
the Audit Committee of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a not-for-profit
institution that conducts research and education programs in the biological
sciences, and he is currently a member of its President’s Council. He also
serves as a Trustee and head of the Audit Committee of the Nidus Center,
a
not-for-profit, life sciences, business incubator in St. Louis, Missouri.
He is
a life-sustaining fellow of MIT and a shareholder of its Entrepreneurship
Center. He is an "interested person" as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the
1940
Act, as a beneficial owner of more than five percent of our
Common Stock, as a control person and as one of our officers. He was graduated
from Princeton University (A.B.) and from the Columbia University Graduate
School of Business (M.B.A.).
45
Douglas
W. Jamison.
Mr.
Jamison, 38, has served as President and as Chief Operating Officer since
January 1, 2005, as Treasurer since March 2005, as a Managing Director
since January 2004, as Chief Financial Officer from January 2005 through
December 2007 and as Vice President from September 2002 through December
2004.
He has been a member of our Board of Directors since May 2007. Since January
2005, he has been President and a Director of Harris & Harris
Enterprises, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Harris & Harris Group,
Inc. Upon Mr. Harris's retirement, scheduled for December 31, 2008, the Board
of
Directors has named Mr. Jamison to succeed Mr. Harris in Mr. Harris's positions
as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Jamison is a director of Ancora
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of Nextreme Thermal Solutions, Inc., and of Phoenix
Molecular Corporation, privately held nanotechnology-enabled companies in
which
we have investments. He is Co-Editor-in-Chief of "Nanotechnology Law &
Business." He is Co-Chair of the Advisory Board, Converging Technology Bar
Association, a member of the University of Pennsylvania Nano-Bio Interface
Ethics Advisory Board and a member of the Advisory Board, Massachusetts
Technology Collaborative Nanotechnology Venture Forum. His professional
societies include the Association of University Technology Managers. From
1997
to 2002, he worked as a senior technology manager at the University of Utah
Technology Transfer Office, where he managed intellectual property in physics,
chemistry and the engineering sciences. He was graduated from Dartmouth College
(B.A.) and the University of Utah (M.S.).
Daniel
B. Wolfe.
Mr.
Wolfe, 31, has served as Chief Financial Officer and as a Managing Director
since January 2008, as Principal from January 2007 to January 2008, as Senior
Associate from January 2006 to January 2007, and as Vice President from July
2004 to January 2008. He is a director of Phoenix Molecular Corporation,
a
privately held nanotechnology-enabled company in which we have an investment.
Prior to joining us, he served as a consultant to Nanosys, Inc. (from 2002
to
2004), to CW Group (from 2001 to 2004) and to Bioscale, Inc. (from January
2004
to June 2004). From February 2000 to January 2002, he was the Co-founder
and
President of Scientific Venture Assessments, Inc., a provider of scientific
analysis of prospective investments for venture capital placements and of
scientific expertise to high-technology companies. He was graduated from
Rice
University (B.A., Chemistry), where his honors included the Zevi and Bertha
Salsburg Memorial Award in Chemistry and the Presidential Honor Roll, and
from
Harvard University (A.M., Ph.D., Chemistry), where he was an NSF Predoctoral
Fellow.
At
our
request, Mr. Wolfe was interim Chief Executive Officer of Evolved Nanomaterial
Sciences, Inc. ("ENS"), one of our portfolio companies, from July 1, 2007
to
September 28, 2007. ENS filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on September 30,
2007.
Alexei
A. Andreev.
Mr.
Andreev, 35, has served as an Executive Vice President and as a Managing
Director since March 2005. From 2002 to March 2005, he was an Associate with
Draper Fisher Jurvetson, a venture capital firm. In 2001, he was a Summer
Associate with TLcom Capital Partners, a London-based venture capital fund
backed by Morgan Stanley. From 1997 to 2000, he was an Associate at Renaissance
Capital Group/Sputnik Funds, a venture capital fund in Moscow, Russia.
Previously, he was a researcher at the Centre of Nanotechnology, Isan, in
Troitsk, Russia. He is a director of CSwitch, Inc., of D-Wave Systems, Inc.,
and
of Xradia, Inc., privately-held nanotechnology-enabled companies in which
we
have investments. He is a director of the American Business Association of
Russian Expatriates. He was graduated with a B.S. with honors in
Engineering/Material Sciences, with a Ph.D. in Solid State Physics from Moscow
Steel and Alloys Institute and with an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate
School
of Business.
Michael
A. Janse.
Mr.
Janse, 39, has served as an Executive Vice President and as a Managing Director
since April 2007. From January 2007 to April 2007 he was a Principal with
ARCH
Venture Partners and was an Associate from June 2002 to January 2007, following
earlier roles as an intern and then consultant. He concentrated on
investment opportunities in advanced semiconductor products, nanotechnology,
and
novel materials. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Janse worked in Motorola's Semiconductor
Products Sector (now Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.) as a process engineer,
and
later marketed semiconductor components to manufacturers of personal computers
and networking products. He is a director
of Adesto Technologies Corp., of Innovalight, Inc., and of Nanomix, Inc.,
privately-held nanotechnology-enabled companies in which we have investments.
He
was graduated from Brigham Young University (B.S., Chemical Engineering)
and The
University of Chicago (M.B.A.).
46
Sandra
Matrick Forman, Esq.
Ms.
Forman, 42, has served as General Counsel, as Chief Compliance Officer and
as
Director of Human Resources since August 2004. From 2001 to 2004, she was
an
Associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, in the
Investment Management Group. From May to August 2000, she was a summer associate
with Latham & Watkins LLP in its London office. From August to December
2000, she served as an intern in the office of the General Counsel, United
States Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense. From June
to
August 1999, she served as an intern for the Honorable Ronald S. Lew, United
States Federal District Court, Central District of California. She was graduated
from New York University (B.A.), where her honors included National Journalism
Honor Society, and from the University of California Los Angeles (J.D.),
where
her honors included Order of the Coif and membership on the Law Review. She
is
currently a member of the working group for the National Venture Capital
Association model documents.
Misti
Ushio.
Ms.
Ushio, 36, has served as a Vice President and Associate since May 2007. From
June 2006 to May 2007, Ms. Ushio was a Technology Licensing Officer at Columbia
University. From May 1996 to May 2006, she was employed by Merck & Co.,
Inc., most recently as a Senior Research Biochemical Engineer with the
Bioprocess R&D group. She was graduated from Johns Hopkins University (B.S.,
Chemical Engineering), Lehigh University (M.S., Chemical Engineering) and
University College London (Ph.D., Biochemical Engineering).
Patricia
N. Egan.
Ms.
Egan, 33, has served as Chief Accounting Officer, as Vice President and as
Senior Controller since June 2005. From June 2005 to December 2005 and since
August 2006, she served as an Assistant Secretary. She also serves as Chief
Accounting Officer, as Treasurer and as Secretary of Harris & Harris
Enterprises, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. From 1996 to
2005,
she served as a Manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in its financial services
group. She was graduated from Georgetown University (B.S., Accounting), where
her honors included the Othmar F. Winkler Award for Excellence in Community
Service. She is a Certified Public Accountant.
Mary
P. Brady. Ms.
Brady, 46, has served as a Vice President, as Controller and as an Assistant
Secretary since November 2005. From 2003 through 2005, she served as a senior
accountant at Clarendon Insurance Company in its program accounting group.
She
served from 2000 to 2003 as a senior associate at PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP in
its financial services group. She was graduated Summa Cum Laude from Lehman
College (B.S., Accounting). She is a Certified Public Accountant.
Jennifer
M. McGovern.
Ms.
McGovern, 30, has served as an Assistant Vice President, Counsel and an
Assistant Secretary from August 2007. From June 2006 to August 2006, she
worked
as a law clerk at Luskin, Stern & Eisler LLP. From January 2006 to April
2006, she was an intern in the Office of the General Counsel, New York Stock
Exchange. From July 1999 to June 2004, she worked at BlackRock, Inc., first
as
an Analyst, and then as an Associate, in the Private Client Group. She was
graduated from Columbia University (B.A., Art History, Economics), and from
Brooklyn Law School (J.D.), cum laude, where she was the Managing Editor
of the
Brooklyn
Journal of International Law
and a
member of the Moot Court Honor Society.
Susan
T. Harris.
Ms.
Harris, 63, has served as our Secretary since July 2001. From July 1999 to
July
2003, she was employed by Harris & Harris Enterprises, Inc., our wholly
owned subsidiary, working primarily in financial public relations. From July
2001 to July 2003, she served as Secretary and Treasurer of Harris & Harris
Enterprises, Inc. Since 1972, she has been an investor relations consultant,
operating as a sole proprietor prior to 1999, and again from July 2003 to
the
present. She was graduated from Wellesley College (B.A., Economics). Ms.
Harris’s husband serves as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and as a
Managing Director of the Company.
47
Board
of Directors
Our
Board
of Directors supervises our management. The responsibilities of each director
include, among other things, the oversight of the investment approval process,
the quarterly valuation of our assets, and the oversight of our financing
arrangements.
Interested
Directors:
Charles
E. Harris. See
biography under "Executive Officers."
Douglas
W. Jamison. See
biography under “Executive Officers.”
Kelly
S. Kirkpatrick, Ph.D.
Dr.
Kirkpatrick, 41, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since March
2002. She will not stand for re-election at the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. She has served as a consultant to us on nanotechnology and
in our
due diligence work on certain prospective investments. She is an independent
business consultant. From 2000 to 2002, she served in the Office of the
Executive Vice Provost of Columbia University, as Director of the Columbia
University Nanotechnology Initiative and as Director for Research and Technology
Initiatives. From 1998 to 2000, she served in the White House Office of Science
and Technology Policy, as a Senior Policy Analyst involved in the National
Nanotechnology Initiative. From 1997 to 1998, she was a Science Policy
Coordinator for Sandia National Laboratories. From 1995 to 1996, she served
in
the office of Senator Joseph Lieberman as Legislative Assistant, Congressional
Science and Engineering Fellow. She was graduated from University of Richmond
(B.S., Chemistry with a business option) and Northwestern University (Ph.D.,
Materials Science and Engineering). She may be considered to be an "interested
person" of the Company because of the consulting work she does for
us.
Lori
D. Pressman. Ms.
Pressman, 50, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since March
2002.
She has served as a consultant to us on tiny technology, intellectual property
and in our due diligence work on certain prospective investments. She also
acts
as an observer for us at Board meetings of certain portfolio companies in
the
Boston area. She is a business consultant providing advisory services to
start-ups and venture capital companies , including certain of our portfolio
companies. She consults internationally on technology transfer practices
and
metrics for non-profit and government organizations. From 1999 to 2001, she
was
Chair of the Survey Statistics and Metrics Committee of the Association of
University Technology Managers. From September 1989 to July 2000, she was
employed by MIT in its Technology Licensing Office; she served as a Technology
Licensing Officer from 1989 to 1995 and as Assistant Director of the Technology
Licensing Office from 1996 to 2000. She was graduated from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (S.B., Physics) and the Columbia School of Engineering
(MSEE). She may be considered to be an "interested person" of the Company
because of the consulting work she does for us.
Independent
Directors:
W.
Dillaway Ayres, Jr. Mr.
Ayres, 57, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since November
2006.
He has served as the Chief Operating Officer of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,
a
research and educational institution in the biological sciences, since November
of 2000. Prior to joining Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in 1998, Mr. Ayres
had a
20-year business career during which he worked as a corporate executive,
investment banker and entrepreneur. In 1996, he co-founded Business & Trade
Network, Inc., a business-to-business, venture capital-backed Internet company.
Prior to that he worked for five years as a Managing Director of Veronis,
Suhler
& Associates, a boutique investment banking firm in New York specializing in
the media/ communications industry. At Veronis, Suhler, he focused on investing
the firm’s private equity fund. He was graduated from Princeton University
(A.B., English) and from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business
(M.B.A., Finance).
Dr.
C. Wayne Bardin. Dr.
Bardin, 73, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since December
1994. Since 1996, he has served as the President of Bardin LLC, a consulting
firm to pharmaceutical companies. From 1998 to 2003, he served as President
of
Thyreos Corp., a privately held, start-up
pharmaceutical company. From 1978 through 1996, he was Vice President of
The
Population Council. His professional appointments have included: Professor
of
Medicine, Chief of the Division of Endocrinology, The Milton S. Hershey Medical
Center of Pennsylvania State University and Senior Investigator, Endocrinology
Branch, National Cancer Institute. He has also served as a consultant to
several
pharmaceutical companies. He has been appointed to the editorial boards of
15
journals. He has also served on national and international committees and
boards
for the National Institutes of Health, World Health Organization, The Ford
Foundation and numerous scientific societies. He was graduated from Rice
University (B.A.), Baylor University (M.S., M.D.) and he received a Doctor
Honoris Causa from the University of Caen, the University of Paris and the
University of Helsinki.
48
Dr.
Phillip A. Bauman. Dr.
Bauman, 52, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since February
1998. Since 1999, he has been Senior Attending of Orthopedic Surgery at St.
Luke’s/Roosevelt Hospital Center in Manhattan and since 2000, he has served as
an elected member of the Executive Committee of the Medical Board of St.
Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital. Since 2005, he has been on the Board of Managers
for
the Hudson Crossing Surgery Center. Since 1997, he has been Assistant Professor
of Orthopedic Surgery at Columbia University. Since 1994, he has been a Vice
President of Orthopedic Associates of New York. He is an active member of
the
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the American Orthopaedic Society
for
Sports Medicine, the New York State Society of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the
American Medical Association. He was graduated from Harvard College (A.B.),
Harvard University (A.M., Biology) and the College of Physicians and Surgeons
at
Columbia University (M.D.).
G.
Morgan Browne. Mr.
Browne, 73, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since June 1992.
Since 2004, he has been President and since 2000, a Trustee of Planting Fields
Foundation, a supporting institution of Planting Fields Arboretum State Historic
Park. He is Chairman of the OSI Pharmaceuticals Foundation which supports
cancer
and diabetes patient care and science education. From 2001 to 2003, he served
as
Chief Financial Officer of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a not-for-profit
institution that conducts research and education programs in the biological
sciences. From 1985 to 2000, he was the Administrative Director of Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory. In prior years, he was active in the management of numerous
scientifically based companies as an officer, as an individual consultant
and as
an associate of Laurent Oppenheim Associates, Industrial Management Consultants.
He was a founding director of the New York Biotechnology Association. He
was
graduated from Yale University (B.A.).
Dugald
A. Fletcher. Mr.
Fletcher, 78, was appointed Lead Independent Director on November 2, 2006.
Since
1996, he has served as a member of our Board of Directors. Since 1984, h
e has
served as President of Fletcher & Company, Inc., a management consulting
firm. Until the end of 1997, he was Chairman of Binnings Building Products
Company, Inc. His previous business appointments include: adviser to
Gabelli/Rosenthal LP, a leveraged buyout fund; Chairman of Keller Industries,
building and consumer products; Senior Vice President of Booz-Allen &
Hamilton; President of Booz-Allen Acquisition Services; Executive Vice President
of Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis and a Director of Paine Webber, Inc.; and
President of Baker Weeks and Co., Inc., a New York Stock Exchange member
firm.
He is currently a Trustee of the Gabelli Growth Fund and a Director of the
Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund, Inc. He was graduated from
Harvard College (A.B.) and Harvard Business School (M.B.A.).
Charles
E. Ramsey. Mr.
Ramsey, 65, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since October
2002.
Since 1997, he has been a consultant. He is a retired founder and principal
of
Ramsey/Beirne Associates, Inc., an executive search firm that specialized
in
recruiting top officers for high technology companies, many of which were
backed
by venture capital. He is Chairman Emeritus of Bridges to Community, a
non-governmental organization dedicated to construction projects in Nicaragua.
As Chairman Emeritus, he serves on the Executive, Personnel and Administration
and Fund Development Committees. He was graduated from Wittenberg University
(B.A.).
James
E. Roberts. Mr.
Roberts, 62, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since June
1995.
Since January 2006, he has been President of AequiCap Insurance Company and
since September 2007, President of AequiCap Program Administrators. Mr. Roberts
is also a senior officer of various other AequiCap affiliated entities. From
November 2002 to October 2005, he was Executive Vice President and Chief
Underwriting Officer of the Reinsurance Division of Alea North America Company
and Senior Vice President of Alea North America Insurance Company. From October
1999 to November 2002, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Insurance Corporation of New York, Dakota Specialty Insurance Company, and
Recor
Insurance Company Inc., all members of the Trenwick Group, Ltd. From October
1999 to March 2000, he served as Vice Chairman of Chartwell Reinsurance Company
(also a member of Trenwick Group, Ltd.) and from March 2000 to November 2002
he
was the company's Chairman and CEO. He was graduated from Cornell University
(A.B.).
49
Richard
P. Shanley.
Mr.
Shanley, 61, joined our Board on March 12, 2007. From February 2001 to December
31, 2006, he was a partner of Deloitte & Touche LLP. From March 1976 to
January 2001, he was employed by Eisner LLP and was a partner from 1982 until
2001. During his over 30 years of public accounting experience, he served
as
lead audit partner on numerous audit engagements for public and private
companies and companies making public stock offerings, including those requiring
application of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404. He served as lead audit partner
primarily for biotech, pharmaceutical and high-tech companies, including
companies enabled by nanotechnology. He has been actively involved on the
Biotech Council of New Jersey, the New Jersey Technology Council, the New
York
Biotechnology Association, the Connecticut Venture Group, the Biotechnology
Industry Organization and the NanoBusiness Alliance. He is an active member
of
the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants and the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He is currently serving his fourth
term on the New York State Society of CPA's Professional Ethics Committee.
He is
a licensed Certified Public Accountant in New Jersey and New York. He was
graduated from Fordham University (B.S.) and Long Island University (M.B.A.
in
Accounting).
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Our
Board
of Directors maintains six standing committees: an Executive Committee, an
Audit
Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating Committee, a Valuation
Committee and an Independent Directors Committee. All of the members of each
committee other than Mr. Harris and Mr. Jamison (who sit on the Executive
Committee) are non-interested directors (as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of
the
1940 Act).
The
Executive Committee has and may exercise those rights, powers and authority
that
the Board of Directors from time to time grants to it, except where action
by
the full Board is required by statute, an order of the SEC or our charter
or
bylaws. The Executive Committee did not meet as a separate committee and
did not
act by unanimous written consent in 2007. The members of the Executive Committee
are Messrs. Harris (Chairman), Jamison, Browne, Ramsey and Dr.
Bardin.
The
Audit
Committee operates pursuant to a charter that sets forth the responsibilities
of
the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include selecting
and retaining our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing
with
the independent registered public accounting firm the planning, scope and
results of their audit and our financial statements and the fees for services
performed, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm
the
adequacy of internal control systems, reviewing our annual financial statements
and receiving our audit reports and financial statements. The Audit Committee
met four times and did not act by unanimous written consent in 2007. In 2007,
the members of the Audit Committee were Messrs. Fletcher (Chairman), Roberts,
Browne, Ayres and Shanley, all of whom are considered independent under the
rules promulgated by the Nasdaq Global Market.
The
Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written charter and determines
the
compensation for our executive officers and the amount of salary and bonus
to be
included in the compensation package for each of our officers. The Compensation
Committee met four times and acted by unanimous written consent once in 2007.
The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Roberts (Chairman),
Fletcher, Ramsey and Dr. Bauman.
The
Nominating Committee acts pursuant to a written charter as an advisory committee
to the Board by identifying individuals qualified to serve on the Board as
directors and on committees of the Board, and recommending nominees to stand
for
election as directors at the next annual meeting of shareholders.
The Nominating Committee met one time and did not act by unanimous written
consent in 2007. The members of the Nominating Committee are Dr. Bardin
(Chairman) and Messrs. Ayres, Shanley and Dr. Bauman.
50
The
Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by
shareholders. In considering candidates submitted by shareholders, the
Nominating Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board and
the
qualifications of the candidate. The Nominating Committee may also take into
consideration the number of shares held by the recommending shareholder and
the
length of time that such shares have been held. To have a candidate considered
by the Nominating Committee, a shareholder must submit the recommendation in
writing and must include:
• The
name
of the shareholder and evidence of the person's ownership of shares of the
Company, including the number of shares owned and the length of time of
ownership;
• The
name
of the candidate, the candidate's resume or a listing of his or her
qualifications to be a Director of the Company and the person's consent to
be
named as a Director if selected by the Nominating Committee and nominated by
the
Board and consent to serve if elected; and
• If
requested by the Nominating Committee, a completed and signed director's
questionnaire.
The
shareholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to
the
Company's Corporate Secretary, c/o Harris & Harris Group, Inc., 111 West
57th Street, Suite 1100, New York, New York 10019, and must be received by
the
Corporate Secretary not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to
the
anniversary of the date of the Company's immediately preceeding annual meeting
of shareholders or, if the meeting has moved by more than 30 days, it must
be
received by the Corporate Secretary not later than the close of business
on the
10th
day
following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed
or such public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was made, whichever
first occurs.
The
Valuation Committee reviews and approves the valuation of our assets, from
time
to time, as prescribed by the 1940 Act, pursuant to Valuation Procedures
established by our Board of Directors. The Valuation Committee met six times
and
did not act by unanimous written consent in 2007. The members of the Valuation
Committee are Messrs. Browne (Chairman), Ayres, Fletcher, Ramsey, Roberts,
Shanley and Drs. Bardin and Bauman.
The
Independent Directors Committee has the responsibility of proposing corporate
governance and long-term planning matters to the Board of Directors and making
the required determinations pursuant to the 1940 Act. The Independent Directors
Committee met four times and did not act by unanimous written consent in
2007.
The members of the Independent Directors Committee are Messrs. Fletcher
(Chairman), Ayres, Browne, Ramsey, Roberts, Shanley and Drs. Bardin and
Bauman.
On
November 2, 2006, the Board of Directors appointed an Ad Hoc Pricing Committee.
The Pricing Committee is responsible for approving the price of any offering
of
our Common Stock, approving the number of shares being offered in such offering,
providing final approval of the underwriting agreement and handling any other
details as are necessary to effect any transactions pursuant to this
registration statement. The members of the Pricing Committee are Messrs. Harris
(Chairman), Browne and Dr. Bardin.
51
The
following table sets forth the dollar
range of equity securities beneficially
owned by each director as of December 31, 2007.
Name
of Director
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities
Beneficially Owned (1)(2)(3)
|
|||
Interested
Directors
|
||||
Charles
E. Harris(4)
|
Over
$100,000
|
|||
Douglas
W. Jamison (4)
|
Over
$100,000
|
|||
Kelly
S. Kirkpatrick (5)(6)
|
|
$50,001
- $100,000
|
||
Lori
D. Pressman (5)
|
|
$50,001
- $100,000
|
||
Independent
Directors
|
||||
W.
Dillaway Ayres, Jr.
|
|
$10,001
- $50,000
|
||
Dr.
C. Wayne Bardin
|
Over
$100,000
|
|||
Dr.
Phillip A. Bauman
|
Over
$100,000
|
|||
G.
Morgan Browne
|
Over
$100,000
|
|||
Dugald
A. Fletcher
|
Over
$100,000
|
|||
Charles
E. Ramsey
|
Over
$100,000
|
|||
James
E. Roberts
|
Over
$100,000
|
|||
Richard
P. Shanley
|
|
$10,001
- $50,000
|
(1)
|
Beneficial
ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2)
under
the 1934 Act.
|
(2) |
The
dollar ranges are: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000
and
over $100,000.
|
(3) |
The
dollar ranges are based on the price of the equity securities as
of
December 31, 2007.
|
(4) |
Denotes
an individual who is an "interested person" as defined in the 1940
Act.
|
(5) |
Denotes
an individual who may be considered an "interested person" because
of
consulting work performed for
us.
|
(6) |
Ms.
Kirkpatrick will not be standing for re-election at the 2008 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders.
|
Principal
Shareholders and Ownership by Directors and Executive
Officers
Set
forth
below is information as of March 31, 2008, with respect to the beneficial
ownership of our Common Stock by (i) each of our directors and named executive
officers (as defined below) and (ii) all of our directors and executive officers
as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, all shares are
beneficially owned and investment and voting power is held by the persons
named
as owners. At this time, we are unaware of any shareholder owning 5 percent
or
more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock other than the ones noted
below.
Unless otherwise provided, the address of each holder is c/o Harris & Harris
Group, Inc., 111 West 57th
Street,
Suite 1100, New York, New York 10019.
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership(1)
|
Percentage of Outstanding
Common Shares Owned(2)
|
|||||
Independent
Directors:
|
|||||||
W.
Dillaway Ayres, Jr.
|
6,331(3)
|
*
|
|||||
Dr.
C. Wayne Bardin
|
29,324
|
*
|
|||||
Dr.
Phillip A. Bauman
|
31,759(4)
|
*
|
|||||
G.
Morgan Browne
|
36,191
|
*
|
|||||
Dugald
A. Fletcher
|
24,621
|
*
|
|||||
Charles
E. Ramsey
|
41,717
|
*
|
|||||
James
E. Roberts
|
26,047
|
*
|
|||||
Richard
P. Shanley
|
5,324
|
*
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Interested
Directors:
|
|
||||||
Charles
E. Harris
|
1,675,666(5)
|
7.0
|
|||||
Douglas
W. Jamison
|
267,324(6)
|
1.1
|
|||||
Kelly
S. Kirkpatrick
|
7,851
|
*
|
|||||
Lori
D. Pressman
|
9,437
|
*
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Named
Executive Officers:
|
|
||||||
Alexei
A. Andreev
|
271,697(7)
|
1.2
|
|||||
Sandra
M. Forman
|
126,902(8)
|
*
|
|||||
Michael
A. Janse
|
237,891(9)
|
1.0
|
|||||
|
|||||||
All
directors and executive officers as a
group (20 persons)
|
3,003,324(10)
|
12.0
|
52
*
Less
than 1 percent.
(1) |
Beneficial
ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of
the
Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
|
(2) |
The
percentage of ownership is based on 23,314,573 shares of common
stock
outstanding as of March 31, 2008, together with the exercisable
options
for such shareholder, as applicable. In computing the percentage
ownership
of a shareholder, shares that can be acquired upon the exercise
of
outstanding options are not deemed outstanding for purposes of
computing
the percentage ownership of any other person.
|
(3) |
Includes
5,441 shares owned by Bardin LLC for the Bardin LLC Profit-Sharing
Keogh.
|
(4) |
Includes
5,637 shares owned by Ms. Milbry C. Polk, Dr. Bauman's wife; 100
shares
owned by Adelaide Polk-Bauman, Dr. Bauman's daughter; 100 shares
owned by
Milbry Polk-Bauman, Dr. Bauman's daughter; and 100 shares owned
by Mary
Polk-Bauman, Dr. Bauman's daughter. Ms. Milbry C. Polk is the custodian
for the accounts of the three
children.
|
(5) |
Includes
1,039,559 shares owned by Mrs. Susan T. Harris, Mr. Harris’s wife and our
Corporate Secretary, 30,766 shares owned by Mr. Harris and 600,841
shares
that can be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding options by
Mr.
Harris.
|
(6) |
Includes
247,681 shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding
options.
|
(7) |
Includes
261,428 shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding
options.
|
(8) |
Includes
250 shares owned by Edward Forman, Ms. Forman's husband, 270 shares
owned
jointly with Edward Forman and 119,200 shares that can be acquired
upon
the exercise of outstanding options by Ms.
Forman.
|
(9) |
Includes
237,891 shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding
options.
|
(10) |
Includes
1,668,513 shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding
options.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion & Analysis
Overview
This
Compensation Discussion & Analysis ("CD&A") describes the material
elements of compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer and the three most highly
paid
executive officers (other than the principal executive officer and the principal
financial officer) serving as such at the end of 2007 (the "named executive
officers"), who are:
· |
Charles
E. Harris, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a Managing
Director;
|
· |
Douglas
W. Jamison, our President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial
Officer (in 2007) and a Managing Director;
|
· |
Alexei
A. Andreev, an Executive Vice President and a Managing
Director;
|
· |
Michael
A. Janse, an Executive Vice President and a Managing Director;
and
|
· |
Sandra
M. Forman, our General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Director
of
Human Resources.
|
This
CD&A focuses on the information contained in the following tables and
related footnotes and narrative for primarily the last completed fiscal year,
and we also describe compensation actions taken before or after the last
completed fiscal year to the extent it enhances the understanding of our
executive compensation for the last completed fiscal year. Pursuant to our
Compensation Committee's written charter, the Committee oversees the design
and
administration of our executive compensation program. The Committee ensures
that
the total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable
and
competitive.
53
Compensation
Program Objectives and Philosophy
In
General. The
objectives of the Company's compensation program are to:
·
|
attract,
motivate and retain employees by providing market-competitive compensation
while preserving company resources;
|
·
|
maintain
our leadership position as a venture capital firm specializing
in tiny
technology, especially nanotechnology; and
|
·
|
align
management's interests with shareholders' interests.
|
To
achieve the above objectives, the Committee has designed a comprehensive
compensation program in 2007 for our executive officers and all 12 of our
permanent, full-time employees that is composed of a base salary and equity
awards in the form of stock options. The Committee believes that the equity
component of compensation is a crucial component of our compensation package.
Shorter-term and longer-term vesting stock options are utilized for shorter-term
and longer-term incentive, and to make the Company's compensation program
more
competitive, particularly with compensation programs of private partnerships
that, unlike the Company, are able to award carried interests taxable as
long-term gains and to permit co-investments in deals. Such private partnerships
also are more easily able to pay cash bonuses because they do not have the
expenses associated with being publicly traded. Our executive compensation
programs and related data are reviewed throughout the year and on an annual
basis by the Committee to determine if the compensation program is providing
its
intended results.
The
Committee believes that retention is especially important for a company of
our
size (12 permanent employees) and the specialized nature of our business.
Our
employees have been selected and trained to support our focus on investment
in
tiny-technology companies and our specialized regulation and administration
as a
business development company. Our tiny-technology focus requires highly
specialized scientific knowledge. There are relatively few individuals who
have
both such scientific knowledge and venture capital experience. Additionally,
our
business development company structure requires specialized management,
administrative, legal and financial knowledge of our specific regulatory
regime.
Because there are very few business development companies, it would be difficult
to find replacements for certain executive, legal and financial positions.
Competitive
Market.
For our
investment-team members, the competition for retention and recruitment is
primarily private venture capital firms, hedge funds and, to a lesser extent,
investment banking firms. Such a fund commonly pays at least 20 percent of
the
profits (including capital gains), or carried interest, of each newly-raised
fund to the management firm, which awards interests to its partners and
employees. For our legal and accounting professionals, in addition to the
foregoing, the competition is other public companies without regard to industry,
asset management companies and legal and accounting firms. The Company does
not
have a readily identifiable peer group, because most business development
companies are not early-stage venture-capital companies, and most other
early-stage venture-capital companies are not publicly traded. Thus, we do
not
emphasize the use of peer comparison groups in the design of our compensation
program. We do utilize compensation comparables, on an individual basis,
to the
extent that they seem appropriately analogous, as provided to the Committee
by
an independent compensation consultant, as one factor in determining
compensation.
Compensation
Process. On
an
annual basis, the Committee reviews and approves each element of compensation
for each of our executive officers, taking into consideration the recommendation
of our Chief Executive Officer (for compensation other than his own, which
is
subject to his employment agreement as discussed below) in the context of
the
Committee's compensation philosophy, to ensure that the total compensation
program and the weight of each of its elements meets the overall objectives
discussed above. For the Chief Compliance Officer, the Committee recommends
her
compensation to the full Board, for approval by at least a majority of the
non-interested directors (as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act).
In
2007,
an independent compensation consultant, Johnson & Associates, supplied the
Committee with market data on all officers' positions. The information provided
for 2007-2008 was for private-equity firms,
venture capital firms and broad investment management firms, and was adjusted
in
an effort to reflect compensation for a venture capital firm with $100 -
$200
million in assets under management. Data was also provided for public companies
with comparable market capitalizations. Further data was provided for 1940
Act
compliance personnel (collectively, the "Identified Group"). The independent
consultant did not identify the names of companies included in the Indentified
Group. The Committee considers recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer
regarding salaries, along with factors such as individual performance, current
and potential impact on Company performance, reputation, skills and experience.
When determining compensation, the Committee considers the importance of
retaining certain key officers whose replacement would be challenging owing
to
the Company's status as a 1940 Act company and owing to its tiny-technology
specialty. The Committee also considers the highly specialized nature of
certain
positions in determining overall compensation.
54
When
addressing executive compensation matters, the Committee generally meets
outside
the presence of all executive officers except our Chief Executive Officer
and
our General Counsel, each of whom leaves the meeting when his/her compensation
is reviewed.
Regulatory
Considerations.
The
1940 Act permits business development companies to either pay out up to 20
percent of net income after taxes through the implementation of a profit-sharing
plan or issue up to 20 percent of shares issued and outstanding through
implementation of a stock-option plan. The exercise price of stock options
may
not be less than the current market value at the date of issuance of the
options.
We
have
applied for exemptive relief from the SEC permitting us to issue restricted
stock pursuant to the Harris & Harris Group, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan
(the "Stock Plan") to employees and to permit non-employee directors to
participate in the Stock Plan. Until such time as we receive such exemptive
relief and such provisions are approved by shareholders, we will not issue
any
shares of restricted stock and our non-employee directors will not participate
in the Stock Plan.
The
Company has been informed that the SEC has commenced its review of the exemptive
application, and we have received and responded to formal written comments.
We
cannot, however, evaluate whether or when an order regarding our application
for
the relief requested may be granted.
We
have
also designed our Stock Plan with the intention that awards made thereunder
generally will qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m)
of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), but we reserve the right
to pay
amounts thereunder that do not qualify as such performance-based compensation
if
we determine such payments to be appropriate in light of our compensation
objectives from time to time. Section 162(m) of the Code disallows a tax
deduction to publicly held companies for compensation paid to their chief
executive officer or any of their three other most highly compensated executive
officers and chief financial officer, to the extent that compensation exceeds
$1
million per covered officer in any fiscal year. However, if compensation
qualifies as performance-based, the limitation does not apply.
Our
status as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Code makes
the deductibility of our compensation arrangements a much less important
factor
for the Committee to consider than it would be if we were an operating company.
Under Subchapter M, the Company cannot deduct operating expenses from its
long-term capital gains, which are its most significant form of income. The
Company presently has more operating expenses than it can deduct for tax
purposes, even before equity compensation.
Compensation
Components
The
principal elements of our executive compensation program for 2007 are base
salary, equity and other benefits and perquisites. The Committee believes
that
each element is essential to achieve the Company's objectives as set forth
above. The Committee is mindful of keeping cash compensation expenses at
as low
a level of total operating expenses as is consistent with maintaining the
Company's competitiveness versus private venture capital funds while meeting
the
expenses of complying with the regulatory
requirements of a publicly traded company. Therefore, the equity component
of
compensation is key to keeping overall compensation competitive, while making
prudent use of the Company's resources.
55
Effective
January 1, 2007, the base salary of Sandra M. Forman, our General Counsel,
Chief
Compliance Officer and Director of Human Resources, was increased from $215,000
in 2006 to $267,403 in 2007, to remain market competitive for her services
and
to put her base salary on parity with our Managing Directors.
All
other
named executive officers received cost of living adjustments in 2007. There
presently are no contemplated increases in base salary for any of the named
executive officers in 2008 other than cost-of-living adjustments.
Equity
Incentive Awards.
In
General
Commencing
in 2006, we have provided the opportunity for our named executive officers
and
other employees to earn longer-term and shorter-term equity incentive awards.
Equity incentive awards in the form of options potentially generate cash
for the
Company that can be used for portfolio company investments and for working
capital.
Longer-Term
Equity Incentive Awards
The
longer-term equity incentive awards provide employees with the incentive
to stay
with us for longer periods of time, which in turn provides us with greater
stability. Longer-term equity incentive awards are meant to substitute for
carried interest that our investment professionals would receive were they
employed by private-sector venture capital firms, which typically pay at
least
20 percent of profits before any taxes, and that carried interest is usually
in
the form of long-term capital gains, not ordinary income.
The
Committee believes that strategically timed awards of restricted stock are
also
important to ensuring the retention, stability and desired succession of
executive talent, but the Company is not permitted to grant awards of restricted
stock unless the Company receives an exemptive order from the SEC to do
so.
On July
11, 2006, we filed an application with the SEC to obtain such exemptive relief
(as described above) and in June 2007 and February 2008, the Company responded
to comments from the staff of the SEC on the application. If we receive the
exemptive relief, the Committee will not grant any awards of restricted stock
unless the amended Stock Plan is approved by shareholders, and such awards
would
be longer term.
Shorter-Term
Equity Incentive Awards
Shorter-term
equity incentive awards help to motivate employees in the short term, as
we
generally do not pay annual cash bonuses. Without cash bonuses or cash retained
through the exercise and sale of shorter-term options, the Committee's
independent compensation consultant has advised that certain key positions
are
not competitive when compared with the Identified Group. Shorter-term equity
incentive awards also permit each executive officer to increase his/her
ownership in Company stock, pursuant to minimum share ownership guidelines
established by our Board. Shorter-term vesting periods also have the potential
of generating cash for the company in the short term, through the purchase
of
stock in the course of the exercise of options, that can be used for making
venture-capital investments and for working capital.
56
If
the
named executive officers, exclusive of Mr. Harris, as he is scheduled to
retire
on December 31, 2008, do not receive sufficient cash from the exercise and
sale
of stock options in a year to provide market-competitive total compensation,
as
determined by the Committee, based on advice from the independent compensation
consultant, the Committee will pay the named executive officers cash bonuses.
No
such discretion was exercised in 2007. The Committee believes that retention
of
key employees is crucial because of the specialized nature of our business
as
described more fully below. Additionally, the Committee has considered that,
owing to the scheduled retirement of Mr. Harris, the importance of retaining
the
other team members has increased.
Awards
Under the Stock Plan
In
accordance with the Stock Plan, which was approved by shareholders at the
2006
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Committee can issue options from time
to
time for up to 20 percent of the total shares of stock issued and outstanding.
Thus, the number of shares of stock able to be reserved for the grant of
awards
under the Stock Plan will automatically increase (or decrease) with each
increase (or decrease) in the number of shares of stock issued and outstanding.
The Board intends to increase the number of shares reserved for stock option
grants (currently 4,662,915) from time to time as the number of outstanding
shares increases. The Committee may grant awards under the Stock Plan to
the
full extent permitted at the time of each grant in order to compete with
private
equity firms by retaining the specially qualified and trained personnel that
have been carefully recruited and developed for the Company's specialized
business. Because our primary competitors are organized as private partnerships,
they do not have the overhead of a publicly traded company. As a consequence,
unlike the Company, they can afford for cash compensation to be a larger
percentage of their total expenses. Unlike us, they are not prohibited from
paying out at least 20 percent of their profits to key employees, primarily
in
the form of long-term capital gains. They also, unlike us, are permitted
to
grant their employees co-investment rights.
Under
the
Stock Plan, no more than 25 percent of the shares of stock reserved for the
grant of the awards under the Stock Plan may be restricted stock awards at
any
time during the term of the Stock Plan. If any shares of restricted stock
are
awarded, such awards will reduce on a percentage basis the total number of
shares of stock for which options may be awarded. If we do not receive exemptive
relief from the SEC to issue restricted stock, all shares granted under the
Stock Plan may be subject to stock options. If we were to receive such exemptive
relief and were to issue the full 25 percent of the shares of stock reserved
for
grant under the Stock Plan as restricted stock, no more than 75 percent of
the
shares granted under the Stock Plan could be subject to stock options. No
more
than 1,000,000 shares of our common stock may be made subject to awards under
the Stock Plan to any individual in any year.
On
June
27, 2007, the Committee and the full Board of Directors approved individual
stock-option awards for certain officers and employees of the Company. The
terms
and conditions of the stock options granted were set forth in award agreements
between the Company and each award recipient. A total of 1,700,609 stock
options
were granted with vesting dates ranging from December 2007 to June 2014,
with an
exercise price of $11.11, which was the closing volume weighted average price
on
the date of the grant. Upon exercise, the shares will be issued from our
previously authorized but unissued shares.
The
Committee has generally granted the same number of stock options to each
of the
Managing Directors, with the exception of Mr. Harris as discussed below.
Additionally, in 2007, the Committee granted an additional 50,000 options
to Mr.
Jamison in anticipation of his growing role in the Company as the successor
to
Mr. Harris as Chief Executive Officer in 2009 upon Mr. Harris's retirement.
In
2007, Mr. Janse received an additional 429,128 options to give him an equivalent
number of options to Mr. Andreev.
The
number of options per employee and the vesting and expiration dates were
originally proposed by the independent consultant after conversations with
the
Chairman of the Committee and input from the Chief Executive Officer (with
respect to options other than his own). All awards granted to executive officers
vest subject to continued employment with the Company through each applicable
vesting date, except for certain retirees. All stock-option awards to officers
will be subject to stock-retention guidelines (as described below on page
60).
57
In
2006
and 2007, new grants were planned in advance of, and in anticipation of,
the
expiration of prior grants. Commencing in 2008, the Committee may give
quarterly, rather than annual, grants to executive officers. The Committee
believes that giving four smaller grants quarterly, rather than one annual
grant, will more closely align employees' interests with those of shareholders.
We do not time stock option grants in coordination with the release of material,
non-public information, nor do we time the release of material, non-public
information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive
compensation.
Option
grants in 2007 were not subject to performance goals. Other than stock
options
being tied to stock price, no other items of corporate performance were
taken
into account at the time of grant, because of the difficulty of determining
annual performance metrics. Business development companies like us do not
report
earnings per share; moreover, write-downs and write-offs of investments
are an
expected part of our risk-seeking strategy, and it is not uncommon for
even our
most successful investments to take years to come to fruition. The Committee
may
create performance goals for the vesting of restricted stock (subject to
receipt
of an exemptive order). If performance goals are used in the future, the
Board
will have the authority to make equitable adjustments to the performance
goals
in recognition of unusual or non-recurring events affecting the Company
or the
financial statements of the Company, in response to changes in applicable
laws
or regulations or to account for items of gain, loss or expense determined
to be
extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence or related
to the
disposal of a segment of a business or related to a change in accounting
principles.
Generally,
the Committee is made aware of the tax and accounting treatment of various
compensation alternatives. SFAS 123(R) requires us to record the fair value
of
equity awards on the date of grant as a component of equity. We account for
the
Stock Plan in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based
Payment," which requires that we determine the fair value of all share-based
payments to employees, including the fair value of grants of employee stock
options, and record these amounts as an expense in the Statement of Operations
over the vesting period with a corresponding increase to our additional paid-in
capital. The increase to our operating expenses is offset by the increase
to our
additional paid-in capital, resulting in no net impact to our net asset value.
Thus, the granting of options is expected to have no net impact on our net
asset
value. If and when the options are exercised, the net asset value per share
will
be decreased if the net asset value per share at the time of exercise is
higher
than the exercise price, and increased if the net asset value per share at
the
time of exercise is lower than the exercise price. As a result, although
we
consider the accounting treatment of granting options, we do not consider
the
accounting treatment to be a dominant factor in the form and/or design of
awards.
Additionally,
we do not record tax benefits associated with expensing of stock options,
because we intend to qualify as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As
a RIC,
we cannot use all of our existing operating expenses for tax purposes.
10b5-1
Plans
We
have
established a policy of permitting our officers to enter into trading plans
to
sell shares of our common stock in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities
Act of 1934. The policy allows our participating officers to adopt a
pre-arranged stock trading plan to buy or sell pre-determined amounts of
our
common stock over a period of time. This policy was established in recognition
of the liquidity and diversification objectives of our officers, including
enabling our officers to sell certain shares of our common stock (such as
some
of the shares of our common stock they acquire upon exercise of stock options,
to pay for the exercise of options, to provide for taxes triggered by the
exercise of options and to generate cash from the exercise of options).
Benefits
and Perquisites. We
provide the opportunity for our named executive officers and other full-time
employees to receive certain perquisites and general health and welfare
benefits, discussed more fully below, which consist of life- and
health-insurance benefits, reimbursement for certain medical expenses and
gym-membership fees. We also offer participation in our defined contribution
401(k) plan. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Committee approved
a
401(k) plan match of 100 percent of employee contributions. Except as provided
in our employment agreement with Mr. Harris, our executive officers generally
receive the same benefits and perquisites as our full-time administrative
employees.
58
Profit
Sharing.
Prior
to the adoption of the Stock Plan, the Company maintained the Amended and
Restated Harris & Harris Group, Inc. Employee Profit-Sharing Plan (the "2002
Plan"). Under the 2002 Plan, approximately 90 percent of the amount determined
as "qualifying income" was paid out to participants pursuant to distribution
percentages determined by the Committee. The remaining payment was paid out
after we finalized our tax returns for each plan year. Effective May 4, 2006,
the 2002 Plan was terminated. On January 31, 2007, a final profit sharing
award
of $261,661 was paid to certain participants related to the 2005 plan year
after
finalization of our tax returns for 2005. Please see the "Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation" column and accompanying footnote in the 2007 Summary
Compensation Table for more information about profit sharing
awards.
Internal
Pay Equity.
In
2007, the Committee discussed the internal pay equity of the named executive
officers. The Committee noted that Mr. Harris's compensation is appropriate
based on the unique qualifications and skills required for the Chief Executive
Officer position in our Company and his role as Founder. The Committee further
noted that our investment professionals work together as a team rather than
as a
collection of individuals, which was the basis for the Committee's decision
to
pay all Managing Directors (except for Mr. Harris) identically. The Committee
believes that, on a small team, all members must pull their full weight.
Accordingly, the Committee believes that the team approach to compensation
promotes teamwork among the Managing Directors. The Committee also noted
that
Ms. Forman's base salary was on parity with the Managing Directors to make
her
compensation competitive based on her 1940 Act specialty and her management
role
in the Company as General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Director
of
Human Resources. The Committee further noted that the Managing Directors
should
receive more stock options than other employees based on their income-generating
role and to keep their total compensation competitive with private
venture-capital firms.
Compensation
of our Chief Executive Officer
The
Committee reviews all elements of the compensation of Charles E. Harris,
our
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a Managing Director, on an annual basis
and then makes a determination about his compensation without his presence,
subject to his employment agreement.
Pursuant
to that agreement, as most recently amended as of August 2, 2007 (the
"Employment Agreement"), during the period of employment, Mr. Harris is to
receive compensation in the form of base salary, with automatic yearly
adjustments to reflect inflation, which amounted to a minimum required base
salary of $246,651 for 2006. In addition, the Board may increase such salary,
and subsequently decrease it, but not below the level provided for by the
automatic adjustments described above. Mr. Harris's base salary for 2006
was
increased to $300,000 (thereby also increasing his SERP benefit as described
below) in part in recognition of a 74 percent decrease in Mr. Harris's
profit-sharing allocation in recent years in order to provide additional
profit
sharing to other employees. This was the first salary increase for Mr. Harris,
other than cost-of-living adjustments, since 1994. Mr. Harris's base salary
for
2007 and 2008 was increased to $306,187 and $314,623, respectively, based
on
cost-of-living adjustments.
In
2007,
the Committee granted to Mr. Harris the following stock
options:
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Year
of Vesting
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|||||||
|
|
of
Options
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Price
|
|
||||
9
Yr NQSO (vest 50% on
|
|||||||||||||
12/27/07,
50% vest of 12/27/08)
|
6/26/2016
|
120,491
|
120,490
|
$
|
11.11
|
The
amount of options granted to Mr. Harris was based on creating long-term
incentives for Mr. Harris with respect to strategy and investment, balance
sheet, personnel and lease decisions despite his scheduled retirement, in
recognition of his role as Founder of the Company, and as an incentive for
him
to sign upon his retirement a three-year non-compete agreement covering the
period after his retirement.
59
Under
his
employment agreement, Mr. Harris is entitled to participate in all compensation
and employee benefit plans or programs, and to receive all benefits,
perquisites, and emoluments, for which salaried employees are eligible. Under
the Employment Agreement, we furnish Mr. Harris with certain perquisites,
which
include a company car, health-club membership, personal trainer, membership
in
certain social or country clubs, a reimbursement for an annual physical
examination and up to a $5,000 annual reimbursement, adjusted for inflation,
over the period of the agreement, for personal financial or tax
advice.
The
Employment Agreement also provides Mr. Harris with life insurance for the
benefit of his designated beneficiary in the amount of at least $2,000,000;
provides reimbursement for uninsured medical expenses, not to exceed $10,000
per
annum, adjusted for inflation, over the period of the agreement; provides
Mr.
Harris and his spouse with long-term care insurance; and provides Mr. Harris
with disability insurance providing for continuation of 100 percent of his
base
salary for a specified period. These benefits are for the term of the Employment
Agreement. The Employment Agreement provides that the term of Mr. Harris's
employment may not be extended beyond December 31, 2008, unless a committee
of
the Board consisting of non-interested Directors extends the date by one
year
pursuant to the Executive Mandatory Retirement Benefit Plan, and Mr. Harris
agrees to serve beyond December 31, 2008.
Mr.
Harris's Employment Agreement also provides for a supplemental executive
retirement plan (the "SERP") and a severance compensation agreement for his
benefit. See "2007 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation" below for more
information about the SERP. For more information about Mr. Harris's severance
compensation, please see "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in
Control" below.
The
Committee determined that the Employment Agreement, the severance compensation
agreement and the awards made to Mr. Harris in 2007 pursuant to the Stock
Plan
are appropriate based on the unique qualifications and skills required for
the
Chief Executive Officer position in our Company. Our Chief Executive Officer
must have expertise in managing a public company, managing a business
development company and managing a venture-capital company. He must also
have
knowledge of tiny technology, particularly nanotechnology, have stature within
both the nanotechnology community and the venture-capital community and have
relationships with the investment banking community.
Share
Ownership Guidelines
Our
Board
of Directors has established a retained stock-ownership policy for our officers.
Pursuant to the policy, each executive officer is expected to own at least
25
percent of the net shares (after sales of stock to cover the purchase price
and
taxes triggered by the exercise of options) that he or she purchases in a
calendar year through the exercise of options covering up to $75,000 of
underlying stock based on current market value on the day of each transaction.
Each executive officer must then retain at least 50 percent of the net shares
(after sales of stock to cover the purchase price and taxes triggered by
the
exercise of options) above $75,000 until his or her purchases reach the
following share ownership levels:
Ownership Level
|
||||
Managing
Directors (including CEO)
|
$
|
4,500,000
|
||
Other
Deal Team Members (including General Counsel)
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
||
Other
Officers
|
1
X Base Salary
|
After
reaching the above ownership levels, each executive officer is expected to
retain 25 percent of the net shares (after sales of stock to cover the purchase
price and taxes triggered by the exercise of options) that he or she purchases
in any calendar year through the exercise of options. The policy aligns the
interests of our officers and directors with the interests of shareholders.
Our
Chief Executive Officer currently exceeds the guidelines. Other executive
officers are working toward the ownership levels as stock options are
exercised.
60
Compensation
and Share Ownership of Our Managing Directors
Messrs.
Harris, Jamison, Andreev, Janse and Wolfe are Managing Directors and are
primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of our portfolio. They
have
served in this capacity since 1984, 2002, 2005, 2007 and 2008 respectively,
although the title "Managing Director" was first utilized by our Company
in
2004.
See
the
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation of our Chief Executive
Officer” above for more information about the compensation of Mr. Harris.
Messrs. Jamison, Andreev, Janse and Wolfe each receive a fixed base salary
as
determined by our Compensation Committee, participate in the Equity Incentive
Plan (as described above) and receive all benefits, perquisites, and emoluments
for which salaried employees are eligible.
The
following table sets forth the dollar range of equity securities beneficially
owned by each Managing Director as of December 31, 2007.
Name
of Managing Director
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities
Beneficially
Owned
(1)(2)
|
|||
Charles
E. Harris
|
Over
$1,000,000 (3)
|
|||
Douglas
W. Jamison
|
Over
$1,000,000(4)
|
|
||
Alexei
A. Andreev
|
Over
$1,000,000(5)
|
|||
Michael
A. Janse
|
Over
$1,000,000(6)
|
|||
Daniel
B. Wolfe
|
$500,001-
$1,000,000(7)
|
___________________
(1) |
Beneficial
ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2)
of the
1934 Act.
|
(2) |
The
dollar ranges are: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000,
$100,001-$500,000, $500,001-$1,000,000 and over
$1,000,000.
|
(3) |
Includes
600,841 shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding
options.
|
(4) |
Includes
247,681 shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding
options.
|
(5) |
Includes
261,428 shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of
outstanding
options.
|
(6) |
Includes
237,891 shares that can be acquired upon the exercise of
outstanding
options.
|
(7) |
Reported
as of March 31, 2008. Mr. Wolfe was promoted to Managing
Director as of
January 1, 2008. Includes 111,999 shares that can be
acquired upon the
exercise of outstanding
options.
|
Related
Party Transactions
In
the
ordinary course of business, the Company enters into transactions with portfolio
companies that may be considered related party transactions. Other than these
transactions, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, there were no
transactions, or proposed transactions, in which the registrant was or is
a
participant in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect
material interest.
In
order
to ensure that the Company does not engage in any prohibited transactions
with
any persons affiliated with the Company, the Company has implemented procedures,
which are set forth in the Company’s Compliance Manual. Our Audit Committee must
review in advance any "related party" transaction, or series of similar
transactions, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was or is to
be a
party, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which such related
party had, or will have, a direct or indirect material interest. The Board
of
Directors reviews these procedures on an annual basis.
In
addition, the Company’s Code of Conduct for Directors and Employees ("Code of
Conduct"), which is signed by all employees and directors on an annual basis,
requires that all employees and directors avoid any conflict, or the appearance
of a conflict, between an individual’s personal interests and the interests of
the Company. Pursuant to the Code of Conduct, each employee and director must
disclose any conflicts of interest, or actions or relationships that might
give
rise to a conflict, to the Chief Compliance Officer. The Independent Directors
Committee is charged with monitoring and making recommendations to the Board
of
Directors regarding policies and practices relating to corporate governance.
If
there were any actions or relationships that might give rise to a conflict
of
interest, such actions or relationships would be reviewed and approved by the
Board of Directors.
61
Remuneration
of Named Executive Officers
2007
Summary Compensation Table
The
following table sets forth a summary for the years ended December 31, 2007,
and
December 31, 2006, of the cash and non-cash compensation paid to our named
executive officers. The primary elements of each named executive officer’s total
compensation reported in the table are base salary and equity incentives
consisting of stock options. The Summary Compensation Table should be read
in
conjunction with the CD&A and the other tables and narrative descriptions
that follow.
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
Option
Awards(1)
($)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation(2)
($)
|
|
Change
in Pension Value and Nonqualified Compensation Earnings(3)
($)
|
|
All
Other Compensation
($)(4)(6)(7)
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
||||||||
Charles
E. Harris
Chairman
of the Board,
Chief
Executive Officer, Managing Director(5)
|
2007
2006
|
306,187
300,000
|
3,374,224
2,034,482
|
0
29,067
|
42,063
54,692
|
418,479
405,628
|
4,140,953
2,823,869
|
|||||||||||||||
Douglas
W. Jamison
President,
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer (2007), Managing
Director, Former Vice President
|
2007
2006
|
267,403
262,000
|
953,931
668,677
|
0
3,957
|
0
—
|
15,500
15,000
|
1,236,834
949,634
|
|||||||||||||||
Alexei
A. Andreev
Managing
Director, Executive Vice President
|
2007
2006
|
267,403
262,000
|
897,250
668,677
|
0
0
|
—
—
|
15,500
15,000
|
1,180,153
945,677
|
|||||||||||||||
Michael
A. Janse
Managing
Director, Executive Vice President(8)
|
2007
2006
|
184,211
—
|
873,201
—
|
0
—
|
—
—
|
45,500
—
|
1,102,912
—
|
|||||||||||||||
Sandra
M. Forman, Esq.
General
Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, Director of Human
Resources
|
2007
2006
|
267,403
215,000
|
559,229
381,595
|
0
1,580
|
—
—
|
15,500
15,000
|
842,132
613,175
|
(1) |
The
figures in this column do not represent amounts actually paid to
the named
executive officers, but represent the aggregate dollar amount of
compensation cost recognized by us in 2007 under FAS 123(R) for
options
granted in 2007 and prior years. We use the Black-Scholes model
to
calculate compensation cost under FAS 123(R). You may find more
information about the assumptions we use in the Black-Scholes model
under
"Fair Valuation of Option
Awards."
|
(2) |
These
amounts represent the actual amounts earned as a result of realized
gains
during the year ended December 31, 2005, and paid out in 2006 and
2007,
under the Harris & Harris Group Employee Profit-Sharing Plan. These
2006 amounts are in addition to the $1,107,088 for Mr. Harris,
$165,308
for Mr. Jamison, and $62,685 for Ms. Forman reported in the 2005
proxy and
were determined in 2006 based on the finalization of our 2005 tax
returns.
|
62
(3) |
Represents
increase in pension obligation. There were no preferential or above
market
earnings on Mr. Harris’s deferred
compensation.
|
(4) |
The
amounts reported for Mr. Harris for 2007 represent actual amounts
of
benefits paid or payable including personal use of an automobile
totaling
$10,252, membership in a private club totaling $11,026, membership
in a
health club and use of a trainer totaling $19,333, medical care
reimbursement, consultation with a financial planner totaling $21,505,
long-term disability insurance, group term-life insurance, long-term
care
insurance for him and his wife and $20,500 in employer contributions
to
the Harris & Harris Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan. It also includes the
employer contribution to his SERP totaling $306,187.
|
(5) |
In
2007 and 2006, Mr. Harris's wife received compensation of $25,000
and
$21,000, respectively for serving as our Secretary.
|
(6) |
The
amounts reported for Mr. Janse for 2007 represent qualified moving
expenses paid totaling $30,000 and $15,500 in employer contributions
to
the Harris & Harris Group 401(k)
Plan.
|
(7) |
Except
for Mr. Harris (see footnote 4 above), and Mr. Janse (see footnote
6
above), amounts reported for 2007 represent our contributions on
behalf of
the named executive to the Harris & Harris Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan.
The named executive did not earn any other compensation reportable
in this
column that met the threshold reporting
requirements.
|
(8) |
Mr.
Janse joined the Company in April
2007.
|
Fair
Valuation of Option Awards
We
account for the Stock Plan in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No.
123(R),
"Share-Based Payment," which requires that we determine the fair value of
all
share-based payments to employees, including the fair value of grants of
employee stock options, and record these amounts as an expense in the Statement
of Operations over the vesting period with a corresponding increase to our
additional paid-in capital. The increase to our operating expenses is offset
by
the increase to our additional paid-in capital, resulting in no net impact
to
our net asset value. Additionally, we do not record the tax benefits associated
with the expensing of stock options, because we currently intend to qualify as a
RIC under Subchapter M of the Code.
The
fair
value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option pricing model as permitted by SFAS No. 123(R). The stock
options were awarded in five different grant types, each with different
contractual terms. The assumptions used in the calculation of fair value
using
the Black-Scholes model for each contract term for grants in 2007 were as
follows:
Type
of Award
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
Number of Options |
|
Expected Term |
|
Expected Volatility |
|
Expected Dividend |
|
Risk-free Interest |
|
Fair Value |
|
|||||||
Non-qualified
stock options
|
1.5
Years
|
380,000
|
1
|
42.6%
|
|
0%
|
|
4.93
|
|
$
|
2.11
|
|||||||||||
Non-qualified
stock options
|
2.5
Years
|
600,540
|
2
|
40.1%
|
|
0%
|
|
4.91
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|||||||||||
Non-qualified
stock options
|
3.5
Years
|
338,403
|
3
|
44.7%
|
|
0%
|
|
4.93
|
|
$
|
3.94
|
|||||||||||
Non-qualified
stock options
|
9
Years
|
381,666
|
Ranging
from
4.75-
6.28
|
|
|
Ranging
from 57.8% to 59.9%
|
|
0%
|
|
Ranging
from
4.97%
to
5.01%
|
|
|
Ranging
from
$5.92
to $6.85
|
|||||||||
Total
|
1,700,609
|
63
An
option's expected term is the estimated period between the grant date and
the
exercise date of the option. As the expected-term period increases, the fair
value of the option and the compensation cost will also increase. The
expected-term assumption is generally calculated using historical stock option
exercise data. The Company does not have historical exercise data to develop
such an assumption. In cases where companies do not have historical data
and
where the options meet certain criteria, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107
("SAB
107") provides the use of a simplified expected-term calculation. Accordingly,
the Company calculated the expected terms using the SAB 107 simplified
method.
Expected
volatility is the measure of how the stock's price is expected to fluctuate
over
a period of time. An increase in the expected volatility assumption yields
a
higher fair value of the stock option. Expected volatility factors for the
stock
options were based on the historical fluctuations in the Company’s stock price
over a period commensurate with the expected term of the option, adjusted
for
stock splits and dividends.
The
expected-dividend yield assumption is traditionally calculated based on a
company's historical dividend yield. An increase to the expected-dividend
yield
results in a decrease in the fair value of the option and resulting compensation
cost. Although the Company has declared deemed dividends in previous years,
most
recently in 2005, the amounts and timing of any future dividends cannot be
reasonably estimated. Therefore, for purposes of calculating fair value,
the
Company has assumed an expected- dividend yield of 0 percent.
The
risk-free interest rate assumptions are based on the annual yield on the
measurement date of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond, the maturity of which
equals the option’s expected term. Higher assumed interest rates yield higher
fair values.
2007
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The
following table presents information regarding the equity incentive awards
granted to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2007.
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
or
Units
(#)
|
|
All
Other
Option Awards:
Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)
|
|
Exercise
or
Base Price
of
Option Awards*
($/Sh)
|
|
Closing
Price
on Grant Date
($)
|
|
Grant
Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
|
|
||||||
Charles
E. Harris
|
June
27, 2007
|
N/A
|
240,981
|
$
|
11.11
|
$
|
11.15
|
$
|
1,460,345
|
||||||||||
Douglas
W. Jamison
|
June
27, 2007
|
N/A
|
250,000
|
$
|
11.11
|
$
|
11.15
|
$
|
785,737
|
||||||||||
Alexei
A. Andreev
|
June
27, 2007
|
N/A
|
200,000
|
$
|
11.11
|
$
|
11.15
|
$
|
628,590
|
||||||||||
Michael
A. Janse
|
June
27, 2007
|
|
N/A
|
629,128
|
$
|
11.11
|
$
|
11.15
|
$
|
2,038,717
|
|||||||||
Sandra
M. Forman
|
June
27, 2007
|
|
N/A
|
135,000
|
$
|
11.11
|
$
|
11.15
|
$
|
420,312
|
*Equals
the closing volume weighted average price on the date of
grant.
64
2007
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The
following table presents information regarding the outstanding equity awards
held by each of the named executive officers as of December 31,
2007.
Option
Awards
|
|||||||||||||
Name
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|||||
Charles
E. Harris
|
8,820
|
9,891(1)
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2016
|
||||||||
451,530
|
230,000(1)
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2016
|
|||||||||
20,000
|
0
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2008
|
|||||||||
0
|
26,666(2)
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2009
|
|||||||||
120,491
|
120,490(3)
|
$
|
11.11
|
June
26, 2016
|
|||||||||
Douglas
W. Jamison
|
8,647
|
69,237(4)
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2016
|
||||||||
138,200
|
0
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2008
|
|||||||||
53,334
|
106,666(2)
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2009
|
|||||||||
47,500
|
0
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2008
|
|||||||||
0
|
110,135(3)
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2009
|
|||||||||
0
|
92,365(5)
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2010
|
|||||||||
Alexei
A. Andreev
|
12,735
|
69,237(4)
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2016
|
||||||||
157,359
|
0
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2008
|
|||||||||
53,334
|
106,666(2)
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2009
|
|||||||||
38,000
|
0
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2008
|
|||||||||
0
|
88,108(3)
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2009
|
|||||||||
0
|
73,892(5)
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2010
|
|||||||||
Michael
A. Janse
|
9,891
|
69,237(6)
|
$
|
11.11
|
June
26, 2016
|
||||||||
228,000
|
0
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2008
|
|
||||||||
0
|
248,108(3)
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2009
|
|||||||||
0
|
73,892(5)
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2010
|
|||||||||
Sandra
M. Forman
|
12,600
|
69,237(4)
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2016
|
||||||||
55,000
|
0
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2008
|
|||||||||
25,000
|
50,000(2)
|
$
|
10.11
|
June
26, 2009
|
|||||||||
26,600
|
0
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2008
|
|||||||||
0
|
61,676(3)
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2009
|
|||||||||
0
|
46,724(5)
|
$
|
11.11
|
Dec.
27, 2010
|
(1)
|
Options
vest 100 percent on June 26,
2008.
|
(2)
|
Options
vest in two equal installments on June 26, 2008, and December 26,
2008.
|
(3)
|
Options
vest 100 percent on December 27,
2008.
|
(4)
|
Options
vest in seven equal installments on June 26, 2008, June 26, 2009,
June 26,
2010, June 26, 2011, June 26, 2012, June 26, 2013, and June 26,
2014.
|
(5)
|
Options
vest 100 percent on December 27,
2009.
|
(6)
|
Options
vest in seven equal installments on June 27, 2008, June 27, 2009,
June 27,
2010, June 27, 2011, June 27, 2012, June 27, 2013, and June 27,
2014.
|
65
2007
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The
following table presents information regarding the exercises of stock options
by
named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007.
Option
Awards
|
|||||||
Name
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
|
Value Realized on
Exercise
($)
|
|||||
Charles
E. Harris
|
192,466
|
244,291
|
|||||
Douglas
W. Jamison
|
199,048
|
359,391
|
|||||
Alexei
A. Andreev
|
185,040
|
343,632
|
|||||
Michael
A. Janse
|
0
|
0
|
|||||
Sandra
M. Forman
|
121,834
|
210,136
|
2007
Pension Benefits
The
following table presents information about the pension benefits attributable
to
the named executive officers as of December 31, 2007, and any pension benefit
payments to them during 2007.
Name
|
|
Plan
Name
|
|
Number
of Years Credited Service
(#)
|
|
Present
Value of Accumulated Benefits
($)
|
|
Payments
During Last Fiscal Year
($)
|
|
||||
Charles
E. Harris
|
Executive
Mandatory Retirement Plan
|
24
|
147,302
|
0
|
|||||||||
Douglas
W. Jamison
|
Executive
Mandatory Retirement Plan
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
The
present value of accumulated benefits amount reported in the table above
was
calculated pursuant to FAS 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions" and FAS
158,
"Employers' Accounting for Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans - an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)." Several statistical
and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events are used in
calculating the expense and liability values related to our pension plan.
These
factors include a discount rate assumption of 5.75 percent and use of the
94GAM
mortality table. The calculation also assumes that the benefit is earned
uniformly over the employees' careers. Any benefit attributable to service
prior
to the effective date of the plan is amortized over each person's future
working
lifetime.
Executive
Mandatory Retirement Benefit Plan
On
March
20, 2003, in order to begin planning for eventual management succession,
the
Board of Directors voted to establish the Executive Mandatory Retirement
Benefit
Plan for individuals who are employed by us in a bona fide executive or high
policy-making position. The plan was amended and restated effective January
1,
2005, to comply with certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. There
are
currently four individuals that qualify under the plan: Charles E. Harris,
the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Douglas W. Jamison, the President and
Chief Operating Officer, Daniel B. Wolfe, the Chief Financial Officer, and
Mel
P. Melsheimer, the former President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. Under this plan, mandatory retirement takes place effective December
31
of the year in which the eligible individuals attain the age of 65. On an
annual
basis beginning in the year in which the designated individual attains the
age
of 65, a committee of the Board consisting of non-interested directors may
determine for our benefit to postpone the mandatory retirement date for that
individual for one additional year.
66
Under
applicable law prohibiting discrimination in employment on the basis of age,
we
can impose a mandatory retirement age of 65 for our executives or employees
in
high policy-making positions only if each employee subject to the mandatory
retirement age is entitled to an immediate retirement benefit at retirement
age
of at least $44,000 per year. The benefits payable at retirement to Mr. Harris
and Mr. Melsheimer under our existing 401(k) plan do not equal this threshold.
The plan was established to provide the difference between the benefit required
under the age discrimination laws and that provided under our existing plans.
For individuals retiring after 2007, the benefit under the plan is paid to
the
qualifying individual in the form of a lump sum, and is paid six months and
one
day after the individual's separation from service with the Company, pursuant
to
certain exceptions. Mr. Harris's projected mandatory benefit will be
approximately $147,302 and paid as a lump sum six months and one day after
his
expected retirement on December 31, 2008.
2007
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
The
following table presents information regarding the Company's Amended and
Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007. Other than for Mr. Harris, we do not maintain any pension
or
non-qualified pension benefits except as disclosed in "Executive Mandatory
Retirement" above.
Name
|
|
Executive
Contributions in Last FY
($)
|
|
Registrant
Contribution in Last FY
($)(1)
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings in Last FY
($)
|
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
|
|
Aggregate
Balance at Last FYE
($)
|
|
|||||
Charles
E. Harris
|
0
|
306,187
|
210,533
|
0
|
2,667,020
|
(1)
|
This
amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under "All
Other
Compensation."
|
SERP
The
Employment Agreement provides that we adopt a supplemental executive retirement
plan (the "SERP") for the benefit of Mr. Harris. Under the SERP, we will
cause
an amount equal to one-twelfth of Mr. Harris's current annual salary to be
credited each month (a "Monthly Credit") to a special account maintained
on our
books for the benefit of Mr. Harris (the "SERP Account"), provided that Mr.
Harris is employed by us on the last business day of such month. The amounts
credited to the SERP Account are deemed invested or reinvested in such
investments as are requested by Mr. Harris and agreed to by the Company.
The
SERP Account is credited and debited to reflect the deemed investment returns,
losses and expenses attributed to such deemed investments and reinvestments
in
accordance with the terms of the SERP. Mr. Harris's benefit under the SERP
equals the balance in the SERP Account and such benefit will always be 100
percent vested (i.e., not forfeitable).
In
2005,
Mr. Harris received a $125,000 distribution from the SERP Account. The balance
of the SERP Account will be paid in a lump sum on May 30, 2008, and any
subsequent balance attributable to subsequent monthly credits will be paid
on
July 31, 2009.
If
Mr.
Harris dies before the entire benefit under the SERP Account has been paid
to
him, the amount remaining in the SERP Account will be distributed to his
beneficiary in a lump-sum payment on the 90th
day
after the date of his death.
67
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Other
than Mr. Harris, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, none of our executive
officers has a change in control agreement or is entitled to any special
payments solely upon a change in control.
In
the
event of termination without cause or by constructive discharge, Mr. Harris's
Employment Agreement provides for the continuation of certain benefits over
specified periods, as well as severance pay, payable to Mr. Harris (or to
his
estate if he dies before all payments are made), equal to two times his base
salary distributed over a period of two years.
In
addition, Mr. Harris is entitled to receive severance pay pursuant to the
severance compensation agreement that he entered into with us, effective
August
15, 1990, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2005. The severance
compensation agreement provides that if, following a change in our control,
as
defined in the agreement, Mr. Harris's employment is terminated by us without
cause or by him within one year of such change in control, he shall be entitled
to receive compensation in a lump sum payment equal to 2.99 times his average
base salary plus other amounts included in Mr. Harris's income as compensation
from the Company (but excluding bonus, incentive, profit-sharing plan and
equity
compensation) as in effect over the most recent five years preceding the
year in
which the change in control occurred. Under the severance compensation
agreement, Mr. Harris is also entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal
to
any amounts forfeited on account of his termination, under any employee pension
benefit plan, including benefits under the Company's executive mandatory
retirement benefit plan. In addition, he is entitled to receive medical and
health insurance coverage under the Company's retiree medical benefit plan
and
all other benefits he would be eligible to receive in the event of termination
without cause or by constructive discharge, although no duplicate benefits
will
be provided. In the event that Mr. Harris is entitled to receive 2.99 times
his
base salary under the severance compensation agreement, he shall not also
be
paid two times his base salary under the employment
agreement.
On
June
30, 1994, we adopted the Medical Benefit Retirement Plan. On February 10,
1997,
we amended this plan to include employees who have seven full years of service
and have attained 58 years of age. On November 3, 2005, we amended this plan
to
reverse the 1997 amendment for future retirees and to remove dependents other
than spouses from the plan. The coverage is secondary to any government or
subsequent employer-provided health-insurance plans. The annual premium cost
to
us with respect to the entitled retiree shall not exceed $12,000, subject
to an
index for inflation. As of December 31, 2007, and 2006, we had liabilities
of
$913,904 and $791,972, respectively, for the plan; there are no plan assets.
The
options of retirees who qualify for the Medical Benefit Retirement Plan will
remain exercisable (to the extent exercisable at the time of the optionee's
termination) post retirement, subject to certain conditions, if such retiree
executes a post-termination non-solicitation agreement, in a form reasonably
acceptable to the Company, until the expiration of its term.
The
following chart sets forth amounts that would have been payable to Mr. Harris
had he realized a qualifying termination of employment under his severance
agreement or Employment Agreement, determined as if the triggering event
had
occurred on December 31, 2007. Other than Mr. Harris, we do not maintain
any
established severance plan for our employees. Due to the number of factors
that
affect the calculations in the table, actual amounts paid or distributed
may be
different.
68
Termination
Scenarios
Charles
E. Harris
|
|
Termination
Following Change of Control
($)
|
|
Termination
Without
Cause or Constructive Discharge
($)
|
|
Termination
for Cause
($)
|
|
Mandatory
Retirement
($)
|
|
Voluntary
Termination
($)
|
|
Death
($)
|
|
Disability
($)
|
|
|||||||
Lump
Sum Salary Payments
|
885,434
|
612,374
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
612,374
|
0
|
|||||||||||||||
Medical
Insurance Benefits
|
194,423
|
194,423
|
0
|
194,423
|
194,423
|
194,423
|
194,423
|
|||||||||||||||
Pension
Benefits
|
147,302
|
0
|
0
|
147,302
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||||
All
Other Perqs.
|
146,101
|
146,101
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
373,256
|
|||||||||||||||
SERP
Payments
|
2,667,020
|
2,667,020
|
2,667,020
|
2,667,020
|
2,667,020
|
2,667,020
|
2,667,020
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
4,040,280
|
3,619,918
|
2,667,020
|
3,008,745
|
2,861,443
|
3,473,817
|
3,234,699
|
In
addition, pursuant to his stock option agreements, if Mr. Harris voluntarily
terminates his employment and executes a post-termination non-solicitation
agreement and a post-termination three-year non-compete agreement in forms
reasonably acceptable to the Company, his options (to the extent exercisable
at
the time of his termination) will remain exercisable until the expiration
of
their terms. If Mr. Harris’s employment terminates under any of the other
termination scenarios outlined in the table immediately above, his options
will
remain exercisable for periods ranging from zero to one year, depending on
the
type of option and termination scenario. Mr. Harris’s exercisable options as of
December 31, 2007 are reflected in the table “2007 Outstanding Equity Awards at
Fiscal Year-End.”
Remuneration
of Directors
The
following table sets forth the compensation paid by us to our directors for
the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. During 2007, we did not grant any stock
option awards or pay or accrue any pension or retirement benefits for our
directors.
2007
Director Compensation
Name
of Director
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash ($)
|
|
All Other
Compensation ($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|||
Independent
Directors:
|
||||||||||
W.
Dillaway Ayres, Jr.
|
42,000
|
0
|
42,000
|
|||||||
Dr.
C. Wayne Bardin
|
42,000
|
0
|
42,000
|
|||||||
Dr.
Phillip A. Bauman
|
45,000
|
0
|
45,000
|
|||||||
G.
Morgan Browne
|
45,000
|
0
|
45,000
|
|||||||
Dugald
A. Fletcher
|
57,000
|
0
|
57,000
|
|||||||
Mark
A. Parsells(1)
|
18,823
|
0
|
18,823
|
|||||||
Charles
E. Ramsey
|
42,000
|
0
|
42,000
|
|||||||
James
E. Roberts
|
47,250
|
0
|
47,250
|
|||||||
Richard
P. Shanley
|
29,710
|
0
|
29,710
|
69
Name
of Director
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash ($)
|
|
All Other
Compensation ($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|||
Interested
Directors:
|
||||||||||
Charles
E. Harris(2)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Douglas
W. Jamison(2)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Kelly
S. Kirkpatrick(3)
|
22,500
|
7,500
|
(4)
|
30,000
|
||||||
Lori
D. Pressman
|
24,000
|
35,938
|
(5)
|
59,938
|
——————————
(1) |
Mark
A. Parsells did not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting
held on
May 3, 2007.
|
(2) |
Mr.
Harris and Mr. Jamison do not receive additional compensation as
Directors. Refer to the "2007 Summary Compensation Table" for details
of
Mr. Harris's and Mr. Jamison’s compensation for
2007.
|
(3) |
Ms.
Kirkpatrick will not stand for re-election at the 2008 Annual Meeting
of
Shareholders.
|
(4) |
Represents
$7,500 for consulting services. Ms. Kirkpatrick may be considered
an
"interested person" because of consulting work performed for
us.
|
(5) |
Represents
$35,938 for consulting services. Ms. Pressman may be considered
an
"interested person" because of consulting work performed for
us.
|
There
are
no outstanding option awards to directors.
The
directors who are not officers receive $1,500 for each meeting of the Board
of
Directors and $1,500 for each committee meeting they attend, and a monthly
retainer of $750. Each non-employee committee Chairman receives an additional
monthly retainer of $250. The Lead Independent Director receives an additional
monthly retainer of $500. We also reimburse our directors for travel, lodging
and related expenses they incur in attending Board and committee meetings.
The
total compensation and reimbursement for expenses paid or payable to all
directors in 2007 was $468,497.
The
Board
of Directors has adopted a policy that 50 percent of all director fees must
be
used to purchase our common stock. In 2007, the directors collectively bought
26,555 shares in the open market.
OTHER
INFORMATION
We
are
not subject to any material pending or, to our knowledge, threatened legal
proceedings.
Our
custodian, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York
10154-1002, holds our securities in safekeeping.
Our
transfer and dividend-paying agent is American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, 59 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10038.
Our
independent registered public accounting firm is PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
300
Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017. It also provides tax return preparation
services for us.
BROKERAGE
In
2005,
we paid $48,732 in brokerage commissions for the sale of our shares in
NeuroMetrix, Inc. We did not effect any transactions in portfolio securities
in
2007 or 2006 except for the purchase and sale of treasury securities, for
which
we do not pay any brokerage commissions. Brokers are selected on the basis
of
our best judgment as to which brokers are most likely to be in contact with
likely buyers of the thinly traded securities of our portfolio companies.
We
will also consider the competitiveness of such broker’s commission rates. We
might pay a premium for a broker’s knowledge of the potential buyers.
70
DIVIDENDS
AND DISTRIBUTIONS
As
a
regulated investment company under the Code, we will not be subject to U.S.
federal income tax on our investment company taxable income that we distribute
to shareholders, provided that at least 90 percent of our investment company
taxable income for that taxable year is distributed to our shareholders. We
currently intend to retain our net capital gains for investment and pay the
associated federal corporate income tax. We may change this policy in the
future.
To
the
extent that we retain any net capital gain, we may pay deemed capital gain
dividends to shareholders. If we do pay a deemed capital gain dividend, you
will
not receive a cash distribution, but instead you will receive a tax credit
equal
to your proportionate share of the tax paid by us. When we declare a deemed
dividend, our dividend-paying agent will send you an IRS Form 2439 which will
reflect receipt of the deemed dividend income and the tax credit. This tax
credit, which we pay at the applicable corporate rate, is normally at a higher
rate than the rate payable by individual shareholders on the deemed dividend
income. The excess credit can be used by the shareholder to offset other taxes
due in that year or to generate a tax refund to the shareholder. In addition,
each shareholder’s tax basis in his shares of Common Stock is increased by the
excess of the capital gain on which we paid taxes over the amount of taxes
we
paid. See "Taxation."
We
did
not pay a cash dividend or declare a deemed capital gain dividend for 2007.
TAXATION
Taxation
of the Company
We
have
elected and qualified and intend to continue to qualify to be taxed as a
regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Code. Accordingly,
we
must, among other things, (a) derive in each taxable year at least 90 percent
of
our gross income (including tax-exempt interest) from dividends, interest,
payments with respect to certain securities loans, and gains from the sale
or
other disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies, or other income
(including but not limited to gain from options, futures and forward contracts)
derived with respect to our business of investing in stock, securities or
currencies; (b) diversify our holdings so that, at the end of each fiscal
quarter (i) at least 50 percent of the market value of our total assets is
represented by cash and cash items, U.S. government securities, the securities
of other regulated investment companies and other securities, with other
securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount not greater
than
five percent of the value of our total assets and not more than 10 percent
of
the outstanding voting securities of any issuer (subject to the exception
described below), and (ii) not more than 25 percent of the market value of
our
total assets is invested in the securities of any issuer (other than U.S.
government securities and the securities of other regulated investment
companies) or of any two or more issuers that we control and that are determined
to be engaged in the same business or similar or related trades or businesses,
and (c) annually distribute at least 90 percent of our investment company
taxable income as a dividend.
In
the
case of a regulated investment company which furnishes capital to development
corporations, there is an exception to the rule relating to the diversification
of investments described above. This exception is available only to registered
management investment companies which the SEC determines to be principally
engaged in the furnishing of capital to other corporations which are principally
engaged in the development or exploitation of inventions, technological
improvements, new processes, or products not previously generally available
("SEC Certification"). We have received SEC Certification since 1999, including
for 2006, but it is possible that we may not receive SEC Certification in
future
years. Pursuant to the SEC Certification, we are generally entitled to include,
in the computation of the 50 percent value of our assets (described in (b)(i)
above), the value of any securities of an issuer, whether or not we own more
than 10 percent of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer, if the
basis
of the securities, when added to our basis of any other securities of the
issuer
that we own, does not exceed five percent of the value of our total
assets.
71
As
a
regulated investment company, in any fiscal year with respect to which we
distribute at least 90 percent of the sum of our (i) investment company taxable
income (which includes, among other items, dividends, interest and the excess
of
any net short-term capital gains over net long-term capital losses and other
taxable income other than any net capital gain reduced by deductible expenses)
determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and (ii) net
tax
exempt interest (the excess of its gross tax exempt interest over certain
disallowed deductions), we (but not our shareholders) generally will not be
subject to U.S. federal income tax on investment company taxable income and
net
capital gains that we distribute to shareholders. To the extent that we retain
our net capital gains for investment, we will be subject to U.S. federal income
tax. We currently intend to retain our net capital gains for investment and
pay
the associated federal corporate income tax. We may change this policy in the
future.
Amounts
not distributed on a timely basis in accordance with a calendar year
distribution requirement are subject to a nondeductible four percent excise
tax
payable by us. To avoid this tax, we must distribute (or be deemed to have
distributed) during each calendar year an amount equal to the sum of:
(1) |
at
least 98 percent of our ordinary income (not taking into account
any
capital gains or losses) for the calendar
year;
|
(2) |
at
least 98 percent of our capital gains in excess of our capital losses
(adjusted for certain ordinary losses) for a one-year period generally
ending on October 31 of the calendar year (unless an election is
made by a
company with a November or December year-end to use the company’s fiscal
year); and
|
(3) |
any
undistributed amounts from previous years on which we paid no U.S.
federal
income tax.
|
While
we
intend to distribute any income and capital gains in the manner necessary to
minimize imposition of the four percent excise tax, sufficient amounts of our
taxable income and capital gains may not be distributed to avoid entirely the
imposition of the tax. In that event, we will be liable for the tax only on
the
amount by which we do not meet the foregoing distribution
requirement.
If
in any
particular taxable year, we do not qualify as a regulated investment company,
all of our taxable income (including its net capital gains) will be subject
to
tax at regular corporate rates without any deduction for distributions to
shareholders, and distributions will be taxable to the shareholders as ordinary
dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and
profits.
We
may
decide to be taxed as a corporation even if we would otherwise qualify as a
regulated investment company.
Company
Investments
We
may
make certain investments which would subject us to special provisions of the
Code that, among other things, may affect the character of the gains or losses
realized by us and require us to recognize income or gain without receiving
cash
with which to make distributions.
In
the
event we invest in foreign securities, we may be subject to withholding and
other foreign taxes with respect to those securities. We do not expect to
satisfy the requirement to pass through to the shareholders their share of
the
foreign taxes paid by us.
Due
to
our expected investments, in general, distributions will not be eligible for
the
dividends received deduction allowed to corporate shareholders and will not
qualify for the reduced rate of tax for qualified dividend income allowed to
individuals.
72
Taxation
of Shareholders
Distributions
we pay to you from our ordinary income or from an excess of net short-term
capital gains over net long-term capital losses (together referred to
hereinafter as "ordinary income dividends") are taxable to you as ordinary
income to the extent of our earnings and profits. Distributions made to you
from
an excess of net long-term capital gains over net short-term capital losses
("capital gain dividends"), including capital gain dividends credited to you
but
retained by us, are taxable to you as long-term capital gains, regardless of
the
length of time you have owned our shares. Distributions in excess of our
earnings and profits will first reduce the adjusted tax basis of your shares
and, after the adjusted tax basis is reduced to zero, will constitute capital
gains to you (assuming the shares are held as a capital asset). Generally,
you
will be provided with a written notice designating the amount of any (i)
ordinary income dividends no later than 30 days after the close of the taxable
year, and (ii) capital gain dividends or other distributions no later than
60
days after the close of the taxable year.
In
the
event that we retain any net capital gains, we may designate the retained
amounts as undistributed capital gains in a notice to our shareholders. If
a
designation is made, shareholders would include in income, as long-term capital
gains, their proportionate share of the undistributed amounts, but would be
allowed a credit or refund, as the case may be, for their proportionate share
of
the corporate tax paid by us. In addition, the tax basis of shares owned by
a
shareholder would be increased by an amount equal to the difference between
(i)
the amount included in the shareholder’s income as long-term capital gains and
(ii) the shareholder’s proportionate share of the corporate tax paid by us.
Shareholders should consult their tax advisors for further information about
the
impact of a deemed dividend on their state or local taxes.
Dividends
and other taxable distributions are taxable to you even though they are
reinvested in additional shares of our Common Stock. If we pay you a dividend
in
January which was declared in the previous October, November or December to
shareholders of record on a specified date in one of these months, then the
dividend will be treated for tax purposes as being paid by us and received
by
you on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
A
shareholder will realize gain or loss on the sale or exchange of our common
shares in an amount equal to the difference between the shareholder’s adjusted
basis in the shares sold or exchanged and the amount realized on their
disposition. Generally, gain recognized by a shareholder on the sale or other
disposition of our common shares will result in capital gain or loss to you,
and
will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for more
than one year at the time of sale. Any loss upon the sale or exchange of our
shares held for six months or less will be treated as a long-term capital loss
to the extent of any capital gain dividends received (including amounts credited
as an undistributed capital gain dividend) by you. A loss realized on a sale
or
exchange of our shares will be disallowed if other substantially identical
shares are acquired (whether through the automatic reinvestment of dividends
or
otherwise) within a 61-day period beginning 30 days before and ending 30 days
after the date that the shares are disposed of. In this case, the basis of
the
shares acquired will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss.
In
general, federal withholding taxes at a 30 percent rate (or a lower rate
pursuant to a tax treaty) will apply to distributions to shareholders (except
to
those distributions designated by us as capital gain dividends) that are
nonresident aliens or foreign partnerships, trusts or corporations (a "non-U.S.
investor"). Different tax consequences may result if a non-U.S. investor is
engaged in a trade or business in the United States or, in the case of an
individual, is present in the United States for 183 or more days during a
taxable year and certain other conditions are met.
Backup
Withholding
We
are
required in some circumstances to backup withholding on taxable dividends and
other payments paid to non-corporate holders of our shares who do not furnish
us
with their correct taxpayer identification number and certifications, or who
are
otherwise subject to backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional
tax. Any amounts withheld from payments made to you may be refunded or credited
against your U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the
required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue
Service.
73
The
foregoing is a general discussion of the provisions of the Code and the Treasury
regulations in effect as they directly govern our taxation and our shareholders.
These provisions are subject to change by legislative or administrative action,
and any change may be retroactive. The discussion does not purport to deal
with
all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to us, or which
may
be important to particular shareholders in light of their individual investment
circumstances or to some types of shareholders subject to special tax rules,
such as financial institutions, broker-dealers, insurance companies, tax-exempt
organizations, partnerships or other pass-through entities, persons holding
notes in connection with a hedging, straddle, conversion or other integrated
transaction, persons engaged in a trade or business in the United States or
persons who have ceased to be U.S. citizens or to be taxed as resident aliens.
Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisers regarding specific
questions as to U.S. federal, foreign, state and local income or other
taxes.
A
business development company is regulated by the 1940 Act. A business
development company must be organized in the United States for the purpose
of
investing primarily in companies that are organized in the United States
and
engaged primarily in businesses other than certain financial businesses and
that
either do not have any securities listed on a national securities exchange
or
are controlled by the business development company. In addition, the business
development company must make managerial assistance available to these portfolio
companies. A business development company may use capital provided by public
shareholders and from other sources to invest in what are usually private
investments. A business development company provides shareholders the ability
to
retain the liquidity of a publicly traded stock, while sharing in the possible
benefits, if any, of investing primarily in what are usually privately owned
companies.
As
a
business development company, we may not acquire any assets other than
"qualifying assets" unless, at the time we make the acquisition, the value
of
our qualifying assets represents at least 70 percent of the value of our total
assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business
are:
·
|
securities
purchased in transactions not involving any public offering, the
issuer of
which is an eligible portfolio
company;
|
·
|
securities
received in exchange for or distributed with respect to securities
described in the bullet above or pursuant to the exercise of options,
warrants or rights relating to the securities;
and
|
·
|
cash,
cash items, government securities or high quality debt securities
(within
the meaning of the 1940 Act), maturing in one year or less from the
time
of investment.
|
An
eligible portfolio company is generally a domestic company that is not an
investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly
owned
by a business development company) and is not engaged primarily in certain
financial businesses and that:
·
|
does
not have a class of securities registered on a national securities
exchange;
|
·
|
is
actively controlled by the business development company and has an
affiliate of a business development company on its Board of Directors;
or
|
·
|
meets
other criteria as may be established by the
SEC.
|
Control
under the 1940 Act is presumed to exist where a business development company
beneficially owns more than 25 percent of the outstanding voting securities
of
the portfolio company.
74
To
include securities described above as qualifying assets for the purpose of
the
70 percent test, a business development company must make available to the
issuer of those securities (whether directly or through cooperating parties)
significant managerial assistance such as providing significant guidance and
counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and
policies of a portfolio company. We offer to provide managerial assistance
to
each of our portfolio companies.
As
a
business development company, we are entitled to issue senior securities in
the
form of stock or indebtedness, including bank borrowings and debt securities,
as
long as our senior securities have an asset coverage of at least 200 percent
immediately after each issuance. See "Risk Factors."
We
may
also be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain
transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of members of our
Board of Directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, may have
to seek prior approval from the SEC.
As
with
other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, a business development company must
adhere to substantive regulatory requirements. A majority of our directors
must
be persons who are not interested persons, as that term is defined in the 1940
Act. Additionally, we are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by
a
reputable fidelity insurance company to protect us against larceny and
embezzlement. Furthermore, as a business development company, we are prohibited
from protecting any director or officer against any liability to us or our
shareholders arising from willful malfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence
or
reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of that person’s
office.
We
maintain a code of ethics under Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act that establishes
procedures for personal investment and restricts some transactions by our
personnel. Our code of ethics generally does not permit investment by our
employees in private securities that may be purchased or held by us. The code
of
ethics is filed as an exhibit to our registration statement of which this
Prospectus is a part. You may read and copy the code of ethics at the SEC’s
Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may obtain information on
operations of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 202-942-8090.
In
addition, the code of ethics is available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC
Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. You may obtain copies of the code of
ethics, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following
email address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing to the SEC’s Public Reference
Section, 450 5th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.
We
may
not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our
election as, a business development company unless authorized by vote of
a
majority of the outstanding voting securities, voting on the matter at a
meeting
at which a quorum is present.
We
vote
proxies relating to our portfolio securities in what management believes is
in
the best interest of our shareholders. We carefully review on a case by case
basis each proposal submitted to a shareholder vote to determine its impact
on
the portfolio securities held by us. Although we generally vote against
proposals that may have a negative impact on our portfolio securities, we may
vote for such a proposal if there exists a compelling long-term reason to do
so.
Our
proxy
voting decisions are made by the Managing Directors who are responsible for
monitoring each of our investments. To ensure that our vote is not the product
of a conflict of interest, we required that: (i) anyone involved in the
decision-making process disclose to our Chief Compliance Officer any potential
conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had
with
any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in
the
decision-making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing
how
we intend to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence
from
interested parties.
Shareholders
may obtain information regarding how we voted proxies with respect to our public
portfolio companies by making a written request for proxy voting information
or
by contacting us by telephone at 1-877-TINY-TECH.
75
CAPITALIZATION
We
are
authorized to issue 45,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.10 per share.
Each
share within a particular class or series thereof has equal voting, dividend,
distribution and liquidation rights. When issued, in accordance with the terms
thereof, shares of Common Stock will be fully paid and non-assessable. Shares
of
Common Stock are not redeemable and have no preemptive, conversion, or
cumulative voting rights.
The
following table shows the number of shares of (i) capital stock authorized,
(ii)
the amount held by us or for our own account, and (iii) capital stock
outstanding for each class of our authorized securities as of December 31,
2007.
Title
of Class
|
|
Amount
Authorized
|
|
Amount
Held by Company or for its Own Account
|
|
Amount
Outstanding
|
|
|||
Common
Stock
|
45,000,000
|
1,828,740
|
23,314,573
|
|||||||
Preferred
Stock
|
2,000,000
|
0
|
0
|
Issuance
of Preferred Stock
Our
Board
of Directors is authorized by our articles of incorporation to issue up to
2,000,000 shares of preferred stock having a par value of $0.10 per share.
The
Board of Directors is authorized to divide the preferred stock into one or
more
series and to determine the terms of each series, including, but not limited
to,
the voting rights, redemption provisions, dividend rate and liquidation
preference. Any terms must be consistent with the requirements of the 1940
Act.
The 1940 Act currently prohibits us from issuing any preferred stock if after
giving effect to the issuance the value of our total assets, less all
liabilities and indebtedness other than senior securities, would be less than
200 percent of the aggregate amount of senior securities representing
indebtedness plus the aggregate involuntary liquidation value of our preferred
stock (other than up to 5 percent borrowings for temporary purposes). Leveraging
with preferred stock raises the same general potential for loss or gain and
other risks as does leveraging with borrowings described above.
Options
and Warrants
We
have
no warrants outstanding. As of March 31, 2008, we had 4,315,776 options
outstanding, which were granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan described
herein. Under the 1940 Act, we cannot issue options and/or warrants for more
than 25 percent of our outstanding voting securities.
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
We
may
sell our Common Stock through underwriters or dealers, directly to one or more
purchasers through agents or through a combination of any such methods of sale.
Any underwriter or agent involved in the offer and sale of our Common Stock
will
be named in the applicable Prospectus Supplement.
The
distribution of our Common Stock may be effected from time to time in one or
more transactions at a fixed price or prices, which may be changed, at
prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at prices related to such
prevailing market prices, or at negotiated prices, provided, however, that
the
offering price per share must equal or exceed the net asset value per share
of
our Common Stock exclusive of any underwriting commissions or
discounts.
In
connection with the sale of our Common Stock, underwriters or agents may receive
compensation from us in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions.
Underwriters may sell our Common Stock to or through dealers, and such dealers
may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions
from the underwriters and/or commissions from the purchasers for whom they
may
act as agents. Underwriters, dealers and agents that participate in the
distribution of our Common Stock may be deemed to be underwriters under the
Securities Act of 1933, and any discounts and commissions they receive from
us
and any profit realized by them on the resale of our Common Stock may be deemed
to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act of 1933.
Any such underwriter or agent will be identified and any such compensation
received from us will be described in the applicable Prospectus Supplement.
The
maximum commission or discount to be received by any NASD member or independent
broker-dealer will not exceed eight percent. We will not pay any compensation
to
any underwriter or agent in the form of warrants, options, consulting or
structuring fees or similar arrangements.
76
Any
Common Stock sold pursuant to a Prospectus Supplement will be listed on the
Nasdaq Global Market.
Under
agreements into which we may enter, underwriters, dealers and agents who
participate in the distribution of our Common Stock may be entitled to
indemnification by us against certain liabilities, including liabilities under
the Securities Act of 1933. Underwriters, dealers and agents may engage in
transactions with us, or perform services for us, in the ordinary course of
business.
If
so
indicated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, we will authorize
underwriters or other persons acting as our agents to solicit offers by certain
institutions to purchase our Common Stock from us pursuant to contracts
providing for payment and delivery on a future date. Institutions with which
such contacts may be made include commercial and savings banks, insurance
companies, pension funds, investment companies, educational and charitable
institutions and others, but in all cases such institutions must be approved
by
us. The obligations of any purchaser under any such contract will be subject
to
the condition that the purchase of the Common Stock shall not at the time of
delivery be prohibited under the laws of the jurisdiction to which such
purchaser is subject. The underwriters and such other agents will not have
any
responsibility in respect of the validity or performance of such contracts.
Such
contracts will be subject only to those conditions set forth in the Prospectus
Supplement, and the Prospectus Supplement will set forth the commission payable
for solicitation of such contracts.
In
order
to comply with the securities laws of certain states, if applicable, our Common
Stock offered hereby will be sold in such jurisdictions only through registered
or licensed brokers or dealers.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain
legal matters will be passed on by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
New York, New York, our special counsel in connection with the offering of
Common Stock.
EXPERTS
Our
audited financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each
of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 have been incorporated
by
reference from our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K in reliance on the report
of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm,
given
on the authority of that firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is located at 300 Madison Avenue, New York, New
York
10017.
We
will
furnish, without charge, a copy of such financial statements upon request by
writing to 111 West 57th Street, Suite 1100, New York, New York 10019,
Attention: Investor Relations, or calling 1-800-TINY-TECH.
FURTHER
INFORMATION
We
are
subject to the informational requirements of the 1934 Act and in accordance
therewith file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.
The
reports, proxy statements and other information filed by us can be inspected
and
copied at public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 450 Fifth Street,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, its Northeast Regional Office, 233 Broadway,
New
York, New York 10279 and its Chicago Regional Office, Suite 900, 175 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. You can obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference room by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330.
The
SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy statements, and other
information. The address of the SEC’s website is http://www.sec.gov. Copies of
this material may also be obtained from the Public Reference Branch, Office
of
Consumer Affairs and Information Services of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. Our Common Stock is listed on
the
Nasdaq Global Market and our reports, proxy statements and other information
concerning us can be inspected and copied at the library of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., 1735 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20006.
77
PRIVACY
POLICY
We
are
committed to maintaining the privacy of our shareholders and to safeguarding
their non-public personal information. The following information is provided
to
help you understand what personal information we collect, how we protect that
information and why, in some cases, we may share information with select other
parties.
Generally,
we do not receive any non-public personal information relating to our
shareholders, although some non-public personal information of our shareholders
may become available to us. We do not disclose any non-public personal
information about our shareholders or former shareholders to anyone, except
as
permitted by law or as is necessary in order to service shareholder accounts
(for example, to a transfer agent or third party administrator).
We
restrict access to non-public personal information about our shareholders to
our
employees and to employees of our service providers and their affiliates with
a
legitimate business need for the information. We maintain physical, electronic
and procedural safeguards designed to protect the non-public personal
information of our shareholders.
78
HARRIS
& HARRIS GROUP, INC.
4,000,000
Shares
Common
Stock
The
date
of the Prospectus is ,
2008
__________________
This
Prospectus constitutes a part of a registration statement on Form N-2 (together
with all the exhibits and the appendix thereto, the "Registration Statement")
filed by us with the SEC under the Securities Act. This Prospectus does not
contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement.
Reference is hereby made to the Registration Statement and related exhibits
for
further information with respect to us and the shares offered hereby. Statements
contained herein concerning the provisions of documents are necessarily
summaries of the material terms of such documents.
No
dealer, salesperson or other person has been authorized to give any information
or to make any representations not contained in this Prospectus. If given or
made, any information or representation must not be relied upon as having been
authorized by us. This Prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or the
solicitation of an offer to buy any security other than the shares of Common
Stock offered by this Prospectus, nor does it constitute an offer to sell or
the
solicitation of an offer to buy shares of Common Stock by anyone in any
jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation would be
unlawful.
PART
C — OTHER INFORMATION
Item
25. Financial Statements and Exhibits
(1) Financial
Statements
- The
following financial statements and related documents have been incorporated
by
reference into the Registration Statement:
(a)
Annual
Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2007, and
2006
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended December
31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December
31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended December
31, 2007,
2006, and 2005
|
|
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2007, and 2006
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Schedule of Investments
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
Financial
Highlights for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and
2005
|
Statements,
schedules and historical information other than those listed above have been
omitted since they are either not applicable, or not required or the required
information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(2) Exhibits:
(a)
(1) Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of Harris & Harris Group, Inc., dated September
23, 2005, incorporated by reference as Exhibit 99 to Form 8-K filed on September
27, 2005.
(2) Certificate
of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of Harris & Harris Group,
Inc., dated May 19, 2006, incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2006.
(b) Restated
By-laws of the Company, incorporated by reference as Exhibit 2(b) to
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form
N-2 (File No. 333-112862), filed on March 22, 2004.
(c) Not
applicable.
(d) Form
of
Specimen Certificate of Common Stock.(2)
(e) Not
applicable.
C-1
(f) Not
applicable.
(g) Not
applicable.
(h) Not
applicable.
(i)
(1) Harris
& Harris Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Employee Profit-Sharing Plan,
incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 814-00176), filed on March 13,
2008.
(2) Harris
& Harris Group, Inc., 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference
as Appendix B to the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting
of
Shareholders filed on April 3, 2006.
(3) Form
of
Incentive Stock Option Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1
to
the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 814-00176) filed on June 26,
2006.
(4) Form
of
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, incorporated by reference as Exhibit
10.2
to the Company's Form 8-K (File No. 814-00176) filed on June 26,
2006.
(5) Harris
& Harris Group, Inc. Directors Stock Purchase Plan 2001.(2)
(6) Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement between Harris & Harris Group, Inc. and
Charles E. Harris, dated August 2, 2007, incorporated by reference as Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 814-00176) filed on August 3,
2007.
(7) Amended
and Restated Severance Compensation Agreement, dated August 2, 2007,
incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K (File No.
814-00176) filed on August 3, 2007.
(8) Deferred
Compensation Agreement, incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.5 to the
Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File
No.
814-00176) filed
on
March 16, 2005.
(9) Amendment
No. 4 to Deferred Compensation Agreement, incorporated
by reference as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Form 10-Q (File
No.
814-00176) filed
on
August 9, 2006.
(10) Amendment
No 2. to
Deferred Compensation Agreement, incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1
to
the Company's Form 8-K (File
No.
814-00176) filed
on
October 15, 2004.
(11) Amendment
No. 1 to Deferred Compensation Agreement.(1)
(12) Trust
Under Harris & Harris Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation
Agreement.(2)
(13) Amended
and Restated Harris & Harris Group, Inc. Executive Mandatory Retirement
Benefit Plan, dated August 2, 2007, incorporated by reference as Exhibit
10.4 to
the Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 814-00176) filed on August 3,
2007.
(14) Amended
and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated August 2, 2007,
incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K (File No.
814-00176) filed on August 3, 2007.
(j) Harris
& Harris Group, Inc. Custodian Agreement with JP Morgan, incorporated by
reference as Exhibit 2(j) to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-112862) filed on March 22,
2004.
C-2
(k)
(1) Form
of
Indemnification Agreement which has been established with all directors and
executive officers of the Company, incorporated by reference as Exhibit 2(i)(7)
to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement
on Form
N-2 (File No. 333-112862) filed on March 22, 2004.
(2) Agreement
of Sub-Sublease, dated April 18, 2003, by and between Prominent USA, Inc.
and
Harris & Harris Group, Inc., incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.17 to
the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No.
814-00176), filed on March 13, 2008.
(3) Amendment
to Agreement of Sub-Sublease, dated May 9, 2003, by and between Prominent
USA,
Inc., and Harris & Harris Group, Inc., incorporated by reference as exhibit
10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No.
814-00176), filed on March 13, 2008.
(4) Assignment
and Assumption, Modification and Extension of Sublease Agreement, dated December
17, 2004, by and among the Economist Newspaper Group, Inc., National Academy
of
Television Arts & Sciences, and Harris & Harris Group, Inc.,
incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007 (File No.814-00176) filed on March 13,
2008.
(l) Opinion
letter of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP.(3)
(m) Not
applicable.
(n) Consent
of the
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.(1)
(o) Not
applicable.
(p) Not
applicable.
(q) Not
applicable.
(r)
Code
of
Ethics Pursuant to Rule 17j-1, incorporated by reference as Exhibit 14 to
the
Company's Form 8-K (File No. 814-00176) filed on March 7,
2008.
(s) Powers
of
Attorney.(2)(4)
(1) Filed
herewith.
(2) Previously
filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No.
333-138996) filed on November 29, 2006.
(3) Previously
filed with Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form N-2 (File No. 333-138996) filed on April 23, 2007
Item
26. Marketing Arrangements
The
information contained under the heading "Plan of Distribution" on page 76
of the
Prospectus is incorporated herein by reference, and any information concerning
any underwriters will be contained in the accompanying Prospectus Supplement,
if
any.
C-3
Item
27. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
The
following table sets forth the expenses to be incurred in connection with this
offering described in this Registration Statement:
Registration
fees
|
$
|
5,000
|
||
Nasdaq
listing fee
|
$
|
6,500
|
||
Printing
(other than stock certificates)
|
$
|
0
|
||
Accounting
fees and expenses
|
$
|
40,000
|
||
Legal
fees and expenses
|
$
|
115,000
|
||
Miscellaneous
|
$
|
83,500
|
||
Total
|
$
|
250,000
|
Item
28. Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control with
Company
At
December 31, 2007
|
Organized
under
laws of
|
Percentage
of voting
securities
owned
by
the Registrant
|
||
Harris
& Harris Enterprises, Inc.
|
Delaware
|
100%
|
Item
29. Number of Holders of Securities
(as of
April 1, 2008)
Title
of class
|
Number
of record holders
|
|
Common
Stock, $.01 par value
|
134
|
Item
30. Indemnification
Article
8
("Article 8") of our Certificate of Incorporation, as adopted by our board
of
directors in October 1992, and approved by our shareholders in December 1992
and
restated in September 2005, provides for the indemnification of our directors
and officers to the fullest extent permitted by applicable New York law, subject
to the applicable provisions of the 1940 Act.
Scope
of Indemnification Under New York Law.
BCL §§
721-726 provide that a director or officer of a New York corporation who was
or
is a party or a threatened party to any threatened, pending or completed action,
suit or proceeding (i) shall be entitled to indemnification by the corporation
for all expenses of litigation when he is successful
on the
merits, (ii) may be indemnified by the corporation for judgments, fines, and
amounts paid in settlement of, and reasonable expenses incurred in, litigation
(other than a derivative suit), even if he is not successful on the merits,
if
he acted in good faith and for a purpose he reasonably believed to be in or
not
opposed to the best interest of the corporation (and, in criminal proceedings,
had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful), and (iii)
may
be indemnified by the corporation for amounts paid in settlement and reasonable
expenses incurred in a derivative suit (i.e., a suit by a shareholder alleging
a
breach of a duty owed to the corporation by a director or officer) even if
he is
not successful on the merits, if he acted in good faith, for a purpose which
he
believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interest of the corporation.
However, no indemnification may be made in accordance with clause (iii) if
he is
adjudged liable to the corporation, unless a court determines that, despite
the
adjudication of liability and in view of all of the circumstances, he is
entitled to indemnification. The indemnification described in clauses (ii)
and
(iii) above and the advancement of litigation expenses, may be made only upon
a
determination by (i) a majority of a quorum of disinterested directors, (ii)
independent legal counsel, or (iii) the shareholders that indemnification is
proper because the applicable standard of conduct has been met. In addition,
litigation expenses to a director or officer may only be made upon receipt
of an
undertaking by the director or officer to repay the expenses if it is ultimately
determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified. The indemnification and
advancement of expenses provided for by BCL §§ 721-726 are not deemed
exclusive of any rights the indemnitee may have under any by-law, agreement,
vote of shareholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise. When any action
with respect to indemnification of directors is taken by amendment to the
by-laws, resolution of directors, or agreement, the corporation must mail a
notice of the action taken to its shareholders of record by the earlier of
(i)
the date of the next annual meeting, or (ii) fifteen months after the date
of
the action taken.
C-4
The
foregoing provisions are subject to Section 17(h) of the 1940 Act, which
provides that neither the certificate of incorporation or by-laws
nor any
agreement may protect any director or officer against any liability to the
Company or any of its stockholders to which he would otherwise be subject by
reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard
of his duties.
The
Indemnification Agreements.
Pursuant to the Indemnification Agreement, the Company would indemnify the
indemnified director or officer (the "Indemnitee") to the fullest extent
permitted by New York law as in effect at the time of execution of the
Indemnification Agreement and to such fuller extent as New York law may permit
in the future, subject in each case to the applicable provisions of the 1940
Act. An Indemnitee would be entitled to receive indemnification against all
judgments rendered, fines levied, and other assessments (including amounts
paid
in settlement of any claims, if approved by the Company), plus all reasonable
costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred in connection with the
defense of any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether
civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative (an "Action"), related to
or
arising from (i) any actual or alleged act or omission of the Indemnitee at
any
time as a director, officer, employee, or agent of the Company or any of its
affiliates or subsidiaries, or (ii) the Indemnitee’s past, present, or future
status as a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company or any of its
affiliates or subsidiaries. An Indemnitee would also be entitled to advancement
of all reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the defense of any Action
upon
a finding by a court or an opinion of independent counsel that the Indemnitee
is
more likely than not to prevail. If the Company makes any payment to the
Indemnitee under the Indemnification Agreement and it is ultimately determined
that the Indemnitee was not entitled to be indemnified, the Indemnitee would
be
required to repay the Company for all amounts paid to the Indemnitee under
the
Indemnification agreement. An Indemnitee would not be entitled to
Indemnification or advancement of expenses under the Indemnification Agreement
with respect to any proceeding or claim brought by him against the
Company.
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933
(the
"Act") may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Company
has been
advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the
payment by the Company of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or
controlling person of the Company in the successful defense of any action,
suit
or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person
in
connection with the securities being registered, the Company will, unless in
the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent,
submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and
will
be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
We
maintain directors’ and officers’
liability insurance.
Item
31. Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser
Not
applicable because the Company
has no
investment adviser.
Item
32. Location of Accounts and Records
Certain
accounts, books and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a)
of the 1940 Act and the Rules promulgated
there
under are maintained at the offices of the Company at 111
West
57th
Street,
Suite 1100,
New
York, New York 10019. Certain accounts, books and other documents pertaining
to
the Company’s subsidiaries are maintained at 111
West
57th
Street,
Suite 1100, New
York,
New York 10019.
C-5
Item
33. Management Services
Global
Shares provides stock plan administration services for our Equity Incentive
Plan. The total cost of these services for 2008 is estimated to be
$17,500.
Item
34. Undertakings
1. |
We
undertake to suspend the offering of shares until we amend our prospectus
if:
|
(1)
|
subsequent
to the effective date of this Registration Statement, the net asset
value
per share declines more than 10 percent from our net asset value
per share
as of the effective date of the Registration Statement;
or
|
(2)
|
the
net asset value increases to an amount greater than our net proceeds
as
stated in the Prospectus.
|
2. |
Not
applicable.
|
3. |
Not
applicable.
|
4. |
We
hereby undertake:
|
(a)
|
to
file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made,
a
post-effective amendment to this Registration
Statement:
|
(1)
|
to
include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities
Act
of 1933;
|
(2)
|
to
reflect in the prospectus any facts or events after the effective
date of
the Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment
thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental
change in the information set forth in the Registration Statement;
and
|
(3)
|
to
include any material information with respect to the plan of
distribution
not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement or any
material
change to such information in the Registration
Statement.
|
(b)
|
that
for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of
1933, each post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered therein,
and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial
bona fide offering thereof;
|
(c)
|
to
remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment
any of the
securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination
of the
offering; and
|
(d)
|
that
for the purposes of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of
1933, each filing of our annual report or quarterly reports pursuant
to
section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 that
is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall
be deemed
to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed
to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
|
C-6
5.
|
We
hereby undertake:
|
(a)
|
that
for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of
1933, the information omitted from the form of Prospectus filed as
part of
this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained
in a
form of Prospectus filed by the Company pursuant to Rule 497(e) and
Rule
497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this
Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective;
and
|
(b)
|
that
for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of
1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of Prospectus
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to
the
securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that
time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
|
6. |
Not
Applicable.
|
C-7
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant has duly
caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of New York, and State
of
New York, on the 4th
day of
April, 2008.
HARRIS
& HARRIS GROUP, INC.
|
||
By:
|
/s/
Charles E. Harris
|
|
Name:
|
Charles
E. Harris
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, this Registration
Statement has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
/s/
Charles E. Harris
|
Chairman
of the Board and
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Charles
E. Harris
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||||
/s/
Daniel B. Wolfe
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Daniel
B. Wolfe
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|||
/s/
Patricia N. Egan
|
Chief
Accounting Officer, Senior
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Patricia
N. Egan
|
Controller
and Vice President
|
|||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
W.
Dillaway Ayres, Jr.
|
||||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Dr.
C. Wayne Bardin
|
||||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Dr.
Phillip A. Bauman
|
||||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
G.
Morgan Browne
|
||||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Dugald
A. Fletcher
|
||||
/s/
Douglas W. Jamison
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Douglas
W. Jamison
|
||||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Kelly
S. Kirkpatrick
|
||||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Lori
D. Pressman
|
||||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Charles
E. Ramsey
|
||||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
James
E. Roberts
|
||||
*
|
Director
|
April
4, 2008
|
||
Richard
P. Shanley
|
*By:
|
/s/ Charles E. Harris
|
|
Attorney-in-fact
|
EXHIBITS
(i) (11)
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Deferred Compensation Agreement.
|
(n) | Consent of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |